Systematic Review of Psychosocial Smoking Cessation Interventions for People with Serious Mental Illness.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2021.1944712
Mark R Hawes, Kimberly B Roth, Leopoldo J Cabassa
{"title":"Systematic Review of Psychosocial Smoking Cessation Interventions for People with Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Mark R Hawes,&nbsp;Kimberly B Roth,&nbsp;Leopoldo J Cabassa","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1944712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tobacco smoking is a major driver of premature mortality in people with serious mental illness (SMI; e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). This systematic literature review described randomized control trials of psychosocial smoking cessation interventions for people with SMI, rated their methodological rigor, evaluated the inclusion of racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities, and examined smoking cessation outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Eligible studies included peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2020 that examined psychosocial smoking cessation interventions in people with SMI. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines to conduct our review and the Methodological Quality Rating Scale to evaluate methodological rigor. <b>Results:</b> Eighteen studies were included. Ten were categorized as high methodological rigor given their study characteristics (e.g., longer follow-up) and eight as lower methodological rigor based on their characteristics (e.g., not intent-to-treat). Racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities were under-represented in these studies. A range of psychosocial interventions were examined including motivational enhancements, smoking cessation education, cognitive behavioral strategies, and contingency management. Most studies also provided smoking cessation medications (e.g., NRT, bupropion), although provision was not always uniform across treatment conditions. Three studies found the intervention condition achieved significantly higher abstinence from smoking compared to the comparison group. Seven studies found the intervention condition achieved significantly higher reductions in smoking compared to the comparison group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Studies finding significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups shared common evidenced-based components, including providing smoking cessation medications (e.g., NRT, bupropion), motivational enhancement techniques, and cessation education and skills training, but differed in intensity (e.g., number and frequency of sessions), duration, and modality (e.g., group, individual, technology). Methodological limitations and a small number of studies finding significant between-group differences prevent the identification of the most effective psychosocial smoking cessation interventions. Clinical trial designs (e.g., SMART, factorial) that control for the provision of psychosocial medications and allow for the identification of optimal psychosocial treatments are needed. Future studies should also ensure greater inclusion of racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities and should be culturally/linguistically adapted to improve treatment engagement and study outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 3","pages":"216-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2021.1944712","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1944712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective: Tobacco smoking is a major driver of premature mortality in people with serious mental illness (SMI; e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). This systematic literature review described randomized control trials of psychosocial smoking cessation interventions for people with SMI, rated their methodological rigor, evaluated the inclusion of racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities, and examined smoking cessation outcomes. Methods: Eligible studies included peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2020 that examined psychosocial smoking cessation interventions in people with SMI. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines to conduct our review and the Methodological Quality Rating Scale to evaluate methodological rigor. Results: Eighteen studies were included. Ten were categorized as high methodological rigor given their study characteristics (e.g., longer follow-up) and eight as lower methodological rigor based on their characteristics (e.g., not intent-to-treat). Racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities were under-represented in these studies. A range of psychosocial interventions were examined including motivational enhancements, smoking cessation education, cognitive behavioral strategies, and contingency management. Most studies also provided smoking cessation medications (e.g., NRT, bupropion), although provision was not always uniform across treatment conditions. Three studies found the intervention condition achieved significantly higher abstinence from smoking compared to the comparison group. Seven studies found the intervention condition achieved significantly higher reductions in smoking compared to the comparison group. Conclusions: Studies finding significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups shared common evidenced-based components, including providing smoking cessation medications (e.g., NRT, bupropion), motivational enhancement techniques, and cessation education and skills training, but differed in intensity (e.g., number and frequency of sessions), duration, and modality (e.g., group, individual, technology). Methodological limitations and a small number of studies finding significant between-group differences prevent the identification of the most effective psychosocial smoking cessation interventions. Clinical trial designs (e.g., SMART, factorial) that control for the provision of psychosocial medications and allow for the identification of optimal psychosocial treatments are needed. Future studies should also ensure greater inclusion of racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities and should be culturally/linguistically adapted to improve treatment engagement and study outcomes.

Abstract Image

对严重精神疾病患者的心理社会戒烟干预的系统评价。
目的:吸烟是严重精神疾病患者(SMI;例如,精神分裂症、双相情感障碍)。本系统文献综述描述了针对重度精神障碍患者的社会心理戒烟干预的随机对照试验,评估了其方法的严谨性,评估了种族/民族和性/性别少数群体的纳入情况,并检查了戒烟结果。方法:符合条件的研究包括2009年至2020年间发表的同行评审文章,这些文章检查了重度精神分裂症患者的心理社会戒烟干预措施。我们使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目来进行我们的评价,并使用方法学质量评定量表来评估方法学的严谨性。结果:纳入18项研究。根据其研究特征(例如,较长的随访时间),10项研究被归类为高方法严谨性,8项研究根据其特征(例如,无意治疗)被归类为较低方法严谨性。在这些研究中,种族/族裔和性/性别少数群体的代表性不足。研究人员检查了一系列心理社会干预措施,包括动机增强、戒烟教育、认知行为策略和应急管理。大多数研究还提供了戒烟药物(如NRT、安非他酮),尽管在不同的治疗条件下提供的药物并不总是统一的。三项研究发现,与对照组相比,干预组的戒烟率明显更高。七项研究发现,与对照组相比,干预组的吸烟率明显更高。结论:研究发现干预组和对照组之间存在显著差异,这些研究具有共同的循证成分,包括提供戒烟药物(如NRT、安非他酮)、动机增强技术、戒烟教育和技能培训,但在强度(如治疗次数和频率)、持续时间和方式(如群体、个人、技术)方面存在差异。方法学的局限性和少数发现组间显著差异的研究阻碍了最有效的社会心理戒烟干预措施的确定。需要临床试验设计(如SMART、析因),控制社会心理药物的提供,并允许确定最佳的社会心理治疗。未来的研究还应确保更多地纳入种族/民族和性/性别少数群体,并应在文化/语言上进行适应,以提高治疗参与度和研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信