Value of Personalized Dementia-Specific Quality of Life Scales: An Explorative Study in 3 European Countries.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Iris Hendriks, Raquel Demetrio, Franka J M Meiland, Rabih Chattat, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Teake P Ettema, Shirley B Evans, Dawn Brooker, Simon C Evans, Teresa Atkinson, Elisabetta Farina, Francesca L Saibene, Debby L Gerritsen, Rose-Marie Dröes
{"title":"Value of Personalized Dementia-Specific Quality of Life Scales: An Explorative Study in 3 European Countries.","authors":"Iris Hendriks, Raquel Demetrio, Franka J M Meiland, Rabih Chattat, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Teake P Ettema, Shirley B Evans, Dawn Brooker, Simon C Evans, Teresa Atkinson, Elisabetta Farina, Francesca L Saibene, Debby L Gerritsen, Rose-Marie Dröes","doi":"10.1177/15333175211033721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring Quality of Life (QOL) can be difficult due to its individual character. To explore the value of personalized QOL measurement for people with dementia, personalized versions of two dementia-specific QOL scales (Dementia quality of Life (DQoL) and Quaility of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)) were constructed. This study investigated whether the personalized measures are more valid to detect variations in QOL than their standard versions for people with mild to moderate dementia, with sufficient internal consistency. Moreover, the relationship between the personalized QOL measures and severity of dementia was investigated. Finally, the study explored the differences between countries regarding the personalized overall QOL and differences in the importance of QOL domains. This explorative one-group design study used baseline data from the MEETINGDEM study into the implementation of the Meeting Centres Support Programme in Italy, Poland and the UK. The personalized versions of the DQoL and QoL-AD were reliable, but not more valid than their standard versions. No relationship between severity of dementia and personalized QOL was found. While no differences were found between countries for the overall QOL score, some QOL domains were valued differently: people with dementia from the UK rated self-esteem, mood, physical health, energy level and the ability to do chores around the house significantly less important than people from Italy and Poland. The personalized versions of the DQoL and QoL-AD may offer dementia care practice important insights into what domains contribute most to an individual's QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15333175211033721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring Quality of Life (QOL) can be difficult due to its individual character. To explore the value of personalized QOL measurement for people with dementia, personalized versions of two dementia-specific QOL scales (Dementia quality of Life (DQoL) and Quaility of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)) were constructed. This study investigated whether the personalized measures are more valid to detect variations in QOL than their standard versions for people with mild to moderate dementia, with sufficient internal consistency. Moreover, the relationship between the personalized QOL measures and severity of dementia was investigated. Finally, the study explored the differences between countries regarding the personalized overall QOL and differences in the importance of QOL domains. This explorative one-group design study used baseline data from the MEETINGDEM study into the implementation of the Meeting Centres Support Programme in Italy, Poland and the UK. The personalized versions of the DQoL and QoL-AD were reliable, but not more valid than their standard versions. No relationship between severity of dementia and personalized QOL was found. While no differences were found between countries for the overall QOL score, some QOL domains were valued differently: people with dementia from the UK rated self-esteem, mood, physical health, energy level and the ability to do chores around the house significantly less important than people from Italy and Poland. The personalized versions of the DQoL and QoL-AD may offer dementia care practice important insights into what domains contribute most to an individual's QOL.

个性化痴呆症生活质量量表的价值:在三个欧洲国家进行的探索性研究
由于生活质量(QOL)具有个性化特征,因此很难对其进行测量。为了探索个性化 QOL 测量对痴呆症患者的价值,我们构建了两个痴呆症专用 QOL 量表(痴呆症生活质量量表(DQoL)和阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QoL-AD))的个性化版本。本研究调查了个性化量表在检测轻度至中度痴呆症患者生活质量的变化方面是否比其标准版本更有效,并具有足够的内部一致性。此外,研究还探讨了个性化 QOL 测量与痴呆症严重程度之间的关系。最后,研究还探讨了不同国家在个性化整体 QOL 方面的差异以及 QOL 领域重要性的差异。这项探索性的单组设计研究使用了意大利、波兰和英国实施会诊中心支持计划的 MEETINGDEM 研究的基线数据。个性化版本的 DQoL 和 QoL-AD 是可靠的,但并不比其标准版本更有效。痴呆症的严重程度与个性化 QOL 之间没有关系。虽然各国的 QOL 总分没有差异,但对某些 QOL 领域的重视程度却有所不同:英国痴呆症患者对自尊、情绪、身体健康、精力水平和家务能力的重视程度明显低于意大利和波兰患者。个性化版本的 DQoL 和 QoL-AD 可能会为痴呆症护理实践提供重要启示,让人们了解哪些领域对个人的 QOL 贡献最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信