Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874306402014010062
Salim Surani, Munish Sharma, Kevin Middagh, Hector Bernal, Joseph Varon, Iqbal Ratnani, Humayun Anjum, Alamgir Khan
{"title":"Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Salim Surani,&nbsp;Munish Sharma,&nbsp;Kevin Middagh,&nbsp;Hector Bernal,&nbsp;Joseph Varon,&nbsp;Iqbal Ratnani,&nbsp;Humayun Anjum,&nbsp;Alamgir Khan","doi":"10.2174/1874306402014010062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) is associated with a higher cost of care and increased morbidity and mortality. Patients requiring PMV are referred mostly to Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) facilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if protocol-driven weaning from mechanical ventilator by Respiratory Therapist (RT) would result in quicker weaning from mechanical ventilation, cost-effectiveness, and decreased mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted that utilized protocol-driven ventilator weaning by respiratory therapist (RT) as a part of the Respiratory Disease Certification Program (RDCP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 patients on mechanical ventilation before initiation of protocol-based ventilator weaning formed the control group. 111 patients on mechanical ventilation after implementation of the protocol formed the study group. Time to wean from the mechanical ventilation before the implementation of protocol-driven weaning by RT was 16.76 +/- 18.91 days, while that after the implementation of protocol was 7.67 +/- 6.58 days (p < 0.0001). Mortality proportion in patients after implementation of protocol-based ventilator weaning was 0.21 as compared to 0.37 in the control group (p=0.0153). The daily cost of patient care for the LTAC while on mechanical ventilation was $2200/day per patient while it was $ 1400/day per patient while not on mechanical ventilation leading to significant cost savings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Protocol-driven liberation from mechanical ventilation in LTAC by RT can significantly decrease the duration of a mechanical ventilator, leading to decreased mortality and cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"62-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774095/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306402014010062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) is associated with a higher cost of care and increased morbidity and mortality. Patients requiring PMV are referred mostly to Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) facilities.

Objective: To determine if protocol-driven weaning from mechanical ventilator by Respiratory Therapist (RT) would result in quicker weaning from mechanical ventilation, cost-effectiveness, and decreased mortality.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted that utilized protocol-driven ventilator weaning by respiratory therapist (RT) as a part of the Respiratory Disease Certification Program (RDCP).

Results: 51 patients on mechanical ventilation before initiation of protocol-based ventilator weaning formed the control group. 111 patients on mechanical ventilation after implementation of the protocol formed the study group. Time to wean from the mechanical ventilation before the implementation of protocol-driven weaning by RT was 16.76 +/- 18.91 days, while that after the implementation of protocol was 7.67 +/- 6.58 days (p < 0.0001). Mortality proportion in patients after implementation of protocol-based ventilator weaning was 0.21 as compared to 0.37 in the control group (p=0.0153). The daily cost of patient care for the LTAC while on mechanical ventilation was $2200/day per patient while it was $ 1400/day per patient while not on mechanical ventilation leading to significant cost savings.

Conclusion: Protocol-driven liberation from mechanical ventilation in LTAC by RT can significantly decrease the duration of a mechanical ventilator, leading to decreased mortality and cost savings.

长期急性护理医院机械呼吸机脱机:回顾性分析。
背景:延长机械通气(PMV)与较高的护理费用和发病率和死亡率增加有关。需要PMV的患者大多被转介到长期急性护理(LTAC)设施。目的:确定由呼吸治疗师(RT)进行方案驱动的机械呼吸机脱机是否会导致更快的机械呼吸机脱机、成本效益和降低死亡率。方法:进行回顾性病例对照研究,将呼吸治疗师(RT)作为呼吸疾病认证计划(RDCP)的一部分使用协议驱动的呼吸机脱机。结果:51例机械通气患者为对照组。111例实施方案后机械通气患者组成研究组。实施方案驱动RT脱机前机械通气时间为16.76 +/- 18.91天,实施方案后为7.67 +/- 6.58天(p < 0.0001)。实施基于方案的呼吸机脱机后患者的死亡率为0.21,对照组为0.37 (p=0.0153)。使用机械通气时,LTAC患者的每日护理费用为每位患者2200美元/天,而不使用机械通气时,每位患者的每日护理费用为1400美元/天,这大大节省了成本。结论:在方案驱动下,LTAC通过RT从机械通气中解放出来,可以显著减少机械呼吸机的持续时间,从而降低死亡率并节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信