A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs

IF 2.9 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Alec Barlow, Kayla Roy, Kristopher Hawkins, Ako A. Ankarah, Benjamin Rosenthal
{"title":"A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs","authors":"Alec Barlow,&nbsp;Kayla Roy,&nbsp;Kristopher Hawkins,&nbsp;Ako A. Ankarah,&nbsp;Benjamin Rosenthal","doi":"10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of <em>Trichinella</em> larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37941,"journal":{"name":"Food and Waterborne Parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Waterborne Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405676621000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion.

Abstract Image

旋毛虫监测项目检测与保证方法综述
虽然自猪肉监管开始以来,全球旋毛虫病病例有所下降,但这种疾病仍然对猪肉和动物猎物的消费者构成威胁,对生产者构成责任。管理食品安全风险和支持农业贸易需要具有成本效益和敏感的诊断方法。有几种方法可以检验猪肉是否有寄生虫感染。在这里,我们回顾了有关这些方法的敏感性、特异性和成本的文献。结果表明,人工消化结合光学显微镜法具有成本效益高、特异性强、可靠性好等优点。血清学技术如ELISA对猪的流行病学监测是有用的。虽然目前的PCR技术在诊断物种特异性感染方面是快速和有用的,但它们在大规模检测方面并不具有成本效益。然而,随着包括横向流动重组酶聚合酶扩增(LF-RPA)在内的PCR技术的改进和成本的不断降低,这些方法最终可能会成功实现人工消化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Waterborne Parasitology
Food and Waterborne Parasitology Immunology and Microbiology-Parasitology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Waterborne Parasitology publishes high quality papers containing original research findings, investigative reports, and scientific proceedings on parasites which are transmitted to humans via the consumption of food or water. The relevant parasites include protozoa, nematodes, cestodes and trematodes which are transmitted by food or water and capable of infecting humans. Pertinent food includes products of animal or plant origin which are domestic or wild, and consumed by humans. Animals and plants from both terrestrial and aquatic sources are included, as well as studies related to potable and other types of water which serve to harbor, perpetuate or disseminate food and waterborne parasites. Studies dealing with prevalence, transmission, epidemiology, risk assessment and mitigation, including control measures and test methodologies for parasites in food and water are of particular interest. Evidence of the emergence of such parasites and interactions among domestic animals, wildlife and humans are of interest. The impact of parasites on the health and welfare of humans is viewed as very important and within scope of the journal. Manuscripts with scientifically generated information on associations between food and waterborne parasitic diseases and lifestyle, culture and economies are also welcome. Studies involving animal experiments must meet the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals as issued by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信