A Protocol for the Development of the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards Criteria: The ICARUS Project.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-08-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.29337/ijsp.155
Giovanni Cacciamani, Tamir Sholklapper, Rene Sotelo, Mihir Desai, Inderbir Gill
{"title":"A Protocol for the Development of the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards Criteria: The ICARUS Project.","authors":"Giovanni Cacciamani,&nbsp;Tamir Sholklapper,&nbsp;Rene Sotelo,&nbsp;Mihir Desai,&nbsp;Inderbir Gill","doi":"10.29337/ijsp.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perioperative complications, especially intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), carry significant potential for long-term sequelae in a patient's postoperative course. These events represent a substantial gap in contemporary surgical literature, with only a fraction of publications reporting intraoperative complications as outcomes of interest. To date, there is no universal standard for comprehensively reporting intraoperative complications in surgical practice and literature beyond the systems developed for grading individual events. We aim to establish a set of best-practice criteria for iAE reporting known as the <b>I</b>ntraoperative <b>C</b>omplication <b>A</b>ssessment and <b>R</b>eporting with <b>U</b>niversal <b>S</b>tandards (<b>ICARUS</b>) Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will generate the ICARUS reporting guidelines using the EQUATOR Network development framework and the SQUIRE Guidelines. The initial step involves an umbrella review and meta-analysis of systemic reviews (SRs) assessing the perioperative adverse events of common surgeries. Measures for assessing, collecting, grading, and reporting the iAEs will be merged into a comprehensive list of criteria. Using a modified Delphi methodology, a team of expert surgeons (≥ 200 inpatient procedures/years) will contribute to and evaluate the proposed reporting guidelines. The panel will evaluate both the clinical usefulness and quality assessment and improvement utility of each criterion using a 5-point Likert. We expect multiple survey rounds until consensus regarding the utility of the guidelines is reached.</p><p><strong>Dissemination: </strong>We plan to share then validate the newly developed guidelines within each surgical field. Dissemination will involve publicly shared guidelines, simultaneous journal publications, conference presentations, encouragement for journal endorsement, and application for inclusion in the Equator Network database. The study team plans to continue collecting feedback for future extension of the intraoperative reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Intraoperative adverse events are underreported and lack homogeneity in surgical literatureWe aim to use a modified Delphi methodology to develop the consensus-based, intraoperative complications assessment and reporting with universal standards (ICARUS) guidelinesWe will disseminate the ICARUS guidelines through journal publications and presentations at national and international meetings; journals and professional organizations will be encouraged to endorse the ICARUS guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344953/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Introduction: Perioperative complications, especially intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), carry significant potential for long-term sequelae in a patient's postoperative course. These events represent a substantial gap in contemporary surgical literature, with only a fraction of publications reporting intraoperative complications as outcomes of interest. To date, there is no universal standard for comprehensively reporting intraoperative complications in surgical practice and literature beyond the systems developed for grading individual events. We aim to establish a set of best-practice criteria for iAE reporting known as the Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Guidelines.

Methods and analysis: We will generate the ICARUS reporting guidelines using the EQUATOR Network development framework and the SQUIRE Guidelines. The initial step involves an umbrella review and meta-analysis of systemic reviews (SRs) assessing the perioperative adverse events of common surgeries. Measures for assessing, collecting, grading, and reporting the iAEs will be merged into a comprehensive list of criteria. Using a modified Delphi methodology, a team of expert surgeons (≥ 200 inpatient procedures/years) will contribute to and evaluate the proposed reporting guidelines. The panel will evaluate both the clinical usefulness and quality assessment and improvement utility of each criterion using a 5-point Likert. We expect multiple survey rounds until consensus regarding the utility of the guidelines is reached.

Dissemination: We plan to share then validate the newly developed guidelines within each surgical field. Dissemination will involve publicly shared guidelines, simultaneous journal publications, conference presentations, encouragement for journal endorsement, and application for inclusion in the Equator Network database. The study team plans to continue collecting feedback for future extension of the intraoperative reporting guidelines.

Highlights: Intraoperative adverse events are underreported and lack homogeneity in surgical literatureWe aim to use a modified Delphi methodology to develop the consensus-based, intraoperative complications assessment and reporting with universal standards (ICARUS) guidelinesWe will disseminate the ICARUS guidelines through journal publications and presentations at national and international meetings; journals and professional organizations will be encouraged to endorse the ICARUS guidelines.

Abstract Image

采用通用标准制定术中并发症评估和报告的方案:ICARUS项目。
前言:围手术期并发症,尤其是术中不良事件(iae),在患者术后过程中具有潜在的长期后遗症。这些事件代表了当代外科文献的巨大差距,只有一小部分出版物报道术中并发症作为感兴趣的结果。迄今为止,除了为个别事件分级开发的系统外,在外科实践和文献中还没有全面报告术中并发症的通用标准。我们的目标是建立一套iAE报告的最佳实践标准,即术中并发症评估和报告通用标准(ICARUS)指南。方法和分析:我们将使用EQUATOR网络开发框架和SQUIRE指南生成ICARUS报告指南。第一步包括对评估常见手术围手术期不良事件的系统评价(SRs)进行总括性回顾和荟萃分析。评估、收集、评分和报告iae的措施将合并为一个全面的标准清单。采用改进的德尔菲方法,一组专家外科医生(≥200例住院手术/年)将参与并评估拟议的报告指南。专家组将使用5点李克特量表评估每个标准的临床有效性、质量评估和改进效用。我们期望进行多轮调查,直到就指南的效用达成共识。传播:我们计划在每个外科领域分享并验证新制定的指南。传播将包括公开分享指南、同时出版期刊、会议发言、鼓励期刊认可以及申请纳入赤道网数据库。研究小组计划继续收集反馈,以便将来扩展术中报告指南。重点:手术文献中术中不良事件的报道不足且缺乏同一性。我们的目标是使用改进的德尔菲方法来制定基于共识的术中并发症评估和报告通用标准(ICARUS)指南。我们将通过期刊出版物和在国家和国际会议上的演讲来传播ICARUS指南;将鼓励期刊和专业组织支持ICARUS指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信