Development and Initial Validation of the Perceptual Assessment of Memory (PASSOM): A Simulator Study.

Justin C Koenitzer, Janice E Herron, Jesse W Whitlow, Catherine M Barbuscak, Nitin R Patel, Ryan Pletcher, Jerilyn Christensen
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Perceptual Assessment of Memory (PASSOM): A Simulator Study.","authors":"Justin C Koenitzer,&nbsp;Janice E Herron,&nbsp;Jesse W Whitlow,&nbsp;Catherine M Barbuscak,&nbsp;Nitin R Patel,&nbsp;Ryan Pletcher,&nbsp;Jerilyn Christensen","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaa126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Performance validity tests (PVTs) are an integral component of neuropsychological assessment. There is a need for the development of more PVTs, especially those employing covert determinations. The aim of the present study was to provide initial validation of a new computerized PVT, the Perceptual Assessment of Memory (PASSOM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 58 undergraduate students randomly assigned to a simulator (SIM) or control (CON) group. All participants were provided written instructions for their role prior to testing and were administered the PASSOM as part of a brief battery of neurocognitive tests. Indices of interest included response accuracy for Trials 1 and 2, and total errors across Trials, as well as response time (RT) for Trials 1 and 2, and total RT for both Trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SIM group produced significantly more errors than the CON group for Trials 1 and 2, and committed more total errors across trials. Significantly longer response latencies were found for the SIM group compared to the CON group for all RT indices examined. Linear regression modeling indicated excellent group classification for all indices studied, with areas under the curve ranging from 0.92 to 0.95. Sensitivity and specificity rates were good for several cut scores across all of the accuracy and RT indices, and sensitivity improved greatly by combining RT cut scores with the more traditional accuracy cut scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate the ability of the PASSOM to distinguish individuals instructed to feign cognitive impairment from those told to perform to the best of their ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"1326-1340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/arclin/acaa126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Performance validity tests (PVTs) are an integral component of neuropsychological assessment. There is a need for the development of more PVTs, especially those employing covert determinations. The aim of the present study was to provide initial validation of a new computerized PVT, the Perceptual Assessment of Memory (PASSOM).

Method: Participants were 58 undergraduate students randomly assigned to a simulator (SIM) or control (CON) group. All participants were provided written instructions for their role prior to testing and were administered the PASSOM as part of a brief battery of neurocognitive tests. Indices of interest included response accuracy for Trials 1 and 2, and total errors across Trials, as well as response time (RT) for Trials 1 and 2, and total RT for both Trials.

Results: The SIM group produced significantly more errors than the CON group for Trials 1 and 2, and committed more total errors across trials. Significantly longer response latencies were found for the SIM group compared to the CON group for all RT indices examined. Linear regression modeling indicated excellent group classification for all indices studied, with areas under the curve ranging from 0.92 to 0.95. Sensitivity and specificity rates were good for several cut scores across all of the accuracy and RT indices, and sensitivity improved greatly by combining RT cut scores with the more traditional accuracy cut scores.

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the ability of the PASSOM to distinguish individuals instructed to feign cognitive impairment from those told to perform to the best of their ability.

记忆知觉评估(PASSOM)的发展和初步验证:一个模拟器研究。
目的:效能效度测试(pvt)是神经心理学评估的重要组成部分。有必要开发更多的pvt,特别是那些采用隐蔽确定的pvt。本研究的目的是提供一个新的计算机PVT的初步验证,知觉评估记忆(PASSOM)。方法:研究对象为58名大学生,随机分为模拟组(SIM)和对照组(CON)。所有参与者在测试前都被提供了关于他们角色的书面说明,并被进行PASSOM作为一系列简短的神经认知测试的一部分。感兴趣的指标包括试验1和2的反应准确性,试验间的总误差,试验1和2的反应时间(RT),以及两个试验的总RT。结果:在试验1和2中,SIM组比CON组产生了更多的错误,并且在整个试验中产生了更多的总错误。在所有检查的RT指标中,与CON组相比,SIM组的反应延迟明显更长。线性回归模型表明,各指标的分类效果良好,曲线下面积在0.92 ~ 0.95之间。在所有准确性和RT指标中,多个切口评分的敏感性和特异性都很好,将RT切口评分与更传统的准确性切口评分结合使用,敏感性大大提高。结论:研究结果表明PASSOM能够区分被要求假装认知障碍的个体和被要求尽其所能表现的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信