Comparing the racialization of Central-East European migrants in Japan and the UK.

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-14 DOI:10.1186/s40878-021-00239-z
Špela Drnovšek Zorko, Miloš Debnár
{"title":"Comparing the racialization of Central-East European migrants in Japan and the UK.","authors":"Špela Drnovšek Zorko,&nbsp;Miloš Debnár","doi":"10.1186/s40878-021-00239-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article deploys the lens of the race-migration nexus (Erel et al., Ethnic and Racial Studies 39:1339-1360, 2016) to compare the racialization of migrants in the UK and Japan. It draws on qualitative data on the experiences of Central-East European (CEE) migrants in the two countries to unpack how whiteness is constructed in relation to different histories and patterns of immigration in each national context. While CEE migrants in Japan benefit from being perceived as implicitly white and Western 'foreigners', their whiteness represents a form of enduring exclusion from the ethno-nationalist Japanese society. In the UK, changing political contexts and internal European hierarchies of whiteness contribute to CEE migrants' ambiguous position in an increasingly anti-migrant society. By comparing the mechanisms of racialization in each country through the analytics of visibility and exclusion, the article furthers ongoing debates about the intersections of race and migration. It furthermore extends the comparative analysis of whiteness to a non-Western setting, making a significant contribution to the study of local/global articulations of race.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":" ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40878-021-00239-z","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00239-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The article deploys the lens of the race-migration nexus (Erel et al., Ethnic and Racial Studies 39:1339-1360, 2016) to compare the racialization of migrants in the UK and Japan. It draws on qualitative data on the experiences of Central-East European (CEE) migrants in the two countries to unpack how whiteness is constructed in relation to different histories and patterns of immigration in each national context. While CEE migrants in Japan benefit from being perceived as implicitly white and Western 'foreigners', their whiteness represents a form of enduring exclusion from the ethno-nationalist Japanese society. In the UK, changing political contexts and internal European hierarchies of whiteness contribute to CEE migrants' ambiguous position in an increasingly anti-migrant society. By comparing the mechanisms of racialization in each country through the analytics of visibility and exclusion, the article furthers ongoing debates about the intersections of race and migration. It furthermore extends the comparative analysis of whiteness to a non-Western setting, making a significant contribution to the study of local/global articulations of race.

比较在日本和英国的中东欧移民的种族化。
本文运用种族-移民关系的视角(Erel等人,《民族和种族研究》39:1339-1360,2016)来比较英国和日本移民的种族化。它借鉴了两国中东欧移民经历的定性数据,揭示了在每个国家背景下,白人是如何与不同的移民历史和模式相关联的。虽然在日本的中东欧移民受益于被视为含蓄的白人和西方“外国人”,但他们的白人身份代表着一种被长期排斥在民族主义的日本社会之外的形式。在英国,不断变化的政治背景和欧洲内部的白人等级制度,导致中东欧移民在日益反移民的社会中处于模棱两可的地位。通过分析可见性和排斥性来比较每个国家的种族化机制,本文进一步推动了关于种族和移民交叉点的持续辩论。它进一步将白人的比较分析扩展到非西方环境,为研究当地/全球种族关系做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信