Possible novel features of synaptic regulation during long-term facilitation in Aplysia.

IF 2.2
Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2021-06-15 Print Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053124.120
Iksung Jin, Stefan Kassabov, Eric R Kandel, Robert D Hawkins
{"title":"Possible novel features of synaptic regulation during long-term facilitation in <i>Aplysia</i>.","authors":"Iksung Jin,&nbsp;Stefan Kassabov,&nbsp;Eric R Kandel,&nbsp;Robert D Hawkins","doi":"10.1101/lm.053124.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most studies of molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity have focused on the sequence of changes either at individual synapses or in the cell nucleus. However, studies of long-term facilitation at <i>Aplysia</i> sensory neuron-motor neuron synapses in isolated cell culture suggest two additional features of facilitation. First, that there is also regulation of the number of synaptic contacts between two neurons, which may occur at the level of cell pair-specific branch points in the neuronal arbor. Branch points contain many molecules that are involved in protein synthesis-dependent long-term facilitation including neurotrophins and the RNA binding protein CPEB. Second, the regulation involves homeostatic feedback and tends to keep the total number of contacts between two neurons at a fairly constant level both at rest and following facilitation. That raises the question of how facilitation and homeostasis can coexist. A possible answer is suggested by the findings that they both involve spontaneous transmission and postsynaptic Ca<sup>2+</sup>, which can have bidirectional effects similar to LTP and LTD in hippocampus. In addition, long-term facilitation can involve a change in the set point of homeostasis, which could be encoded by plasticity molecules such as CPEB and/or PKM. A computational model based on these ideas can qualitatively simulate the basic features of both facilitation and homeostasis of the number of contacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520703,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"218-227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/6f/LM053124Jin.PMC8212780.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053124.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Most studies of molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity have focused on the sequence of changes either at individual synapses or in the cell nucleus. However, studies of long-term facilitation at Aplysia sensory neuron-motor neuron synapses in isolated cell culture suggest two additional features of facilitation. First, that there is also regulation of the number of synaptic contacts between two neurons, which may occur at the level of cell pair-specific branch points in the neuronal arbor. Branch points contain many molecules that are involved in protein synthesis-dependent long-term facilitation including neurotrophins and the RNA binding protein CPEB. Second, the regulation involves homeostatic feedback and tends to keep the total number of contacts between two neurons at a fairly constant level both at rest and following facilitation. That raises the question of how facilitation and homeostasis can coexist. A possible answer is suggested by the findings that they both involve spontaneous transmission and postsynaptic Ca2+, which can have bidirectional effects similar to LTP and LTD in hippocampus. In addition, long-term facilitation can involve a change in the set point of homeostasis, which could be encoded by plasticity molecules such as CPEB and/or PKM. A computational model based on these ideas can qualitatively simulate the basic features of both facilitation and homeostasis of the number of contacts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

长期易化过程中突触调节可能的新特征。
大多数突触可塑性分子机制的研究都集中在单个突触或细胞核的变化序列上。然而,在分离的细胞培养中,对海兔感觉神经元-运动神经元突触的长期易化的研究表明,易化有两个额外的特征。首先,两个神经元之间的突触接触数量也有调控,这可能发生在神经元乔木中细胞对特异性分支点的水平上。分支点包含许多参与蛋白质合成依赖的长期促进的分子,包括神经营养因子和RNA结合蛋白CPEB。其次,这种调节涉及稳态反馈,并倾向于使两个神经元之间的接触总数保持在一个相当恒定的水平,无论是在静止状态还是在易化状态下。这就提出了促进和体内平衡如何共存的问题。研究结果提出了一个可能的答案,即它们都涉及自发传递和突触后Ca2+,这可能具有类似于海马体中的LTP和LTD的双向作用。此外,长期促进可能涉及到体内平衡设定点的改变,这可能是由CPEB和/或PKM等可塑性分子编码的。基于这些思想的计算模型可以定性地模拟接触数量的促进和动态平衡的基本特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信