Megan A. Moreno MD, MSEd, MPH , Jens Eickhoff PhD , Qianqian Zhao MS , Henry N. Young PhD , Elizabeth D. Cox PhD
{"title":"Problematic Internet Use: A Longitudinal Study Evaluating Prevalence and Predictors","authors":"Megan A. Moreno MD, MSEd, MPH , Jens Eickhoff PhD , Qianqian Zhao MS , Henry N. Young PhD , Elizabeth D. Cox PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ympdx.2019.100006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the prevalence over time and predictors of problematic internet use using the Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS). We also identified an intermediate-risk PRIUSS score.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>In this longitudinal cohort study, we recruited participants using random selection from 2 colleges. Participants completed a yearly PRIUSS. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate predictors of problematic internet use. We pursued receiver operating curve analysis to identify an Intermediate risk PRIUSS score. Finally, we applied Markov modeling to test the dynamics of moving through problematic internet use risk states over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 319 participants, 56% were female, 58% were from the Midwest, and 75% were white. Problematic internet use prevalence estimates varied between 9% and 11% over the 4 years. Problematic internet use risk status from the previous time period was identified as the main predictor for problematic internet use (OR 24.1, 95% CI 12.8-45.4, <em>P</em> < .0001). Receiver operating curve analysis identified the optimal threshold for defining Intermediate risk was a PRIUSS score of 15.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This longitudinal study of problematic internet use among college students found that risks were present across groups and over time. The most salient predictor of problematic internet use was being at risk at the previous time point. On the basis of these results, we propose a PRIUSS score of 15 as an intermediate-risk cut-off to better identify those at risk of developing problematic internet use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics: X","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ympdx.2019.100006","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590042019300060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Objective
To assess the prevalence over time and predictors of problematic internet use using the Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS). We also identified an intermediate-risk PRIUSS score.
Study design
In this longitudinal cohort study, we recruited participants using random selection from 2 colleges. Participants completed a yearly PRIUSS. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate predictors of problematic internet use. We pursued receiver operating curve analysis to identify an Intermediate risk PRIUSS score. Finally, we applied Markov modeling to test the dynamics of moving through problematic internet use risk states over time.
Results
Of 319 participants, 56% were female, 58% were from the Midwest, and 75% were white. Problematic internet use prevalence estimates varied between 9% and 11% over the 4 years. Problematic internet use risk status from the previous time period was identified as the main predictor for problematic internet use (OR 24.1, 95% CI 12.8-45.4, P < .0001). Receiver operating curve analysis identified the optimal threshold for defining Intermediate risk was a PRIUSS score of 15.
Conclusions
This longitudinal study of problematic internet use among college students found that risks were present across groups and over time. The most salient predictor of problematic internet use was being at risk at the previous time point. On the basis of these results, we propose a PRIUSS score of 15 as an intermediate-risk cut-off to better identify those at risk of developing problematic internet use.
目的利用问题和风险网络使用筛查量表(PRIUSS)评估问题网络使用的流行程度和预测因素。我们还确定了一个中等风险的普锐斯评分。研究设计在这项纵向队列研究中,我们随机从两所大学招募参与者。参与者完成了年度普锐斯。我们使用多元逻辑回归分析来评估有问题的网络使用的预测因素。我们进行了受试者操作曲线分析,以确定中等风险的PRIUSS评分。最后,我们应用马尔可夫模型来测试随着时间的推移,在有问题的互联网使用风险状态中移动的动态。结果在319名参与者中,56%是女性,58%来自中西部,75%是白人。在过去的4年里,有问题的互联网使用率估计在9%到11%之间。前一时期的问题网络使用风险状态被确定为问题网络使用的主要预测因子(OR 24.1, 95% CI 12.8-45.4, P <。)。经受试者工作曲线分析,判定中度风险的最佳阈值为PRIUSS评分15分。这项对大学生上网问题的纵向研究发现,这种风险在不同群体和不同时间都存在。有问题的网络使用最显著的预测指标是在之前的时间点处于危险之中。在这些结果的基础上,我们建议PRIUSS得分为15分作为中间风险临界值,以更好地识别那些有发展成问题互联网使用风险的人。