Association between falls in Alzheimer disease and scores on the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and MiniBESTest.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Somatosensory and Motor Research Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-05 DOI:10.1080/08990220.2021.1959309
Lauren Elizabeth Tueth, Gammon M Earhart, Kerri Sharp Rawson
{"title":"Association between falls in Alzheimer disease and scores on the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and MiniBESTest.","authors":"Lauren Elizabeth Tueth,&nbsp;Gammon M Earhart,&nbsp;Kerri Sharp Rawson","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2021.1959309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Falls are associated with AD and can lead to injury. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a balance measure used in other neurological conditions to predict fall risk. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between MiniBestest, BESTest, and BESTest subsection scores and fall incidence among individuals with a diagnosis of mild AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single centre, prospective, observational cohort study. Participants completed baseline questionnaires including a demographic form, a fall history questionnaire and the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Balance and gait were assessed using the MiniBESTest and BESTest. After completing baseline assessment, participants were given monthly fall calendars to track falls for the next 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MiniBESTest total raw score for fallers was 13.4 out of 28 (SD = 3.6) and for non-fallers was 18.4 of out 28 (SD = 3.7). MiniBESTest total percentage score for fallers was 47.8% (SD = 12.8%) and for non-fallers was 65.5% (SD = 13.1%). BESTest total percentage scores for fallers was 58.2% (SD = 3.9%) and for non-fallers was 73.9% (SD = 7.9%). Subsections II-IV of the BESTest correlated with faller status.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Among individuals with mild AD, fall status was associated with certain balance deficits on the BESTest including moving body outside base of support (subsection II), changing centre of mass (subsection III), and reacting to external perturbations (subsection IV). Future studies could explore differences between AD and other neurological conditions and how physical therapy could improve these areas to reduce fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08990220.2021.1959309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1959309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Falls are associated with AD and can lead to injury. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a balance measure used in other neurological conditions to predict fall risk. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between MiniBestest, BESTest, and BESTest subsection scores and fall incidence among individuals with a diagnosis of mild AD.

Methods: The study was a single centre, prospective, observational cohort study. Participants completed baseline questionnaires including a demographic form, a fall history questionnaire and the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Balance and gait were assessed using the MiniBESTest and BESTest. After completing baseline assessment, participants were given monthly fall calendars to track falls for the next 12 months.

Results: MiniBESTest total raw score for fallers was 13.4 out of 28 (SD = 3.6) and for non-fallers was 18.4 of out 28 (SD = 3.7). MiniBESTest total percentage score for fallers was 47.8% (SD = 12.8%) and for non-fallers was 65.5% (SD = 13.1%). BESTest total percentage scores for fallers was 58.2% (SD = 3.9%) and for non-fallers was 73.9% (SD = 7.9%). Subsections II-IV of the BESTest correlated with faller status.

Discussion and conclusions: Among individuals with mild AD, fall status was associated with certain balance deficits on the BESTest including moving body outside base of support (subsection II), changing centre of mass (subsection III), and reacting to external perturbations (subsection IV). Future studies could explore differences between AD and other neurological conditions and how physical therapy could improve these areas to reduce fall risk.

阿尔茨海默病的下降与平衡评估系统测试(BESTest)和MiniBESTest分数之间的关系。
背景和目的:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的痴呆症,也是美国第六大死亡原因。跌倒与阿尔茨海默病有关,并可能导致受伤。平衡评估系统测试(BESTest)是一种用于其他神经系统疾病预测跌倒风险的平衡测量方法。本研究旨在探讨轻度AD患者的MiniBestest、BESTest和BESTest分与跌倒发生率之间的关系。方法:本研究为单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。参与者完成了基线调查问卷,包括人口统计表格、跌倒史调查问卷和Barthel日常生活活动指数(ADLs)。使用MiniBESTest和BESTest评估平衡和步态。在完成基线评估后,参与者每月获得秋季日历,以跟踪未来12个月的跌倒情况。结果:跌倒者的最小得分为13.4分(SD = 3.6),非跌倒者的最小得分为18.4分(SD = 3.7)。跌倒者的MiniBESTest总分为47.8% (SD = 12.8%),非跌倒者的MiniBESTest总分为65.5% (SD = 13.1%)。跌倒者的最佳总百分比得分为58.2% (SD = 3.9%),非跌倒者的最佳总百分比得分为73.9% (SD = 7.9%)。best的第二至第四节与地位下降有关。讨论和结论:在轻度AD患者中,跌倒状态与best的某些平衡缺陷有关,包括将身体移出支撑基座(第II部分)、改变重心(第III部分)和对外部扰动的反应(第IV部分)。未来的研究可以探索AD与其他神经系统疾病之间的差异,以及如何通过物理治疗改善这些领域以降低跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Somatosensory and Motor Research
Somatosensory and Motor Research 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信