Subgroup Analysis of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Showing Cognitive Resilience.

John J Randolph, Jennifer S Randolph, Heather A Wishart
{"title":"Subgroup Analysis of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Showing Cognitive Resilience.","authors":"John J Randolph,&nbsp;Jennifer S Randolph,&nbsp;Heather A Wishart","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acab067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is known to occur in many individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, little is currently known about MS patients without cognitive impairment, including protective factors associated with intact cognition. The present study considered these issues in a sample of MS patients screened for intact subjective and objective cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two MS participant groups from a larger sample were derived: i) participants within 1 standard deviation of controls on measures of objective cognition, subjective cognition, and informant-observed subjective cognition [cognitively resilient MS group (MScr)], and ii) those classified as not cognitively resilient (MSncr). Both groups were compared with age- and gender-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated that the MScr group was similar to the MSncr group on most disease and demographic variables, and level of fatigue. The MScr group showed higher estimated baseline intellectual ability and reported less anxiety, subclinical depressive symptoms, and pain interference. MScr participants also showed a trend toward more reported compensatory cognitive strategy use than MSncr participants. The MScr group showed comparable reading recognition and pain symptoms to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide preliminary information on factors associated with cognitive resilience in MS. Future research should examine resilient individuals with MS to further clarify positive outcomes in this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"302-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive dysfunction is known to occur in many individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, little is currently known about MS patients without cognitive impairment, including protective factors associated with intact cognition. The present study considered these issues in a sample of MS patients screened for intact subjective and objective cognitive functioning.

Methods: Two MS participant groups from a larger sample were derived: i) participants within 1 standard deviation of controls on measures of objective cognition, subjective cognition, and informant-observed subjective cognition [cognitively resilient MS group (MScr)], and ii) those classified as not cognitively resilient (MSncr). Both groups were compared with age- and gender-matched controls.

Results: Findings indicated that the MScr group was similar to the MSncr group on most disease and demographic variables, and level of fatigue. The MScr group showed higher estimated baseline intellectual ability and reported less anxiety, subclinical depressive symptoms, and pain interference. MScr participants also showed a trend toward more reported compensatory cognitive strategy use than MSncr participants. The MScr group showed comparable reading recognition and pain symptoms to controls.

Conclusions: Our findings provide preliminary information on factors associated with cognitive resilience in MS. Future research should examine resilient individuals with MS to further clarify positive outcomes in this condition.

显示认知弹性的多发性硬化症患者的亚组分析。
目的:认知功能障碍已知发生在许多多发性硬化症(MS)患者中。然而,目前对没有认知障碍的MS患者知之甚少,包括与完整认知相关的保护因素。目前的研究考虑了这些问题,在一个样本的MS患者筛选完整的主观和客观认知功能。方法:从更大的样本中得出两个MS参与者组:i)在客观认知、主观认知和被调查者观察到的主观认知(认知弹性MS组(MScr))的测量值与对照组的标准差范围内的参与者[认知弹性MS组(MScr)], ii)被归类为非认知弹性MS组(MSncr)。两组都与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了比较。结果:研究结果表明,MScr组与MSncr组在大多数疾病和人口统计学变量以及疲劳水平上相似。MScr组显示出更高的基线智力,并报告了更少的焦虑、亚临床抑郁症状和疼痛干扰。MScr参与者也表现出比MSncr参与者更多的代偿性认知策略使用的趋势。MScr组表现出与对照组相当的阅读识别和疼痛症状。结论:我们的研究结果提供了MS认知弹性相关因素的初步信息,未来的研究应该检查MS患者的弹性,以进一步阐明这种情况下的积极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信