Pharmacological characterization of the chronic phase of the monoiodoacetate-induced rat model of osteoarthritis pain in the knee joint.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Felicity Y Han, David A Brockman, Janet R Nicholson, Laura Corradini, Maree T Smith
{"title":"Pharmacological characterization of the chronic phase of the monoiodoacetate-induced rat model of osteoarthritis pain in the knee joint.","authors":"Felicity Y Han,&nbsp;David A Brockman,&nbsp;Janet R Nicholson,&nbsp;Laura Corradini,&nbsp;Maree T Smith","doi":"10.1111/1440-1681.13551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, pain is the most debilitating symptom. Although it has been proposed that the chronic phase of the monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced rodent model of knee joint pain may be superior to other chronic or acute OA models for assessing the analgesic efficacy of novel molecules, relatively few pharmacological studies have been conducted in the chronic phase of this model. Hence, this study was designed to use pharmacological methods to characterize the chronic phase of the MIA-induced rat model of knee joint OA pain. Rats received a single intraarticular injection of MIA at 2.5 mg or vehicle (saline) into the left (ipsilateral) knee joint. Pain behaviour was assessed by measuring paw withdrawal thresholds (PWTs) in the hindpaws pre-MIA injection and twice-weekly until study completion on day 42. Mechanical allodynia was fully developed in the ipsilateral hindpaws (PWTs ≤6 g) from day 7 and it persisted until day 42. MIA-injected rats with PWTs ≤6 g in the ipsilateral hindpaws received single doses of one of four clinically available drugs that represent four distinct pharmacological classes, viz gabapentin, amitriptyline, meloxicam and morphine, according to a 'washout' protocol with at least 48 hours between successive doses. Gabapentin evoked dose-dependent anti-allodynia as did morphine whereas amitriptyline and meloxicam were inactive. Our findings are aligned with clinical data showing that gabapentin and morphine alleviated OA pain in the knee. The lack of efficacy of amitriptyline is consistent with the loss of descending diffuse noxious inhibitory controls reported by others in this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":10259,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":"48 11","pages":"1515-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1440-1681.13551","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.13551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

For patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, pain is the most debilitating symptom. Although it has been proposed that the chronic phase of the monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced rodent model of knee joint pain may be superior to other chronic or acute OA models for assessing the analgesic efficacy of novel molecules, relatively few pharmacological studies have been conducted in the chronic phase of this model. Hence, this study was designed to use pharmacological methods to characterize the chronic phase of the MIA-induced rat model of knee joint OA pain. Rats received a single intraarticular injection of MIA at 2.5 mg or vehicle (saline) into the left (ipsilateral) knee joint. Pain behaviour was assessed by measuring paw withdrawal thresholds (PWTs) in the hindpaws pre-MIA injection and twice-weekly until study completion on day 42. Mechanical allodynia was fully developed in the ipsilateral hindpaws (PWTs ≤6 g) from day 7 and it persisted until day 42. MIA-injected rats with PWTs ≤6 g in the ipsilateral hindpaws received single doses of one of four clinically available drugs that represent four distinct pharmacological classes, viz gabapentin, amitriptyline, meloxicam and morphine, according to a 'washout' protocol with at least 48 hours between successive doses. Gabapentin evoked dose-dependent anti-allodynia as did morphine whereas amitriptyline and meloxicam were inactive. Our findings are aligned with clinical data showing that gabapentin and morphine alleviated OA pain in the knee. The lack of efficacy of amitriptyline is consistent with the loss of descending diffuse noxious inhibitory controls reported by others in this model.

单碘乙酸盐诱导的大鼠膝关节骨关节炎疼痛模型慢性期的药理学特征。
对于膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者来说,疼痛是最使人虚弱的症状。虽然有人提出,单碘乙酸(MIA)诱导的啮齿动物膝关节疼痛模型的慢性期可能优于其他慢性或急性OA模型,以评估新分子的镇痛效果,但在该模型的慢性期进行的药理学研究相对较少。因此,本研究旨在采用药理学方法表征mia诱导的大鼠膝关节OA疼痛模型的慢性期。给大鼠左(同侧)膝关节单次注射2.5 mg或盐水。通过测量后爪在mia注射前的爪子退缩阈值(PWTs)来评估疼痛行为,每周两次,直到研究完成第42天。从第7天起,同侧后肢(PWTs≤6 g)的机械异常性疼痛完全发展,并持续到第42天。同侧后肢PWTs≤6 g的注射了mia的大鼠接受了四种临床可用药物中的一种的单剂量治疗,这四种药物代表四种不同的药理学类别,即加巴喷丁、阿米替林、美洛昔康和吗啡,根据“洗脱”方案,连续两次给药之间至少间隔48小时。加巴喷丁与吗啡一样具有剂量依赖性,而阿米替林和美洛昔康则无活性。我们的研究结果与临床数据一致,加巴喷丁和吗啡可减轻膝关节OA疼痛。阿米替林缺乏疗效与该模型中其他人报道的下降弥漫性有害抑制控制的丧失是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHYSIOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology is an international journal founded in 1974 by Mike Rand, Austin Doyle, John Coghlan and Paul Korner. Our focus is new frontiers in physiology and pharmacology, emphasizing the translation of basic research to clinical practice. We publish original articles, invited reviews and our exciting, cutting-edge Frontiers-in-Research series’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信