Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus psychoeducational intervention in bipolar outpatients: Results from a randomized controlled trial

0 PSYCHIATRY
Consuelo de Dios , Diego Carracedo-Sanchidrián , Carmen Bayón , Beatriz Rodríguez-Vega , María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz , Ana Mª González-Pinto , Guillermo Lahera , BIMIND Group
{"title":"Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus psychoeducational intervention in bipolar outpatients: Results from a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Consuelo de Dios ,&nbsp;Diego Carracedo-Sanchidrián ,&nbsp;Carmen Bayón ,&nbsp;Beatriz Rodríguez-Vega ,&nbsp;María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz ,&nbsp;Ana Mª González-Pinto ,&nbsp;Guillermo Lahera ,&nbsp;BIMIND Group","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Few controlled trials have assessed the impact of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on symptoms and functioning in bipolar disorder (BD). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MBCT adjunctive group treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded trial that included BP-outpatients with subthreshold depressive symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to three arms: treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus psychoeducation; and TAU plus MBCT. Primary outcome was change in Hamilton-D score; secondary endpoints were change in anxiety, hypo/mania symptoms and functional improvement. Patients were assessed at baseline (V1), 8 weeks (V2) and 6 months (V3). Main hypothesis was that adjunctive MBCT would improve depressive symptoms more than psychoeducation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-four participants were recruited (MBCT<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->40, Psychoeducation<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->34, TAU<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10). Depressive symptoms improved in the three arms between V1 and V2 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and between V1 and V3 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and did not change between V2 and V3. At V3 no significant differences between groups were found. There were no significant differences in other measures either.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our BD population we did not find superiority of adjunctive MBCT over adjunctive Psychoeducation or TAU on subsyndromal depressive symptoms; neither on anxiety, hypo/mania, relapses, or functioning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 251-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989121000951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Few controlled trials have assessed the impact of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on symptoms and functioning in bipolar disorder (BD). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MBCT adjunctive group treatment.

Material and methods

Randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded trial that included BP-outpatients with subthreshold depressive symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to three arms: treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus psychoeducation; and TAU plus MBCT. Primary outcome was change in Hamilton-D score; secondary endpoints were change in anxiety, hypo/mania symptoms and functional improvement. Patients were assessed at baseline (V1), 8 weeks (V2) and 6 months (V3). Main hypothesis was that adjunctive MBCT would improve depressive symptoms more than psychoeducation.

Results

Eighty-four participants were recruited (MBCT = 40, Psychoeducation = 34, TAU = 10). Depressive symptoms improved in the three arms between V1 and V2 (p < 0.0001), and between V1 and V3 (p < 0.0001), and did not change between V2 and V3. At V3 no significant differences between groups were found. There were no significant differences in other measures either.

Conclusions

In our BD population we did not find superiority of adjunctive MBCT over adjunctive Psychoeducation or TAU on subsyndromal depressive symptoms; neither on anxiety, hypo/mania, relapses, or functioning.

双相情感障碍门诊患者的正念认知疗法与心理教育干预:一项随机对照试验的结果
很少有对照试验评估了正念认知疗法(MBCT)对双相情感障碍(BD)症状和功能的影响。本研究旨在评价MBCT辅助组治疗的有效性。材料和方法随机、前瞻性、多中心、单盲试验,纳入有阈下抑郁症状的bp门诊患者。参与者被随机分配到三个组:照常治疗(TAU);TAU +心理教育;TAU + MBCT。主要观察指标为Hamilton-D评分的变化;次要终点是焦虑、躁狂症状和功能改善的改变。分别在基线(V1)、8周(V2)和6个月(V3)对患者进行评估。主要假设辅助MBCT比心理教育更能改善抑郁症状。结果共纳入受试者84例(MBCT = 40,心理教育= 34,TAU = 10)。在V1和V2之间的三个组中,抑郁症状有所改善(p <0.0001), V1和V3之间(p <0.0001),并且在V2和V3之间没有变化。在V3时,各组间无显著差异。其他指标也无显著差异。结论在我们的BD人群中,我们没有发现辅助MBCT比辅助心理教育或TAU在亚综合征抑郁症状方面有优势;既不焦虑,也不躁狂,也不复发,也不正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信