Adherence to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Muscle Impairment in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Louise C Burgess, Paul Taylor, Thomas W Wainwright, Shayan Bahadori, Ian D Swain
{"title":"Adherence to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Muscle Impairment in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Louise C Burgess, Paul Taylor, Thomas W Wainwright, Shayan Bahadori, Ian D Swain","doi":"10.1177/11795441211028746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) provides a promising approach to counteract muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis, and to expedite recovery from joint replacement surgery. Nonetheless, application into clinical orthopaedic practice remains limited, partly due to concerns regarding patient tolerance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to quantify levels of adherence to NMES interventions for muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis and identify strategies to increase compliance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a web-based literature review, completed in December 2020. The databases sourced included the Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete and PubMed.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies were included if they were: (i) conducted in cohorts of adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis; (ii) a protocol of electrical muscle stimulation prescribed to treat muscle impairment; and (iii) reported intervention adherence or attrition rate. Data were extracted on adherence rate, reasons for non-adherence and potential strategies to increase adherence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 120 articles, of which 15 studies were considered eligible and included in the analysis (n = 922). All NMES treatment was applied to the quadriceps, with 1 study targeting the quadriceps and calves. The mean PEDRO score of the included studies was 6.80 out of a possible 10 (range 6-8). Mean adherence did not differ between groups receiving treatment with NMES (85% ± 12%) and control groups receiving voluntary exercise or education (84% ± 9%) (<i>P</i> = .97). Reasons for non-adherence or attrition included a dislike of the device, dizziness, pain and discomfort. Strategies to increase adherence included NMES education, a familiarisation period, supervision, setting thresholds based upon patient tolerance, monitoring pain levels during stimulation and using built-in adherence trackers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review indicates that adherence to NMES interventions for muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis in clinical trials does not differ to control groups receiving education or voluntary exercise, and hence should not be a barrier to application in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"11795441211028746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795441211028746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) provides a promising approach to counteract muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis, and to expedite recovery from joint replacement surgery. Nonetheless, application into clinical orthopaedic practice remains limited, partly due to concerns regarding patient tolerance.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to quantify levels of adherence to NMES interventions for muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis and identify strategies to increase compliance.

Data sources: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a web-based literature review, completed in December 2020. The databases sourced included the Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete and PubMed.

Eligibility criteria: Studies were included if they were: (i) conducted in cohorts of adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis; (ii) a protocol of electrical muscle stimulation prescribed to treat muscle impairment; and (iii) reported intervention adherence or attrition rate. Data were extracted on adherence rate, reasons for non-adherence and potential strategies to increase adherence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

Results: The search yielded 120 articles, of which 15 studies were considered eligible and included in the analysis (n = 922). All NMES treatment was applied to the quadriceps, with 1 study targeting the quadriceps and calves. The mean PEDRO score of the included studies was 6.80 out of a possible 10 (range 6-8). Mean adherence did not differ between groups receiving treatment with NMES (85% ± 12%) and control groups receiving voluntary exercise or education (84% ± 9%) (P = .97). Reasons for non-adherence or attrition included a dislike of the device, dizziness, pain and discomfort. Strategies to increase adherence included NMES education, a familiarisation period, supervision, setting thresholds based upon patient tolerance, monitoring pain levels during stimulation and using built-in adherence trackers.

Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that adherence to NMES interventions for muscle impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis in clinical trials does not differ to control groups receiving education or voluntary exercise, and hence should not be a barrier to application in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

坚持神经肌肉电刺激干预治疗髋关节和膝关节骨性关节炎的肌肉损伤:系统回顾。
背景:神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是对抗髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎肌肉损伤以及加快关节置换手术后恢复的一种很有前景的方法。然而,NMES 在骨科临床实践中的应用仍然有限,部分原因是担心患者的耐受性:本系统综述旨在量化对髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎肌肉损伤进行 NMES 干预的依从性水平,并确定提高依从性的策略:通过网络文献综述确定了随机对照试验(RCT),该综述于2020年12月完成。检索的数据库包括 Cochrane Library、CINAHL Complete、Medline Complete 和 PubMed:符合以下条件的研究均可纳入(i) 以患有髋关节或膝关节骨关节炎的成人为研究对象;(ii) 制定了肌肉电刺激方案以治疗肌肉损伤;(iii) 报告了干预的依从性或流失率。提取的数据包括坚持率、不坚持的原因以及提高坚持率的潜在策略。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表对偏倚风险进行评估:搜索共获得 120 篇文章,其中 15 项研究被认为符合条件并纳入分析(n = 922)。所有 NMES 治疗均针对股四头肌,其中一项研究针对股四头肌和小腿。纳入研究的 PEDRO 平均分为 6.80 分(满分为 10 分,范围为 6-8 分)。接受 NMES 治疗组(85% ± 12%)和接受自愿锻炼或教育的对照组(84% ± 9%)的平均坚持率没有差异(P = 0.97)。不坚持或放弃治疗的原因包括不喜欢该装置、头晕、疼痛和不适。提高依从性的策略包括 NMES 教育、熟悉期、监督、根据患者耐受程度设置阈值、监测刺激过程中的疼痛程度以及使用内置的依从性跟踪器:本系统综述表明,在临床试验中,针对髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎肌肉损伤的 NMES 干预疗法的依从性与接受教育或自愿锻炼的对照组并无差异,因此不应成为临床实践中应用的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信