What are the participants' perspective and the system-based impact of a standardized, inter-professional morbidity/mortality-conferences in a children's hospital?

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-20-42
Martin Stocker, Philipp Szavay, Birgit Wernz, Thomas J Neuhaus, Dirk Lehnick, Sabine Zundel
{"title":"What are the participants' perspective and the system-based impact of a standardized, inter-professional morbidity/mortality-conferences in a children's hospital?","authors":"Martin Stocker,&nbsp;Philipp Szavay,&nbsp;Birgit Wernz,&nbsp;Thomas J Neuhaus,&nbsp;Dirk Lehnick,&nbsp;Sabine Zundel","doi":"10.21037/tgh-20-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morbidity and mortality conferences (MMC) are well established but little data exists on inter-professional aspects, system-based outcomes and characteristics in pediatric departments. Our study aim was to analyze the system-based impact and to assess participant's perspectives on standardized, inter-professional MMCs in a children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective observational analysis the inter-professional MMCs held at a tertiary teaching children's hospital in Switzerland were analyzed for (I) resulting clinical consequences and (II) participants perception on format, usefulness and no-blame atmosphere.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen MMC, discussing 29 cases were analyzed. Twenty-seven clinical errors/problems were identified and 17 clinical recommendations were developed: ten new or changed clinical guidelines, two new therapeutic alternatives, three new teaching activities, and two guidelines on specific diagnostics. Altogether, the 466 participants evaluated the conferences favorably. Little differences were seen in the evaluations of physicians of different disciplines or seniority but non-physicians scored all questions lower than physicians. Overall, three quarters of the participants felt that there was a no-blame culture during the conferences but results varied depending on the cases discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inter-professional MMC can have relevant impact on clinical practice and affect system-based changes. Inter-professional conferences are profitable for all participants but evaluated differently according to profession. A standardized format and the presence of a moderator are helpful, but not a guarantee for a no-blame culture. Highly emotional cases are a risk factor to relapse to \"blame and shame\". A time gap between the event and the MMC may have a beneficial effect.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Inter-professional communication; inter-professional health care; learning from failure; morbidity and mortality conference (MMC); patient safety; psychological safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23267,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343410/pdf/tgh-06-20-42.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-20-42","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morbidity and mortality conferences (MMC) are well established but little data exists on inter-professional aspects, system-based outcomes and characteristics in pediatric departments. Our study aim was to analyze the system-based impact and to assess participant's perspectives on standardized, inter-professional MMCs in a children's hospital.

Methods: In a prospective observational analysis the inter-professional MMCs held at a tertiary teaching children's hospital in Switzerland were analyzed for (I) resulting clinical consequences and (II) participants perception on format, usefulness and no-blame atmosphere.

Results: Eighteen MMC, discussing 29 cases were analyzed. Twenty-seven clinical errors/problems were identified and 17 clinical recommendations were developed: ten new or changed clinical guidelines, two new therapeutic alternatives, three new teaching activities, and two guidelines on specific diagnostics. Altogether, the 466 participants evaluated the conferences favorably. Little differences were seen in the evaluations of physicians of different disciplines or seniority but non-physicians scored all questions lower than physicians. Overall, three quarters of the participants felt that there was a no-blame culture during the conferences but results varied depending on the cases discussed.

Conclusions: An inter-professional MMC can have relevant impact on clinical practice and affect system-based changes. Inter-professional conferences are profitable for all participants but evaluated differently according to profession. A standardized format and the presence of a moderator are helpful, but not a guarantee for a no-blame culture. Highly emotional cases are a risk factor to relapse to "blame and shame". A time gap between the event and the MMC may have a beneficial effect.

Keywords: Inter-professional communication; inter-professional health care; learning from failure; morbidity and mortality conference (MMC); patient safety; psychological safety.

Abstract Image

在儿童医院召开标准化的跨专业发病率/死亡率会议,与会者的观点和基于系统的影响是什么?
背景:发病率和死亡率会议(MMC)建立得很好,但关于儿科跨专业方面、基于系统的结果和特征的数据很少。我们的研究目的是分析基于系统的影响,并评估参与者对儿童医院标准化、跨专业mmc的看法。方法:在一项前瞻性观察分析中,对瑞士一家三级教学儿童医院举办的跨专业mmc进行了(I)临床结果和(II)参与者对形式、有用性和无责备氛围的感知分析。结果:分析MMC 18例,讨论29例。确定了27个临床错误/问题,并制定了17项临床建议:10项新的或修改的临床指南,2项新的治疗方案,3项新的教学活动,以及2项关于特定诊断的指南。总的来说,466名参与者对会议的评价是积极的。不同学科或资历的医生的评价差异不大,但非医生在所有问题上的得分都低于医生。总体而言,四分之三的参与者认为会议期间存在一种不责备的文化,但结果因讨论的案例而异。结论:跨专业MMC可以对临床实践产生相关影响,并影响系统变革。跨专业会议对所有参与者都是有益的,但根据专业评估不同。标准化的格式和版主的存在是有帮助的,但并不能保证没有责备的文化。高度情绪化的案例是重新陷入“责备和羞耻”的风险因素。事件和MMC之间的时间间隔可能会产生有益的影响。关键词:跨专业沟通;跨专业保健;从失败中学习;发病率和死亡率会议;病人安全;心理上的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol; TGH; Online ISSN 2415-1289) is an open-access, peer-reviewed online journal that focuses on cutting-edge findings in the field of translational research in gastroenterology and hepatology and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal, pancreas, gallbladder and hepatic diseases. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, biology, pathology, and technical advances related to gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases. Contributions pertinent to gastroenterology and hepatology are also included from related fields such as nutrition, surgery, public health, human genetics, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信