Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-12 DOI:10.1080/01478885.2021.1951053
C Broomfield, N Meis, J Johnson, D Regan, K McGilvray, C Puttlitz
{"title":"Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.","authors":"C Broomfield,&nbsp;N Meis,&nbsp;J Johnson,&nbsp;D Regan,&nbsp;K McGilvray,&nbsp;C Puttlitz","doi":"10.1080/01478885.2021.1951053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many published methods of decalcifying bone for paraffin histology; however, the current literature lacks details regarding the processing of ovine tissue. Ovine bone tissue presents challenges, as samples are often denser and larger than other comparative animal models, thus increasing decalcification times. Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFAA) has previously been used to decalcify ovine bone samples for histological analysis. Unfortunately, TFAA is a strong acid and often results in loss of cellular detail, especially in the connected soft tissue. This is generally manifested as over staining with eosin, and a decrease in cellular features which impacts overall histological interpretation. It is well known that leaving tissue in acid for long periods degrades cellular detail; therefore, minimizing decalcification time is critical to accurately determine cellular morphology. Six decalcification solutions (8% TFAA, 20% TFAA, 8% formic acid, 20% formic acid, Formical-4, and XLCal, and three temperatures (room temperature, 30°C, 37°C), were examined to determine their effects on cellular detail in ovine vertebrae and humeral heads. These data clearly indicate that 20% formic acid at 30°C yielded better decalcification rates (2.6 d ± 0.9 d) and cellular detail (none to mild changes) for the vertebrae samples, and 20% formic acid at RT yielded the best cellular detail (none to minimal loss) for humerus samples with a moderate amount of time (6.5 d ± 1.7). These results should establish the optimal demineralization procedures for ovine bone used in scientific studies resulting in improved cellular detail while minimizing decalcification times.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367626/pdf/nihms-1827771.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2021.1951053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There are many published methods of decalcifying bone for paraffin histology; however, the current literature lacks details regarding the processing of ovine tissue. Ovine bone tissue presents challenges, as samples are often denser and larger than other comparative animal models, thus increasing decalcification times. Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFAA) has previously been used to decalcify ovine bone samples for histological analysis. Unfortunately, TFAA is a strong acid and often results in loss of cellular detail, especially in the connected soft tissue. This is generally manifested as over staining with eosin, and a decrease in cellular features which impacts overall histological interpretation. It is well known that leaving tissue in acid for long periods degrades cellular detail; therefore, minimizing decalcification time is critical to accurately determine cellular morphology. Six decalcification solutions (8% TFAA, 20% TFAA, 8% formic acid, 20% formic acid, Formical-4, and XLCal, and three temperatures (room temperature, 30°C, 37°C), were examined to determine their effects on cellular detail in ovine vertebrae and humeral heads. These data clearly indicate that 20% formic acid at 30°C yielded better decalcification rates (2.6 d ± 0.9 d) and cellular detail (none to mild changes) for the vertebrae samples, and 20% formic acid at RT yielded the best cellular detail (none to minimal loss) for humerus samples with a moderate amount of time (6.5 d ± 1.7). These results should establish the optimal demineralization procedures for ovine bone used in scientific studies resulting in improved cellular detail while minimizing decalcification times.

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
优化羊骨脱钙增加细胞细节:参数研究。
有许多已发表的方法脱钙骨石蜡组织学;然而,目前的文献缺乏关于羊组织加工的细节。羊骨组织呈现出挑战,因为样品通常比其他比较动物模型更密集和更大,从而增加了脱钙时间。三氟乙酸(TFAA)以前被用来脱钙羊骨样本进行组织学分析。不幸的是,TFAA是一种强酸,经常导致细胞细节的丧失,特别是在连接的软组织中。这通常表现为伊红过度染色,细胞特征减少,影响整体组织学解释。众所周知,将组织长期置于酸中会使细胞细节退化;因此,最小化脱钙时间对于准确确定细胞形态至关重要。研究了六种脱钙溶液(8% TFAA、20% TFAA、8%甲酸、20%甲酸、甲醛-4和XLCal)和三种温度(室温、30°C、37°C),以确定它们对羊椎骨和肱骨头细胞细节的影响。这些数据清楚地表明,20%甲酸在30°C下对椎骨样品产生了更好的脱钙率(2.6 d±0.9 d)和细胞细节(无到轻微变化),20%甲酸在RT下对肱骨样品产生了最好的细胞细节(无到最小损失),适度时间(6.5 d±1.7)。这些结果应该为科学研究中使用的羊骨建立最佳的脱矿程序,从而改善细胞细节,同时最大限度地减少脱钙时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信