The Possible Factors Correlated with The Higher Risk of Getting Infected by COVID-19 in Emergency Medical Technicians; A Case-Control Study.

Mostafa Sadeghi, Peyman Saberian, Parisa Hasani-Sharamin, Fatemeh Dadashi, Sepideh Babaniamansour, Ehsan Aliniagerdroudbari
{"title":"The Possible Factors Correlated with The Higher Risk of Getting Infected by COVID-19 in Emergency Medical Technicians; A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Mostafa Sadeghi,&nbsp;Peyman Saberian,&nbsp;Parisa Hasani-Sharamin,&nbsp;Fatemeh Dadashi,&nbsp;Sepideh Babaniamansour,&nbsp;Ehsan Aliniagerdroudbari","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.89713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the possible factors associated with increasing risk of COVID-19 among EMTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a case-control study conducted in Tehran, Iran. Case group was consisted of confirmed COVID-19 EMTs based on the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and/or lung computed tomography scan. Healthy EMTs were randomly selected as control group. Patients were asked to fill out a checklist including demographic data, data related to the work situation (such as number of missions and type of mask and cloth) and PPE precautions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients and 148 healthy persons took part in this study as case and control group, respectively. Having two EMTs involved directly in taking care of patients (<i>p</i><0.001) and working with a confirmed case teammate (<i>p</i><0.001), considering the precautions such as seal check after wearing the mask (<i>p</i>=0.015), covering the hair with a medical hat (<i>p</i><0.001), not using personal items despite protective clothing (<i>p</i><0.001), and avoiding contact with the outer surface of clothing while removing (<i>p</i><0.001) had significant difference in two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the type and method of use of PPE were correlated with the increasing risk of COVID-19 in EMTs. Also, we found that when two EMTs were involved directly in taking care of the patients, and those who worked with a confirmed case teammate, more frequently affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195834/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.89713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: To assess the possible factors associated with increasing risk of COVID-19 among EMTs.

Methods: This study was a case-control study conducted in Tehran, Iran. Case group was consisted of confirmed COVID-19 EMTs based on the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and/or lung computed tomography scan. Healthy EMTs were randomly selected as control group. Patients were asked to fill out a checklist including demographic data, data related to the work situation (such as number of missions and type of mask and cloth) and PPE precautions.

Results: Sixty-eight patients and 148 healthy persons took part in this study as case and control group, respectively. Having two EMTs involved directly in taking care of patients (p<0.001) and working with a confirmed case teammate (p<0.001), considering the precautions such as seal check after wearing the mask (p=0.015), covering the hair with a medical hat (p<0.001), not using personal items despite protective clothing (p<0.001), and avoiding contact with the outer surface of clothing while removing (p<0.001) had significant difference in two groups.

Conclusion: We found that the type and method of use of PPE were correlated with the increasing risk of COVID-19 in EMTs. Also, we found that when two EMTs were involved directly in taking care of the patients, and those who worked with a confirmed case teammate, more frequently affected.

急诊医务人员新型冠状病毒感染高危因素分析病例对照研究。
目的:探讨急诊医务人员感染新冠肺炎风险增加的可能因素。方法:本研究是在伊朗德黑兰进行的病例对照研究。病例组由根据逆转录酶聚合酶链反应和/或肺部计算机断层扫描结果确诊的COVID-19 emt组成。随机选取健康急救人员作为对照组。患者被要求填写一份清单,包括人口统计数据、与工作情况相关的数据(如任务数量、口罩和布的类型)以及个人防护装备预防措施。结果:68例患者和148名健康人分别作为病例组和对照组。两名医务人员直接参与护理患者(ppp=0.015),用医疗帽遮盖头发(ppp)。结论:医务人员使用PPE的类型和方法与COVID-19风险增加相关。此外,我们发现,当两名急诊医生直接参与照顾病人时,以及那些与确诊病例队友一起工作的人,更容易受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信