A Protocol to Systematic Radiographic Assessment of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-07-17 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S320372
Ahmed A Khalifa, Arun B Mullaji, Alaa M Mostafa, Osama A Farouk
{"title":"A Protocol to Systematic Radiographic Assessment of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Ahmed A Khalifa,&nbsp;Arun B Mullaji,&nbsp;Alaa M Mostafa,&nbsp;Osama A Farouk","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S320372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered one of the most successful procedures, however, a subset of patients are unsatisfied with the results, even with the introduction of new technologies and implant designs. Radiological assessment of TKA is still considered the most prevalent imaging modality for evaluating the knee joint pre-and postoperatively. Assessment of various angles and indices which could be measured in different radiographic views of the knee provides valuable information about the alignment of the entire limb and the individual prosthetic components, more so in the light of recent nuanced concepts of technique, alignment, and balance. This review article aims to present a comprehensive yet systematic approach to the most useful radiographic parameters for assessing the knee preoperatively and post-TKA by explaining the tools and techniques used for measuring various angles, indices and ratios in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes for diagnosis, preoperative planning, postoperative assessment, and routine follow-up. The protocol we followed in this review entailed first reporting the possible applications and software which could help in measuring these variables, then we mentioned the required series of knee radiographs. For the desired variables, we divided the assessment according to each plane, and in each, we reported the optimum position of the desired radiographic view followed by determining the axis and lines which will later form the desired angles to be measured; finally, we collected all the measurements in a table with the native knee values and the most accepted values after TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"95-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/37/orr-13-95.PMC8294812.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S320372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered one of the most successful procedures, however, a subset of patients are unsatisfied with the results, even with the introduction of new technologies and implant designs. Radiological assessment of TKA is still considered the most prevalent imaging modality for evaluating the knee joint pre-and postoperatively. Assessment of various angles and indices which could be measured in different radiographic views of the knee provides valuable information about the alignment of the entire limb and the individual prosthetic components, more so in the light of recent nuanced concepts of technique, alignment, and balance. This review article aims to present a comprehensive yet systematic approach to the most useful radiographic parameters for assessing the knee preoperatively and post-TKA by explaining the tools and techniques used for measuring various angles, indices and ratios in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes for diagnosis, preoperative planning, postoperative assessment, and routine follow-up. The protocol we followed in this review entailed first reporting the possible applications and software which could help in measuring these variables, then we mentioned the required series of knee radiographs. For the desired variables, we divided the assessment according to each plane, and in each, we reported the optimum position of the desired radiographic view followed by determining the axis and lines which will later form the desired angles to be measured; finally, we collected all the measurements in a table with the native knee values and the most accepted values after TKA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发性全膝关节置换术的系统影像学评估方案。
尽管全膝关节置换术(TKA)被认为是最成功的手术之一,然而,即使引入了新技术和植入物设计,仍有一部分患者对结果不满意。TKA的放射学评估仍然被认为是评估膝关节术前和术后最流行的影像学方式。不同角度和指标的评估可以在不同的膝关节x线片上测量,这为整个肢体和单个假体部件的对齐提供了有价值的信息,更重要的是考虑到最近技术、对齐和平衡的微妙概念。这篇综述文章旨在通过解释用于测量冠状面、矢状面和轴向面各种角度、指数和比例的工具和技术,为诊断、术前计划、术后评估和常规随访提供一种全面而系统的方法,以评估术前和tka后膝关节最有用的放射学参数。我们在本综述中遵循的方案包括首先报告可能的应用和软件,这些软件可以帮助测量这些变量,然后我们提到了所需的一系列膝关节x线片。对于所需的变量,我们根据每个平面进行评估,并在每个平面中报告所需放射视图的最佳位置,然后确定轴和线,这些轴和线将随后形成所需的测量角度;最后,我们将所有测量值收集到一个表格中,其中包括膝关节的原始值和TKA后最被接受的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信