Regional International Organizations and Health: A Framework for Analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Scott L Greer, Ana B Amaya, Holly Jarman, Helena Legido-Quigley, Martin McKee
{"title":"Regional International Organizations and Health: A Framework for Analysis.","authors":"Scott L Greer,&nbsp;Ana B Amaya,&nbsp;Holly Jarman,&nbsp;Helena Legido-Quigley,&nbsp;Martin McKee","doi":"10.1215/03616878-9417456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Regional international organizations (RIOs), from the South African Development Community (SADC) to the European Union (EU), are organizations that promote cooperation among countries in a specific region of the world. Asking what RIOs do to health and health policy by looking only at their formal health policies can understate their effects (e.g., a free trade agreement with no stated health goals can affect health policy) and overstate their effects (as with agreements full of ambition that did not deliver much).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopt a \"three-faces\" framework that identifies RIOs' direct health policies, the effects of their trade and market policies, and their effects on health via fiscal governance of their member states to better capture their health impact. We tested the usefulness of the framework by examining the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, EU, North American Free Trade Agreement, SADC, and the Union of South American Nations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All RIOs had some impact on health systems and policies, and, in many cases, the principal policies were not identified as health policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Such a framework will be useful in understanding the effects of RIOs on health systems and policies because it captures indirect and even unintended health effects in a way that permits development of explanatory theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9417456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Context: Regional international organizations (RIOs), from the South African Development Community (SADC) to the European Union (EU), are organizations that promote cooperation among countries in a specific region of the world. Asking what RIOs do to health and health policy by looking only at their formal health policies can understate their effects (e.g., a free trade agreement with no stated health goals can affect health policy) and overstate their effects (as with agreements full of ambition that did not deliver much).

Methods: We adopt a "three-faces" framework that identifies RIOs' direct health policies, the effects of their trade and market policies, and their effects on health via fiscal governance of their member states to better capture their health impact. We tested the usefulness of the framework by examining the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, EU, North American Free Trade Agreement, SADC, and the Union of South American Nations.

Findings: All RIOs had some impact on health systems and policies, and, in many cases, the principal policies were not identified as health policy.

Conclusions: Such a framework will be useful in understanding the effects of RIOs on health systems and policies because it captures indirect and even unintended health effects in a way that permits development of explanatory theories.

区域国际组织与卫生:分析框架。
背景:区域性国际组织(RIOs),从南非发展共同体(SADC)到欧洲联盟(EU),是促进世界特定区域内国家间合作的组织。仅通过考察其正式卫生政策来询问各区域组织对卫生和卫生政策的影响,可能会低估其影响(例如,没有明确卫生目标的自由贸易协定可能会影响卫生政策),并夸大其影响(例如,雄心勃勃的协定并没有带来多少成果)。方法:我们采用了一个“三面”框架,确定了区域组织的直接卫生政策、贸易和市场政策的影响,以及它们通过成员国的财政治理对健康的影响,以更好地捕捉它们对健康的影响。我们通过考察东南亚国家联盟、欧盟、北美自由贸易协定、南部非洲发展共同体和南美国家联盟来测试该框架的有效性。研究结果:所有的rio对卫生系统和政策都有一定的影响,而且在许多情况下,主要政策没有被确定为卫生政策。结论:这样一个框架将有助于理解非传染性疾病对卫生系统和政策的影响,因为它以一种允许发展解释性理论的方式捕捉了间接甚至意外的健康影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信