Enhanced Recovery and Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Evans, Maggie McCarter, Obafunbi Abimbola, Erinn M Myers
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery and Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Sarah Evans,&nbsp;Maggie McCarter,&nbsp;Obafunbi Abimbola,&nbsp;Erinn M Myers","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was associated with a higher rate of same-day discharge after robot-assisted or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to describe the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A historical control, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy comparing rates of same-day discharge before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol was conducted. Secondary outcomes were obtained by comparing women discharged the same day with those discharged postoperative day ≥1, including postoperative complications and unplanned postoperative patient encounters within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression was performed to control for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 166 women identified (83 before ERAS implementation; 83 after ERAS implementation), 43 underwent same-day discharge versus 123 admitted overnight. The rate of same-day discharge increased 28 percentage points after ERAS implementation (12% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Compared with women admitted overnight, same-day discharge women had shorter procedures (154 vs 173 minutes, P = 0.01), spent longer time in the postanesthesia care unit (130 vs 106 minutes, P = 0.01), and were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (58% vs 28%, P < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, ERAS was associated with increased odds of same-day discharge (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-11.09). There were no differences in unplanned postoperative patient contacts or postoperative complications within 30 days between same-day discharge and overnight admission groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with a 3-fold increase in same-day discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 12","pages":"740-745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was associated with a higher rate of same-day discharge after robot-assisted or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to describe the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after these procedures.

Methods: A historical control, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy comparing rates of same-day discharge before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol was conducted. Secondary outcomes were obtained by comparing women discharged the same day with those discharged postoperative day ≥1, including postoperative complications and unplanned postoperative patient encounters within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression was performed to control for potential confounders.

Results: Of the 166 women identified (83 before ERAS implementation; 83 after ERAS implementation), 43 underwent same-day discharge versus 123 admitted overnight. The rate of same-day discharge increased 28 percentage points after ERAS implementation (12% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Compared with women admitted overnight, same-day discharge women had shorter procedures (154 vs 173 minutes, P = 0.01), spent longer time in the postanesthesia care unit (130 vs 106 minutes, P = 0.01), and were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (58% vs 28%, P < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, ERAS was associated with increased odds of same-day discharge (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-11.09). There were no differences in unplanned postoperative patient contacts or postoperative complications within 30 days between same-day discharge and overnight admission groups.

Conclusions: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with a 3-fold increase in same-day discharge.

微创骶骶固定术后增强恢复和当日出院。
目的:本研究的目的是评估增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案是否与机器人辅助或腹腔镜骶髋固定术后较高的当日出院率相关,并描述这些手术后当日出院的安全性和可行性。方法:对接受微创骶骶固定术的女性进行历史对照、回顾性队列研究,比较ERAS方案实施前后当日出院率。通过比较当天出院的妇女和术后≥1天出院的妇女获得次要结局,包括术后并发症和手术后30天内意外的术后患者遭遇。采用逻辑回归控制潜在混杂因素。结果:在166名妇女中(实施ERAS前83名;实施ERAS后83例),当日出院43例,过夜出院123例。ERAS实施后当日出院率提高28个百分点(12% vs 40%, P < 0.01)。与过夜住院的女性相比,当天出院的女性手术时间较短(154分钟对173分钟,P = 0.01),在麻醉后护理单元花费的时间较长(130分钟对106分钟,P = 0.01),并且更有可能使用Foley导尿管出院(58%对28%,P < 0.01)。经多变量logistic回归分析,ERAS与当日出院几率增加相关(优势比4.91;95%置信区间,2.17-11.09)。当日出院组和过夜住院组在术后30天内患者意外接触和术后并发症方面无差异。结论:微创骶colpop固定术ERAS方案的实施与当日出院率增加3倍相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信