A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee with Active Control.

IF 1.1 Q4 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-02 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.46582/jsrm.1701002
Joseph J Ruane, Andrew Ross, Victoria Zigmont, Deanna McClure, Gregg Gascon
{"title":"A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee with Active Control.","authors":"Joseph J Ruane,&nbsp;Andrew Ross,&nbsp;Victoria Zigmont,&nbsp;Deanna McClure,&nbsp;Gregg Gascon","doi":"10.46582/jsrm.1701002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Osteoarthritis is most prevalent in the knee and drives the growing incidence of total knee arthroplasty. There is a need to explore non-surgical treatment options to increase the portfolio of alternatives available. The study aimed to determine the clinical response to an autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injection compared to an active comparator. <b>Methods</b>: The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled pilot study. Participants with diagnosed knee osteoarthritis were allocated to one of two treatment groups to receive a BMAC injection immediately followed by a PRP injection or a single injection of Gel-One® crosslinked hyaluronate (HA). Outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. <b>Results</b>: Significant improvements were observed in both treatment groups for all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales with the exception of the symptoms assessment at 12 months in the HA group. BMAC KOOS scores peaked at 12 months, while HA KOOS scores generally peaked at 6 months. The gap in mean scores at 12 months in favor of the BMAC group did not reach statistical significance. Secondary outcomes included a greater reduction in pain at 12 months in the BMAC group (-3.13 points; 95% CI: -3.96, -3.29) compared to the HA group (-1.56 points; 95% CI: -2.59, -0.53; p= 0.02) via the numeric pain rating scale. <b>Conclusions</b>: Results demonstrate that both treatment groups experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement across the KOOS subscales. While BMAC has shown promise in the treatment of knee OA, there is a need for multi-center investigations with larger sample sizes, an extended follow-up, and placebo-based control. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02958267.</p>","PeriodicalId":17155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372416/pdf/jsrm_17_03.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46582/jsrm.1701002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is most prevalent in the knee and drives the growing incidence of total knee arthroplasty. There is a need to explore non-surgical treatment options to increase the portfolio of alternatives available. The study aimed to determine the clinical response to an autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injection compared to an active comparator. Methods: The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled pilot study. Participants with diagnosed knee osteoarthritis were allocated to one of two treatment groups to receive a BMAC injection immediately followed by a PRP injection or a single injection of Gel-One® crosslinked hyaluronate (HA). Outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Results: Significant improvements were observed in both treatment groups for all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales with the exception of the symptoms assessment at 12 months in the HA group. BMAC KOOS scores peaked at 12 months, while HA KOOS scores generally peaked at 6 months. The gap in mean scores at 12 months in favor of the BMAC group did not reach statistical significance. Secondary outcomes included a greater reduction in pain at 12 months in the BMAC group (-3.13 points; 95% CI: -3.96, -3.29) compared to the HA group (-1.56 points; 95% CI: -2.59, -0.53; p= 0.02) via the numeric pain rating scale. Conclusions: Results demonstrate that both treatment groups experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement across the KOOS subscales. While BMAC has shown promise in the treatment of knee OA, there is a need for multi-center investigations with larger sample sizes, an extended follow-up, and placebo-based control. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02958267.

间充质干细胞治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的单盲随机对照试验。
背景:骨关节炎是膝关节最常见的疾病,导致全膝关节置换术的发病率不断上升。有必要探索非手术治疗方案,以增加可用的替代方案组合。该研究旨在确定与活性比较物相比,自体骨髓浓缩物(BMAC)和富血小板血浆(PRP)关节内注射的临床反应。方法:本研究为前瞻性、单盲、随机对照先导研究。诊断为膝骨关节炎的参与者被分配到两个治疗组中的一个,接受BMAC注射,紧接着接受PRP注射或单次注射Gel-One®交联透明质酸(HA)。在治疗后3个月、6个月和12个月评估结果。结果:除HA组12个月时的症状评估外,两个治疗组在所有膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)亚量表上均观察到显著改善。BMAC kos评分在12个月时达到峰值,而HA kos评分一般在6个月时达到峰值。BMAC组在12个月时的平均得分差距没有达到统计学意义。次要结果包括BMAC组在12个月时疼痛的更大减轻(-3.13分;95% CI: -3.96, -3.29)与HA组相比(-1.56点;95% ci: -2.59, -0.53;P = 0.02)。结论:结果表明两个治疗组在kos亚量表上均有临床和统计学上的显著改善。虽然BMAC在治疗膝关节OA方面显示出前景,但仍需要更大样本量的多中心研究,延长随访时间,并以安慰剂为基础的对照。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02958267。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信