Random forest approach for determining risk prediction and predictive factors of type 2 diabetes: large-scale health check-up data in Japan.

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2021-03-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000200
Tadao Ooka, Hisashi Johno, Kazunori Nakamoto, Yoshioki Yoda, Hiroshi Yokomichi, Zentaro Yamagata
{"title":"Random forest approach for determining risk prediction and predictive factors of type 2 diabetes: large-scale health check-up data in Japan.","authors":"Tadao Ooka,&nbsp;Hisashi Johno,&nbsp;Kazunori Nakamoto,&nbsp;Yoshioki Yoda,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yokomichi,&nbsp;Zentaro Yamagata","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early intervention in type 2 diabetes can prevent exacerbation of insulin resistance. More effective interventions can be implemented by early and precise prediction of the change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Artificial intelligence (AI), which has been introduced into various medical fields, may be useful in predicting changes in HbA1c. However, the inability to explain the predictive factors has been a problem in the use of deep learning, the leading AI technology. Therefore, we applied a highly interpretable AI method, random forest (RF), to large-scale health check-up data and examined whether there was an advantage over a conventional prediction model.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study included a cumulative total of 42 908 subjects not receiving treatment for diabetes with an HbA1c <6.5%. The objective variable was the change in HbA1c in the next year. Each prediction model was created with 51 health-check items and part of their change values from the previous year. We used two analytical methods to compare the predictive powers: RF as a new model and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) as a conventional model. We also created models excluding the change values to determine whether it positively affected the predictions. In addition, variable importance was calculated in the RF analysis, and standard regression coefficients were calculated in the MLR analysis to identify the predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RF model showed a higher predictive power for the change in HbA1c than MLR in all models. The RF model including change values showed the highest predictive power. In the RF prediction model, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, body weight, alkaline phosphatase and platelet count were factors with high predictive power.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correct use of the RF method may enable highly accurate risk prediction for the change in HbA1c and may allow the identification of new diabetes risk predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":" ","pages":"140-148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000200","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Introduction: Early intervention in type 2 diabetes can prevent exacerbation of insulin resistance. More effective interventions can be implemented by early and precise prediction of the change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Artificial intelligence (AI), which has been introduced into various medical fields, may be useful in predicting changes in HbA1c. However, the inability to explain the predictive factors has been a problem in the use of deep learning, the leading AI technology. Therefore, we applied a highly interpretable AI method, random forest (RF), to large-scale health check-up data and examined whether there was an advantage over a conventional prediction model.

Research design and methods: This study included a cumulative total of 42 908 subjects not receiving treatment for diabetes with an HbA1c <6.5%. The objective variable was the change in HbA1c in the next year. Each prediction model was created with 51 health-check items and part of their change values from the previous year. We used two analytical methods to compare the predictive powers: RF as a new model and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) as a conventional model. We also created models excluding the change values to determine whether it positively affected the predictions. In addition, variable importance was calculated in the RF analysis, and standard regression coefficients were calculated in the MLR analysis to identify the predictors.

Results: The RF model showed a higher predictive power for the change in HbA1c than MLR in all models. The RF model including change values showed the highest predictive power. In the RF prediction model, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, body weight, alkaline phosphatase and platelet count were factors with high predictive power.

Conclusions: Correct use of the RF method may enable highly accurate risk prediction for the change in HbA1c and may allow the identification of new diabetes risk predictors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

确定2型糖尿病风险预测和预测因素的随机森林方法:日本大规模健康检查数据
2型糖尿病的早期干预可以预防胰岛素抵抗的恶化。通过早期准确预测糖化血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)的变化,可以实施更有效的干预措施。人工智能(AI)已被引入各个医学领域,可能有助于预测HbA1c的变化。然而,在使用领先的人工智能技术深度学习时,无法解释预测因素一直是一个问题。因此,我们将一种高度可解释的人工智能方法——随机森林(RF)应用于大规模健康检查数据,并检验其是否优于传统预测模型。研究设计和方法:本研究共纳入42 908名未接受糖尿病治疗的HbA1c患者。结果:RF模型对HbA1c变化的预测能力高于MLR模型。包含变化值的RF模型预测能力最强。在RF预测模型中,HbA1c、空腹血糖、体重、碱性磷酸酶和血小板计数是预测能力较高的因素。结论:正确使用RF方法可以对HbA1c的变化进行高度准确的风险预测,并可以识别新的糖尿病风险预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信