Allergy Practices in Otorhinolaryngology Residency Programs in Turkey: Quo Vadis?

IF 0.7 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-30 DOI:10.4274/tao.2021.6160
Erdem Mengi, Cüneyt Orhan Kara, Bülent Topuz
{"title":"Allergy Practices in Otorhinolaryngology Residency Programs in Turkey: Quo Vadis?","authors":"Erdem Mengi,&nbsp;Cüneyt Orhan Kara,&nbsp;Bülent Topuz","doi":"10.4274/tao.2021.6160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate how allergy practices in the otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency departments in Turkey have changed over the last 20 years and to examine the current status in ORL residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 17-item questionnaire was developed following the study goals by a team experienced in allergy practices. The questionnaire was sent via e-mail to the program directors of all the 95 ORL residency departments in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 (63.2%) program directors completed the questionnaire. We found that allergy testing and immunotherapy had been performed in 70% and 28.3%, respectively, at any time to date. The most common reason for discontinuing in allergy practices over time was \"the changes introduced by the Turkish Social Security Institute as stated in the healthcare implementation communiqué\" and \"the difficulties in obtaining vaccine supplies from companies\". Of all departments, allergy testing, immunotherapy, nasal smear, and nasal provocation tests were performed only by 35%, 8.3%, 28.3%, and 1.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allergy practices have been increasingly used, especially in the 2000s, but came to a standstill upon the changes introduced by the Turkish Social Security Institute as stated in the healthcare implementation communiqué. These findings suggest that allergy training, in the recent years, has remained in the background in ORL residency programs in Turkey. To achieve standardization in allergy training in ORL residency programs, professional associations and authorities should develop solutions in cooperation with legislators.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"59 2","pages":"118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/f2/tao-59-118.PMC8329395.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2021.6160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate how allergy practices in the otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency departments in Turkey have changed over the last 20 years and to examine the current status in ORL residency training.

Methods: A 17-item questionnaire was developed following the study goals by a team experienced in allergy practices. The questionnaire was sent via e-mail to the program directors of all the 95 ORL residency departments in Turkey.

Results: A total of 60 (63.2%) program directors completed the questionnaire. We found that allergy testing and immunotherapy had been performed in 70% and 28.3%, respectively, at any time to date. The most common reason for discontinuing in allergy practices over time was "the changes introduced by the Turkish Social Security Institute as stated in the healthcare implementation communiqué" and "the difficulties in obtaining vaccine supplies from companies". Of all departments, allergy testing, immunotherapy, nasal smear, and nasal provocation tests were performed only by 35%, 8.3%, 28.3%, and 1.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: Allergy practices have been increasingly used, especially in the 2000s, but came to a standstill upon the changes introduced by the Turkish Social Security Institute as stated in the healthcare implementation communiqué. These findings suggest that allergy training, in the recent years, has remained in the background in ORL residency programs in Turkey. To achieve standardization in allergy training in ORL residency programs, professional associations and authorities should develop solutions in cooperation with legislators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

土耳其耳鼻喉科住院医师项目的过敏实践:现状?
目的:本研究的目的是调查土耳其耳鼻喉科(ORL)住院医师部门的过敏实践在过去20年中发生了怎样的变化,并检查ORL住院医师培训的现状。方法:一个有过敏实践经验的团队根据研究目标制定了一份17项的调查问卷。问卷通过电子邮件发送给土耳其所有95个ORL住院医师部门的项目主管。结果:共60名项目主任(63.2%)完成了问卷调查。我们发现,到目前为止,分别有70%和28.3%的患者在任何时候进行了过敏试验和免疫治疗。随着时间的推移,停止过敏治疗的最常见原因是"土耳其社会安全研究所在医疗保健实施公报中提出的变化"和"从公司获得疫苗供应的困难"。在所有科室中,过敏试验、免疫治疗、鼻涂片和鼻激发试验分别仅占35%、8.3%、28.3%和1.7%。结论:过敏实践越来越多地使用,特别是在2000年代,但在医疗保健实施公报中指出,土耳其社会安全研究所引入的变化使其停滞不前。这些发现表明,近年来,过敏训练在土耳其的ORL住院医师项目中一直处于背景地位。为了实现ORL住院医师项目过敏培训的标准化,专业协会和当局应与立法者合作制定解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信