Wanna grab some dinner? Social relations between helping professionals and members of community mental health or other human service organizations.

Jonathan D Prince, Olivia Mora-Lett, Marina Lalayants, Adam Brown
{"title":"Wanna grab some dinner? Social relations between helping professionals and members of community mental health or other human service organizations.","authors":"Jonathan D Prince,&nbsp;Olivia Mora-Lett,&nbsp;Marina Lalayants,&nbsp;Adam Brown","doi":"10.1037/ort0000552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Could practitioners and members (consumers) of mental health or other organizations interact socially by regularly going out for drinks or dinner together, for example? The American Psychological Association explicitly states for example, \"your psychologist shouldn't also be your friend.\" However such social interactions have occurred for decades in certain clubhouse-modeled community mental healthcare, and maybe research and a more balanced perspective is warranted.</p><p><strong>Design/method: </strong>We interviewed six clubhouse staff that interact socially with members and held three focus groups with 20 members.</p><p><strong>Results/conclusions: </strong>In relation to what we call a social interaction policy, we herein highlight: (a) four policy dimensions (e.g. activity types; relationship closeness); (b) a spectrum of policy challenges (e.g., dealing with romantic overture; feelings of exclusion or hurt and effects on mental health; symptom flare-up while out socializing; financial constraints of members such as dinner costs on limited incomes); and (c) a wide variety of policy benefits such as: (a) learning opportunities for members who can process with staff the ups and downs of social relationships; (b) social skill and network development; (c) enhanced assessment across different times/settings; (d) addressing stigma among staff who must grapple with internal resistance to spend free time with members; (e) enrichment of staff social life; (f) reducing internalized stigma among members when staff value them more holistically; and (g) empowerment of members when staff freely (and optionally) offer a valuable resource (spare time). We offer suggestions for certain types of agencies that may wish to implement social interaction policies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":409666,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"545-557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Could practitioners and members (consumers) of mental health or other organizations interact socially by regularly going out for drinks or dinner together, for example? The American Psychological Association explicitly states for example, "your psychologist shouldn't also be your friend." However such social interactions have occurred for decades in certain clubhouse-modeled community mental healthcare, and maybe research and a more balanced perspective is warranted.

Design/method: We interviewed six clubhouse staff that interact socially with members and held three focus groups with 20 members.

Results/conclusions: In relation to what we call a social interaction policy, we herein highlight: (a) four policy dimensions (e.g. activity types; relationship closeness); (b) a spectrum of policy challenges (e.g., dealing with romantic overture; feelings of exclusion or hurt and effects on mental health; symptom flare-up while out socializing; financial constraints of members such as dinner costs on limited incomes); and (c) a wide variety of policy benefits such as: (a) learning opportunities for members who can process with staff the ups and downs of social relationships; (b) social skill and network development; (c) enhanced assessment across different times/settings; (d) addressing stigma among staff who must grapple with internal resistance to spend free time with members; (e) enrichment of staff social life; (f) reducing internalized stigma among members when staff value them more holistically; and (g) empowerment of members when staff freely (and optionally) offer a valuable resource (spare time). We offer suggestions for certain types of agencies that may wish to implement social interaction policies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

想一起吃晚饭吗?帮助专业人员与社区精神卫生或其他人类服务组织成员之间的社会关系。
目的:心理健康或其他组织的从业者和成员(消费者)是否可以通过定期一起出去喝酒或共进晚餐等方式进行社交互动?例如,美国心理协会明确指出,“你的心理医生不应该同时也是你的朋友。”然而,这种社会互动在某些俱乐部模式的社区精神保健中已经发生了几十年,也许研究和更平衡的观点是有必要的。设计/方法:我们采访了六名与会员进行社交互动的俱乐部工作人员,并举行了三个20名成员的焦点小组。结果/结论:关于我们所谓的社会互动政策,我们在此强调:(a)四个政策维度(例如活动类型;亲密的关系);(b)一系列的政策挑战(例如,处理浪漫的提议;被排斥或受到伤害的感觉及其对精神健康的影响;外出社交时突发的症状;成员的财政拮据(如有限收入的晚餐费用);以及(c)各种各样的政策福利,例如:(a)为会员提供学习机会,使他们能够与员工一起处理社会关系的起起落落;(b)社交技能和网络发展;(c)在不同时间/环境下加强评估;(d)消除工作人员的污名,因为他们必须克服内部阻力,不愿与成员共度空闲时间;(e)丰富工作人员的社交生活;(f)当工作人员更全面地重视成员时,减少成员的内化耻辱;(g)当员工自由地(有选择地)提供宝贵的资源(业余时间)时,赋予成员权力。我们为可能希望实施社会互动政策的某些类型的机构提供建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信