Social Features of Integration in Health Systems and Their Relationship to Provider Experience, Care Quality and Clinical Integration.

Medical care research and review : MCRR Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-16 DOI:10.1177/10775587211024796
Michaela Kerrissey, Maike Tietschert, Zhanna Novikov, Hassina Bahadurzada, Anna D Sinaiko, Veronique Martin, Sara J Singer
{"title":"Social Features of Integration in Health Systems and Their Relationship to Provider Experience, Care Quality and Clinical Integration.","authors":"Michaela Kerrissey,&nbsp;Maike Tietschert,&nbsp;Zhanna Novikov,&nbsp;Hassina Bahadurzada,&nbsp;Anna D Sinaiko,&nbsp;Veronique Martin,&nbsp;Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1177/10775587211024796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More is known about the structural features of health system integration than the social features-elements of normative integration (alignment of norms) and interpersonal integration (collaboration among professionals and with patients). We surveyed practice managers and 1,360 staff and physicians at 59 practice sites within 17 health systems (828 responses; 61%). Building on prior theory, we developed and established the psychometric properties of survey measures describing normative and interpersonal integration. Normative and interpersonal integration were both consistently related to better provider experience, perceived care quality, and clinical integration (e.g., a 1-point increase in a practice's normative integration was associated with 0.53-point higher job satisfaction and 0.77-point higher perceived care quality in the practice, measured on 1 to 5 scales, <i>p</i> < .01). Variation in social features of integration may help explain why some health systems better integrate care, pointing to normative and interpersonal integration as potential resources for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":" ","pages":"359-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10775587211024796","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587211024796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

More is known about the structural features of health system integration than the social features-elements of normative integration (alignment of norms) and interpersonal integration (collaboration among professionals and with patients). We surveyed practice managers and 1,360 staff and physicians at 59 practice sites within 17 health systems (828 responses; 61%). Building on prior theory, we developed and established the psychometric properties of survey measures describing normative and interpersonal integration. Normative and interpersonal integration were both consistently related to better provider experience, perceived care quality, and clinical integration (e.g., a 1-point increase in a practice's normative integration was associated with 0.53-point higher job satisfaction and 0.77-point higher perceived care quality in the practice, measured on 1 to 5 scales, p < .01). Variation in social features of integration may help explain why some health systems better integrate care, pointing to normative and interpersonal integration as potential resources for improvement.

卫生系统整合的社会特征及其与提供者经验、护理质量和临床整合的关系。
对卫生系统整合的结构特征的了解多于对社会特征的了解,即规范整合(规范的一致性)和人际整合(专业人员之间和与患者之间的合作)的要素。我们调查了17个卫生系统内59个实践点的实践管理人员和1,360名工作人员和医生(828份答复;61%)。在先前理论的基础上,我们发展并建立了描述规范和人际整合的调查措施的心理测量特性。规范整合和人际整合都与更好的提供者体验、感知护理质量和临床整合相关(例如,在1到5量表上,规范整合每增加1分,工作满意度就会提高0.53分,感知护理质量就会提高0.77分,p < 0.01)。整合的社会特征的差异可能有助于解释为什么一些卫生系统更好地整合护理,指出规范和人际整合是改进的潜在资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信