Postpartum care indications and methodological quality:a systematic review of guidelines.

IF 1.6
Ming Yang, Wei Yue, Xinrui Han, Chunhong Hu, Xiaoning Sun, Jianghe Luo
{"title":"Postpartum care indications and methodological quality:a systematic review of guidelines.","authors":"Ming Yang, Wei Yue, Xinrui Han, Chunhong Hu, Xiaoning Sun, Jianghe Luo","doi":"10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coverage of postpartum care is not ideal, and has not been used very well due to not enough attention being paid to the puerperal women and newborns, especially in developing countries. Practice guidelines on postpartum care provide beneficial practice guidance and help to reduce maternal mortality. However, little is known about the credibility and consistency of those guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to summarize main postpartum care indications and appraise methodological quality of guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven literature databases and guideline development institutions and organizations of obstetrics and maternity care were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument, and synthesized consistent and non-consistent recommendations using the content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine guidelines were included and a total of eight postpartum care indications were identified. Most guidelines focused on care indications and interventions including exclusive breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, home visit, infant or newborn care and sexuality, contraception, and birth spacing. However, indications such as pain or weight management, pelvic floor muscle training, abdominal rehabilitation, and mental health got less attention. Additionally, the overall quality of all involving postpartum care guidelines is relatively good and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidelines developed by NICE, RANO, and WHO indicated higher methodological quality. For postpartum care indications, most guidelines are incomplete. Variation in practice guidelines for postpartum care recommendations exists. In the future, implementation research into shared decision-making, as well as further high-quality research to broaden the evidence base for postpartum care indications is recommended.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":520829,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"2261-2275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coverage of postpartum care is not ideal, and has not been used very well due to not enough attention being paid to the puerperal women and newborns, especially in developing countries. Practice guidelines on postpartum care provide beneficial practice guidance and help to reduce maternal mortality. However, little is known about the credibility and consistency of those guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to summarize main postpartum care indications and appraise methodological quality of guidelines.

Methods: Seven literature databases and guideline development institutions and organizations of obstetrics and maternity care were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument, and synthesized consistent and non-consistent recommendations using the content analysis approach.

Results: Twenty-nine guidelines were included and a total of eight postpartum care indications were identified. Most guidelines focused on care indications and interventions including exclusive breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, home visit, infant or newborn care and sexuality, contraception, and birth spacing. However, indications such as pain or weight management, pelvic floor muscle training, abdominal rehabilitation, and mental health got less attention. Additionally, the overall quality of all involving postpartum care guidelines is relatively good and acceptable.

Conclusions: Guidelines developed by NICE, RANO, and WHO indicated higher methodological quality. For postpartum care indications, most guidelines are incomplete. Variation in practice guidelines for postpartum care recommendations exists. In the future, implementation research into shared decision-making, as well as further high-quality research to broaden the evidence base for postpartum care indications is recommended.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

产后护理指征和方法质量:指南的系统回顾。
背景:产后护理的覆盖率并不理想,由于对产褥期妇女和新生儿的重视不够,特别是在发展中国家,产后护理的覆盖率没有得到很好的利用。产后护理实践指南提供了有益的实践指导,有助于降低产妇死亡率。然而,人们对这些准则的可信度和一致性知之甚少。本系统综述总结了主要的产后护理指征,并评价了指南的方法学质量。方法:检索7个妇产科文献数据库及指南制定机构和组织。两位审稿人使用AGREE II工具独立评估指南质量,并使用内容分析方法综合一致和不一致的建议。结果:纳入29项指南,共确定8项产后护理指征。大多数指南侧重于护理指征和干预措施,包括纯母乳喂养、孕产妇营养、家访、婴儿或新生儿护理和性行为、避孕和生育间隔。然而,诸如疼痛或体重管理、骨盆底肌肉训练、腹部康复和心理健康等适应症得到的关注较少。此外,所有涉及产后护理指南的整体质量相对较好,可接受。结论:NICE、RANO和WHO制定的指南表明方法学质量更高。对于产后护理指征,大多数指南是不完整的。产后护理建议的实践指南存在差异。建议今后开展共享决策的实施研究,并进一步开展高质量的研究,拓宽产后护理指征的证据基础。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书