Frontal Sinus "Hump": An Anatomical Risk Factor for Anterior Skull Base Injury in the Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Approach (Outside-In Frontal Drill-Out).

IF 0.4 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Case Reports in Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2021-07-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/3402496
Teppei Takeda, Kazuhiro Omura, Haw Torng, Teru Ebihara, Satoshi Aoki, Kosuke Tochigi, Hiromi Kojima, Nobuyoshi Otori
{"title":"Frontal Sinus \"Hump\": An Anatomical Risk Factor for Anterior Skull Base Injury in the Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Approach (Outside-In Frontal Drill-Out).","authors":"Teppei Takeda,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Omura,&nbsp;Haw Torng,&nbsp;Teru Ebihara,&nbsp;Satoshi Aoki,&nbsp;Kosuke Tochigi,&nbsp;Hiromi Kojima,&nbsp;Nobuyoshi Otori","doi":"10.1155/2021/3402496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skull base injuries caused by the outside-in frontal drill-out technique have not been reported. In this report, we chose an outside-in approach to open the frontal sinus for olfactory neuroblastoma resection. Although we identified the first olfactory fibre, the anterior skull base was damaged while drilling into the frontal sinus on the tumour side. We reconstructed the skull base in multiple layers using fascia and cartilage. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage or intracranial haemorrhage was not observed. In this case, a morphological difference existed in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus between the right and left sides, like a \"hump\" in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus. This case of damage to the anterior skull base that could not be avoided by identifying the first olfactory fibre alone is the first published case of skull base injury caused by the outside-in approach due to morphological variations of the frontal sinus and skull base. In this approach, the posterior wall of the frontal sinus cannot be observed because the intraoperative landmark is limited to the first olfactory fibre. Therefore, morphological variations of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus should be analysed in advance to prevent cranial base injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":45872,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Otolaryngology","volume":"2021 ","pages":"3402496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3402496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skull base injuries caused by the outside-in frontal drill-out technique have not been reported. In this report, we chose an outside-in approach to open the frontal sinus for olfactory neuroblastoma resection. Although we identified the first olfactory fibre, the anterior skull base was damaged while drilling into the frontal sinus on the tumour side. We reconstructed the skull base in multiple layers using fascia and cartilage. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage or intracranial haemorrhage was not observed. In this case, a morphological difference existed in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus between the right and left sides, like a "hump" in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus. This case of damage to the anterior skull base that could not be avoided by identifying the first olfactory fibre alone is the first published case of skull base injury caused by the outside-in approach due to morphological variations of the frontal sinus and skull base. In this approach, the posterior wall of the frontal sinus cannot be observed because the intraoperative landmark is limited to the first olfactory fibre. Therefore, morphological variations of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus should be analysed in advance to prevent cranial base injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

额窦“驼峰”:内镜下改良Lothrop入路(由外向内额部钻出)前颅底损伤的解剖学危险因素。
由外向内额部钻孔技术造成颅底损伤尚未见报道。在本报告中,我们选择了一种由外而内的方法来打开额窦进行嗅神经母细胞瘤切除术。虽然我们发现了第一嗅纤维,但在肿瘤一侧的额窦钻孔时,前颅底受损。我们利用筋膜和软骨重建了多层颅底。术后未见脑脊液漏或颅内出血。在本例中,左右两侧额窦后壁存在形态差异,如额窦后壁出现“驼峰”。本例前颅底损伤不能通过单独识别第一嗅纤维来避免,这是第一例因额窦和颅底形态变化而由外向内入路引起颅底损伤的病例。在这种入路中,由于术中标记仅限于第一嗅纤维,因此无法观察到额窦后壁。因此,应提前分析额窦后壁的形态学变化,防止颅底损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Otolaryngology
Case Reports in Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信