Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ann David, StephenSukumaran ReethaJanetSureka, Sankaralingam Gayathri, Salai Jeyseelan Annamalai, Selvaraj Samuelkamleshkumar, Anju Kuruvilla, Henry Prakash Magimairaj, Skm Varadhan, Sivakumar Balasubramanian
{"title":"Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units.","authors":"Ann David,&nbsp;StephenSukumaran ReethaJanetSureka,&nbsp;Sankaralingam Gayathri,&nbsp;Salai Jeyseelan Annamalai,&nbsp;Selvaraj Samuelkamleshkumar,&nbsp;Anju Kuruvilla,&nbsp;Henry Prakash Magimairaj,&nbsp;Skm Varadhan,&nbsp;Sivakumar Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1177/20556683211019694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50-60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method.<b>Clinical trial registry number:</b> CTRI/2018/09/015648.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211019694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211019694","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use.

Methods: In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use.

Results: From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50-60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively.

Conclusions: The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method.Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用惯性测量装置量化偏瘫患者的相对手臂使用。
简介:基于加速度计的活动计数用于测量手臂的使用,由于非功能性运动,容易被高估。在本文中,我们使用基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的总运动(GM)评分来量化手臂使用。方法:在这项分为两部分的研究中,我们首先通过将其与5名偏瘫患者和10名对照组进行一系列活动的注释视频记录进行比较来表征GM。在第二部分中,我们分别用两个腕戴imu跟踪了5名患者和5名对照组的手臂使用情况,分别为7天和3天。IMU数据用于制定定量测量(总和相对手臂使用)和手臂使用的可视化方法。结果:从表征研究中,我们发现GM检测功能活性的准确率为50-60%,消除非功能活性的准确率为>90%。对手臂使用情况的持续监测显示,对照组和患者的手臂使用分别偏向于优势肢体和较少麻痹的肢体。结论:粗大运动评分在识别功能活动方面特异性较好,但敏感性较低。在家中的研究表明,使用两个imu -watch来监测手臂的相对使用是可行的,并为改进评估方法提供了设计考虑。临床试验注册号:CTRI/2018/09/015648。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信