Ketamine Sub-Dissociative Dose Vs. Morphine Sulfate for Acute Pain Control in Patients with Isolated Limb Injuries in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial.

Hooman Esfahani, Zahra Khazaeipour, Arash Safaie, Seyed Mojtaba Aghili
{"title":"Ketamine Sub-Dissociative Dose Vs. Morphine Sulfate for Acute Pain Control in Patients with Isolated Limb Injuries in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hooman Esfahani,&nbsp;Zahra Khazaeipour,&nbsp;Arash Safaie,&nbsp;Seyed Mojtaba Aghili","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.85949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the ketamine efficacy at a sub-dissociative morphine dose to reduce pain in isolated limb traumatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind randomized clinical trial study was carried out on patients referred to emergency departments (EDs) due to isolated limb traumatic injuries. Eligible patients were divided into two groups which one group received 0.1 mg/kg ketamine and the other group received 0.05 mg/kg morphine, intravenously. An observed side effect includes pain scores and vital signs were recorded at baseline of every 5 minutes for 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 73 patients with the mean age of 32.9±10.4 were enrolled of whom 59 (80.8%) individuals were men. The baseline characteristics difference of the two study groups was not statistically significant. The results showed that the change of mean pain score was -6.2 (95% CI: -5.72 to -6.69) points in the group receiving ketamine compared to -5.8 (95%CI: -5.15 to - 6.48) in the group who were administered morphine. At all assessed checkpoints, the pain mean score was lower in the ketamine group than in the morphine group (<i>p</i><0.05); the mean of total pain reduction was greater in the ketamine group during the observation period compared with patients who received morphine (<i>p</i>=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings suggest that the sub-dissociative ketamine efficacy in controlling of the acute pain is not lower than morphine sulfate in patients with isolated limb trauma in ED's. Thus, it can be considered as a safe and effective alternative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"9 2","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195828/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.85949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To compare the ketamine efficacy at a sub-dissociative morphine dose to reduce pain in isolated limb traumatic injuries.

Methods: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study was carried out on patients referred to emergency departments (EDs) due to isolated limb traumatic injuries. Eligible patients were divided into two groups which one group received 0.1 mg/kg ketamine and the other group received 0.05 mg/kg morphine, intravenously. An observed side effect includes pain scores and vital signs were recorded at baseline of every 5 minutes for 30 minutes.

Results: Totally, 73 patients with the mean age of 32.9±10.4 were enrolled of whom 59 (80.8%) individuals were men. The baseline characteristics difference of the two study groups was not statistically significant. The results showed that the change of mean pain score was -6.2 (95% CI: -5.72 to -6.69) points in the group receiving ketamine compared to -5.8 (95%CI: -5.15 to - 6.48) in the group who were administered morphine. At all assessed checkpoints, the pain mean score was lower in the ketamine group than in the morphine group (p<0.05); the mean of total pain reduction was greater in the ketamine group during the observation period compared with patients who received morphine (p=0.002).

Conclusion: The study findings suggest that the sub-dissociative ketamine efficacy in controlling of the acute pain is not lower than morphine sulfate in patients with isolated limb trauma in ED's. Thus, it can be considered as a safe and effective alternative approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氯胺酮亚解离剂量与硫酸吗啡对急诊科孤立肢体损伤患者急性疼痛的控制:一项随机、双盲临床试验
目的:比较亚分离吗啡剂量氯胺酮减轻离体肢体创伤疼痛的疗效。方法:采用双盲随机临床试验方法,对因孤立肢体创伤而转诊至急诊科的患者进行研究。将符合条件的患者分为两组,一组静脉注射0.1 mg/kg氯胺酮,另一组静脉注射0.05 mg/kg吗啡。观察到的副作用包括疼痛评分和生命体征,每5分钟记录一次,持续30分钟。结果:共纳入73例患者,平均年龄(32.9±10.4)岁,其中男性59例(80.8%)。两个研究组的基线特征差异无统计学意义。结果显示,氯胺酮组的平均疼痛评分变化为-6.2分(95%CI: -5.72 ~ -6.69),吗啡组为-5.8分(95%CI: -5.15 ~ - 6.48)。在所有评估的检查点,氯胺酮组的疼痛平均评分低于吗啡组(pp=0.002)。结论:亚解离氯胺酮对ED孤立肢体创伤患者急性疼痛的控制效果不低于硫酸吗啡。因此,它可以被认为是一种安全有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信