Parental Home Vision Testing of Children During Covid-19 Pandemic.

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-21 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.157
Sally Painter, Laura Ramm, Laura Wadlow, Maria O'Connor, Bavnesh Sond
{"title":"Parental Home Vision Testing of Children During Covid-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Sally Painter,&nbsp;Laura Ramm,&nbsp;Laura Wadlow,&nbsp;Maria O'Connor,&nbsp;Bavnesh Sond","doi":"10.22599/bioj.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated social distancing restrictions, which placed limitations on access to ophthalmic care to only those who had an imminent risk of sight loss. All other face-to-face consultations were converted to telephone consultations or were postponed. We investigated whether parents were able to test their child's vision using available home vision testing applications, with an aim to aid decision making during a telephone consultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Families with follow-up consultations at Birmingham Children's Hospital were asked to test their child's vision at home. Instructions for the use of Peek acuity, or iSight Pro, were emailed to a parent. Parents chose to use a particular app based on available devices at home. Parents were asked to test uniocular visual acuity twice. Home versus hospital acuity was correlated. Home acuity test-retest reliability was acquired. Parental feedback was obtained through questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and three families were contacted, 15 families completed home vision testing. Ten families used Peek acuity, five families used iSight Pro. Uniocular visual acuity test-retest reliability was 0.03 LogMAR. Home-hospital acuity testing had a bias of 0.14 LogMAR, hospital acuity yielding a lower LogMAR score. Most families who completed testing found it easy to do; however, some struggled, and 81 families did not undertake home vision testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptake of home vision testing was limited by parental engagement, most likely influenced by the current pandemic. Most families who undertook home vision testing were able to generate results that could be used for clinical decision making. Extending the impact of parental vision testing will require education by clinicians and further study to increase sample sizes and to improve confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269789/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated social distancing restrictions, which placed limitations on access to ophthalmic care to only those who had an imminent risk of sight loss. All other face-to-face consultations were converted to telephone consultations or were postponed. We investigated whether parents were able to test their child's vision using available home vision testing applications, with an aim to aid decision making during a telephone consultation.

Methods: Families with follow-up consultations at Birmingham Children's Hospital were asked to test their child's vision at home. Instructions for the use of Peek acuity, or iSight Pro, were emailed to a parent. Parents chose to use a particular app based on available devices at home. Parents were asked to test uniocular visual acuity twice. Home versus hospital acuity was correlated. Home acuity test-retest reliability was acquired. Parental feedback was obtained through questionnaires.

Results: One hundred and three families were contacted, 15 families completed home vision testing. Ten families used Peek acuity, five families used iSight Pro. Uniocular visual acuity test-retest reliability was 0.03 LogMAR. Home-hospital acuity testing had a bias of 0.14 LogMAR, hospital acuity yielding a lower LogMAR score. Most families who completed testing found it easy to do; however, some struggled, and 81 families did not undertake home vision testing.

Conclusions: Uptake of home vision testing was limited by parental engagement, most likely influenced by the current pandemic. Most families who undertook home vision testing were able to generate results that could be used for clinical decision making. Extending the impact of parental vision testing will require education by clinicians and further study to increase sample sizes and to improve confidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Covid-19大流行期间儿童父母家庭视力测试
背景:Covid-19大流行使社会距离限制成为必要,这限制了只有那些有即将失明风险的人才能获得眼科护理。所有其他面对面协商都改为电话协商或推迟进行。我们调查了父母是否能够使用可用的家庭视力测试应用程序测试孩子的视力,目的是在电话咨询期间帮助做出决定。方法:要求在伯明翰儿童医院随访会诊的家庭在家中检查孩子的视力。Peek acuity或iSight Pro的使用说明通过电子邮件发给了一位家长。家长们根据家中可用的设备选择使用特定的应用程序。家长被要求测试两次单眼视力。家庭和医院的视力是相关的。获得家庭视力测试重测信度。通过问卷调查获得家长反馈。结果:联系了103个家庭,15个家庭完成了家庭视力测试。10个家庭使用Peek锐度,5个家庭使用iSight Pro。单眼视力测试-重测信度为0.03 LogMAR。家庭医院视力测试的LogMAR偏差为0.14,医院视力测试的LogMAR评分较低。大多数完成检测的家庭发现这很容易做到;然而,有些家庭仍在挣扎,81个家庭没有进行家庭视力测试。结论:家庭视力检测的采用受到父母参与的限制,这很可能是受当前大流行的影响。大多数进行家庭视力测试的家庭能够产生可用于临床决策的结果。扩大父母视力测试的影响需要临床医生的教育和进一步的研究,以增加样本量和提高信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信