Successful strategies for including adults with intellectual disabilities in research studies that use interpretative phenomenological analysis.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING
Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2021-09-09 Epub Date: 2021-08-05 DOI:10.7748/nr.2021.e1778
Mary Drozd, Darren Chadwick, Rebecca Jester
{"title":"Successful strategies for including adults with intellectual disabilities in research studies that use interpretative phenomenological analysis.","authors":"Mary Drozd,&nbsp;Darren Chadwick,&nbsp;Rebecca Jester","doi":"10.7748/nr.2021.e1778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual disabilities are not often asked to participate in health research. This may be because researchers perceive them as unable to participate meaningfully with or without significant support and anticipate difficulty in obtaining ethical approval because of issues concerning consent and mental capacity. This means that the voices of adults with intellectual disabilities are often missing from health research and their experiences and views are unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To share successful strategies for accessing, recruiting and collecting data from a purposive sample of adults with intellectual disabilities from a study that used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>IPA is a person-centred, flexible and creative approach to research. Meaningful collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities, their families, carers, advocacy group managers, specialists in intellectual disability services and research supervisors was vital to the success of the study. The authors share practical strategies for including people with intellectual disabilities, from the perspective of a novice researcher who is an outsider to the field of intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to include people with intellectual disabilities in healthcare research. This article presents a framework to support researchers outside the specialist field of intellectual disabilities in achieving this.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Personal views and perceptions of healthcare are important if health services are to meet individual needs. Adults with intellectual disabilities often receive poor healthcare and have poorer outcomes. This will be perpetuated without their input into research. People with intellectual disabilities can make valuable contributions to the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adults with intellectual disabilities are not often asked to participate in health research. This may be because researchers perceive them as unable to participate meaningfully with or without significant support and anticipate difficulty in obtaining ethical approval because of issues concerning consent and mental capacity. This means that the voices of adults with intellectual disabilities are often missing from health research and their experiences and views are unexplored.

Aim: To share successful strategies for accessing, recruiting and collecting data from a purposive sample of adults with intellectual disabilities from a study that used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).

Discussion: IPA is a person-centred, flexible and creative approach to research. Meaningful collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities, their families, carers, advocacy group managers, specialists in intellectual disability services and research supervisors was vital to the success of the study. The authors share practical strategies for including people with intellectual disabilities, from the perspective of a novice researcher who is an outsider to the field of intellectual disability.

Conclusion: It is important to include people with intellectual disabilities in healthcare research. This article presents a framework to support researchers outside the specialist field of intellectual disabilities in achieving this.

Implications for practice: Personal views and perceptions of healthcare are important if health services are to meet individual needs. Adults with intellectual disabilities often receive poor healthcare and have poorer outcomes. This will be perpetuated without their input into research. People with intellectual disabilities can make valuable contributions to the evidence base.

在使用解释性现象学分析的研究中纳入智力残疾成人的成功策略。
背景:智力残疾的成年人不常被要求参加健康研究。这可能是因为研究人员认为,无论有没有重要的支持,他们都无法有意义地参与研究,而且由于同意和精神能力等问题,他们预计很难获得伦理批准。这意味着,在健康研究中往往忽略了智力残疾成年人的声音,他们的经历和观点也未得到探索。目的:分享从一项使用解释现象学分析(IPA)的研究中有目的的成人智力残疾样本中获取、招募和收集数据的成功策略。讨论:IPA是一种以人为本、灵活和创造性的研究方法。与智障人士、他们的家人、照顾者、倡导团体经理、智障服务专家和研究主管进行有意义的合作,对研究的成功至关重要。这组作者分享了包括智障人士在内的实用策略,这是从一个对智障领域不熟悉的新手研究者的角度出发的。结论:将智力障碍者纳入卫生保健研究中具有重要意义。本文提出了一个框架,以支持智力残疾专业领域以外的研究人员实现这一目标。对实践的影响:如果卫生服务要满足个人需要,个人对卫生保健的看法和看法很重要。智力残疾的成年人往往得不到良好的医疗保健,结果也较差。如果没有他们对研究的投入,这种情况将会持续下去。智障人士可以为证据基础作出宝贵的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信