Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-25 DOI:10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.180
Burcu Günal-Abduljalil, Özay Önöral, Salim Ongun
{"title":"Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application.","authors":"Burcu Günal-Abduljalil,&nbsp;Özay Önöral,&nbsp;Salim Ongun","doi":"10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the influence of various micromechanical surface conditioning (MSC) strategies with or without coupling agent (silane) application on the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of resin- matrix ceramics (RMCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>GC Cerasmart (GC), Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), Voco Grandio (VG), and Brilliant Crios (BC) were cut into 1.0-mm-thick slices (n = 32 per RMC) and separated into four groups according to the MSC strategy applied: control-no conditioning (C), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (APA), 2W- and 3W-Er,Cr:YSGG group coding is missing. The specimens in each group were further separated into silane-applied and silane-free subgroups. Each specimen received two resin cement microtubules (n = 8 per subgroup). A shear force was applied to the adhesive interface through a universal test machine and µSBS values were measured. Data were statistically analyzed by using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. Failure patterns were scrutinized under stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RMC material type, MSC strategy, and silanization influenced the µSBS values (<i>P</i><.05). In comparison to the control group, µSBS values increased after all other MSC strategies (<i>P</i><.05) while the differences among these strategies were insignificant (<i>P</i>>.05). For control and APA, there were insignificant differences between RMCs (<i>P</i>>.05). The silanization decreased µSBS values of RMCs except for VE. Considerable declines were observed in GC and BC (<i>P</i><.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSC strategies can enhance bond strength values at the RMC - cement interface. However, the choice of MSC strategy is dependent on RMC material type and each RMC can require a dedicated way of conditioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/eb/jap-13-180.PMC8250191.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the influence of various micromechanical surface conditioning (MSC) strategies with or without coupling agent (silane) application on the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of resin- matrix ceramics (RMCs).

Materials and methods: GC Cerasmart (GC), Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), Voco Grandio (VG), and Brilliant Crios (BC) were cut into 1.0-mm-thick slices (n = 32 per RMC) and separated into four groups according to the MSC strategy applied: control-no conditioning (C), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (APA), 2W- and 3W-Er,Cr:YSGG group coding is missing. The specimens in each group were further separated into silane-applied and silane-free subgroups. Each specimen received two resin cement microtubules (n = 8 per subgroup). A shear force was applied to the adhesive interface through a universal test machine and µSBS values were measured. Data were statistically analyzed by using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. Failure patterns were scrutinized under stereomicroscope.

Results: RMC material type, MSC strategy, and silanization influenced the µSBS values (P<.05). In comparison to the control group, µSBS values increased after all other MSC strategies (P<.05) while the differences among these strategies were insignificant (P>.05). For control and APA, there were insignificant differences between RMCs (P>.05). The silanization decreased µSBS values of RMCs except for VE. Considerable declines were observed in GC and BC (P<.05).

Conclusion: MSC strategies can enhance bond strength values at the RMC - cement interface. However, the choice of MSC strategy is dependent on RMC material type and each RMC can require a dedicated way of conditioning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用偶联剂或不使用偶联剂的树脂基陶瓷在不同表面处理策略下的微剪切结合强度。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同微机械表面调理(MSC)策略对树脂基陶瓷(RMCs)微剪切结合强度(µSBS)的影响。材料和方法:将GC Cerasmart (GC)、Lava Ultimate (LU)、Vita Enamic (VE)、Voco Grandio (VG)和Brilliant Crios (BC)切成1.0 mm厚的薄片(每RMC n = 32),根据采用的MSC策略分为4组:control-no - conditioning (C)、air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (APA)、2W-和3W-Er,Cr:YSGG组编码缺失。各组标本进一步分为施硅烷组和不施硅烷组。每个标本接受2个树脂水泥微管(每亚组n = 8)。通过万能试验机对粘接界面施加剪切力,测量µSBS值。数据采用3-way ANOVA和Tukey HSD检验进行统计学分析。在体视显微镜下观察失效模式。结果:RMC材料类型、MSC策略和硅烷化对µSBS值有影响(PPP> 0.05)。对于对照组和APA, rmc之间差异不显著(P> 0.05)。除VE外,硅烷化降低了RMCs的µSBS值。结论:MSC策略可以提高RMC -水泥界面的粘结强度值。然而,MSC策略的选择取决于RMC材料类型,每个RMC可能需要专用的调节方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信