Quantitative T2 Mapping to Discriminate Mucinous from Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma in Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Diffusion-weighted Imaging.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-21 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0067
Junqin Zhang, Yuxi Ge, Heng Zhang, Zi Wang, Weiqiang Dou, Shudong Hu
{"title":"Quantitative T2 Mapping to Discriminate Mucinous from Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma in Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Diffusion-weighted Imaging.","authors":"Junqin Zhang,&nbsp;Yuxi Ge,&nbsp;Heng Zhang,&nbsp;Zi Wang,&nbsp;Weiqiang Dou,&nbsp;Shudong Hu","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) is associated with worse clinicopathological characteristics and a poorer prognosis than non-MA. Moreover, MA is related to worse tumor regression grade and tumor downstaging than non-MA. This study investigated whether lesions in MA and non-MA can be quantitatively assessed by T2 mapping technique and compared with the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-resolution MRI, DWI, and T2 mapping were performed on 81 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer via biopsy. Afterward, T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were manually measured by a senior and a junior radiologist independently. By examining surgical specimens, the patients with MA and non-MA were identified. Inter-observer reproducibility was tested, and T2 and ADC values were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 patients, 11 patients with MA were confirmed by pathology. The inter-observer reproducibility of T2 and ADC values showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.993 and 0.913, respectively. MA had higher T2 (87.9 ± 5.11 ms) (P = 0.000) and ADC (2.03 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) (P = 0.000) values than non-MA (66.6 ± 6.86 ms and 1.17 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, respectively). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of the T2 and ADC values were 0.999 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.953-1) and 0.979 (95% CI: 0.920-0.998), respectively. When the cutoff value in T2 mapping was 80 ms, the Youden index was the largest, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a stable quantitative sequence, T2 mapping of MRI is useful in differentiating MA from non-MA. Compared to ADC values, T2 values are also diagnostically effective and non-inferior to ADC values.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/89/mrms-21-593.PMC9618932.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) is associated with worse clinicopathological characteristics and a poorer prognosis than non-MA. Moreover, MA is related to worse tumor regression grade and tumor downstaging than non-MA. This study investigated whether lesions in MA and non-MA can be quantitatively assessed by T2 mapping technique and compared with the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Methods: High-resolution MRI, DWI, and T2 mapping were performed on 81 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer via biopsy. Afterward, T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were manually measured by a senior and a junior radiologist independently. By examining surgical specimens, the patients with MA and non-MA were identified. Inter-observer reproducibility was tested, and T2 and ADC values were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the cut-off value.

Results: Of the 81 patients, 11 patients with MA were confirmed by pathology. The inter-observer reproducibility of T2 and ADC values showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.993 and 0.913, respectively. MA had higher T2 (87.9 ± 5.11 ms) (P = 0.000) and ADC (2.03 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P = 0.000) values than non-MA (66.6 ± 6.86 ms and 1.17 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of the T2 and ADC values were 0.999 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.953-1) and 0.979 (95% CI: 0.920-0.998), respectively. When the cutoff value in T2 mapping was 80 ms, the Youden index was the largest, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 97%.

Conclusion: As a stable quantitative sequence, T2 mapping of MRI is useful in differentiating MA from non-MA. Compared to ADC values, T2 values are also diagnostically effective and non-inferior to ADC values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

定量T2定位鉴别直肠粘液腺癌与非粘液腺癌:与弥散加权成像的比较。
目的:黏液性腺癌(MA)与非MA相比具有更差的临床病理特征和更差的预后。此外,与非MA相比,MA与更差的肿瘤消退等级和肿瘤降期相关。本研究探讨了T2成像技术是否可以定量评估MA和非MA病变,并与DWI进行比较。方法:对81例经活检诊断为直肠癌的患者进行高分辨率MRI、DWI和T2制图。随后,T2和表观扩散系数(ADC)值分别由一名高级放射科医生和一名初级放射科医生独立手动测量。通过检查手术标本,确定MA和非MA患者。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较T2和ADC值。最后绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定截止值。结果:81例患者中,11例经病理证实为MA。T2和ADC值在观察者间的重复性显示出优异的类内相关系数(ICC),分别为0.993和0.913。MA组T2值(87.9±5.11 ms) (P = 0.000)和ADC值(2.03 × 10-3 mm2/s)均高于非MA组(分别为66.6±6.86 ms和1.17 × 10-3 mm2/s)。T2和ADC值的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.999(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.953-1)和0.979 (95% CI: 0.920-0.998)。T2测图截断值为80 ms时,约登指数最大,敏感性为100%,特异性为97%。结论:MRI T2图谱作为一个稳定的定量序列,可用于鉴别MA与非MA。与ADC值相比,T2值在诊断上也是有效的,且不逊于ADC值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信