The efficiency of distress thermometer in the determination of supporting needs for cancer inpatients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abdullah Al-Shaaobi, Murad Alahdal, Shiying Yu, Hongming Pan
{"title":"The efficiency of distress thermometer in the determination of supporting needs for cancer inpatients.","authors":"Abdullah Al-Shaaobi,&nbsp;Murad Alahdal,&nbsp;Shiying Yu,&nbsp;Hongming Pan","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2021.1957199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological distress scale is highly recommended for cancer patients' care. Several psychological scales have been implemented in cancer outpatient clinics. However, the use of the psychological distress scale, particularly distress thermometer (DT), in the inpatient has not been reported. In this study, we report the efficacy of DT in the determination of cancer inpatients' supporting needs.A total of 170 inpatients diagnosed with cancer have been enrolled in this study. Only 132 patients matched the inclusion criteria, while other cases were excluded because of other diseases associated with cancer. The standardized problem list (PL) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were implemented in comparison with DT. Then, the cut-off score of DT was performed to identify clinically significant differences.The analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that a DT cut-off score of 4 displayed 0.76 under the ROC curve. Sensitivity showed 0.86 sensitivity for cut-off score 4 and a specificity of 0.56 relative to the HADS cut-off score (≥15). DT scores were found independent of medical variables such as cancer type and stage, recurrence, or metastasis. Clinical ECOG-SP showed a significant association with the DT cut-off score (P ≤ 0.05). Regarding PL, patients with scores above DT cut-off were suffering 21 of 40 problems in all categories. Furthermore, patients that scored above the DT cut-off significantly showed an association with high support needs.DT scale showed significant performance in the evaluation of psychological distress among cancer inpatients through the efficient determination of their support needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49910,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"1957199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/e1/ZLJM_16_1957199.PMC8344234.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2021.1957199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Psychological distress scale is highly recommended for cancer patients' care. Several psychological scales have been implemented in cancer outpatient clinics. However, the use of the psychological distress scale, particularly distress thermometer (DT), in the inpatient has not been reported. In this study, we report the efficacy of DT in the determination of cancer inpatients' supporting needs.A total of 170 inpatients diagnosed with cancer have been enrolled in this study. Only 132 patients matched the inclusion criteria, while other cases were excluded because of other diseases associated with cancer. The standardized problem list (PL) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were implemented in comparison with DT. Then, the cut-off score of DT was performed to identify clinically significant differences.The analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that a DT cut-off score of 4 displayed 0.76 under the ROC curve. Sensitivity showed 0.86 sensitivity for cut-off score 4 and a specificity of 0.56 relative to the HADS cut-off score (≥15). DT scores were found independent of medical variables such as cancer type and stage, recurrence, or metastasis. Clinical ECOG-SP showed a significant association with the DT cut-off score (P ≤ 0.05). Regarding PL, patients with scores above DT cut-off were suffering 21 of 40 problems in all categories. Furthermore, patients that scored above the DT cut-off significantly showed an association with high support needs.DT scale showed significant performance in the evaluation of psychological distress among cancer inpatients through the efficient determination of their support needs.

苦恼温度计测定癌症住院病人支持需求的有效性。
心理困扰量表强烈推荐用于癌症患者的护理。在癌症门诊实施了几种心理量表。然而,在住院患者中使用心理困扰量表,特别是困扰温度计(DT)尚未见报道。在本研究中,我们报告了DT在确定癌症住院患者支持需求方面的有效性。共有170名被诊断为癌症的住院患者参加了这项研究。只有132例患者符合纳入标准,而其他病例因其他与癌症相关的疾病而被排除在外。采用标准化问题表(PL)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)与DT进行比较。然后,进行DT的截止评分,以确定临床显著性差异。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,DT截止评分为4,在ROC曲线下显示为0.76。敏感度为0.86,相对于HADS评分(≥15)敏感度为0.56。DT评分与癌症类型、分期、复发或转移等医学变量无关。临床ECOG-SP与DT截止评分有显著相关性(P≤0.05)。在PL方面,评分高于DT截止值的患者在所有类别的40个问题中有21个问题。此外,得分高于DT临界值的患者显著显示出与高支持需求的关联。DT量表通过有效地确定癌症住院患者的支持需求,在评估癌症住院患者的心理困扰方面表现出显著的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Libyan Journal of Medicine
Libyan Journal of Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Libyan Journal of Medicine (LJM) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access, international medical journal aiming to promote heath and health education by publishing high-quality medical research in the different disciplines of medicine. LJM was founded in 2006 by a group of enthusiastic Libyan medical scientists who looked at the contribution of Libyan publications to the international medical literature and saw that a publication outlet was missing. To fill this gap they launched LJM as a tool for transferring current medical knowledge to and from colleagues in developing countries, particularly African countries, as well as internationally.The journal is still led by a group of Libyan physicians inside and outside Libya, but it also enjoys support and recognition from the international medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信