Differences in fungal contamination of broiler litter between summer and winter fattening periods.

Mario Ostović, Ivica Ravić, Matija Kovačić, Anamaria Ekert Kabalin, Kristina Matković, Ivana Sabolek, Željko Pavičić, Sven Menčik, Danijela Horvatek Tomić
{"title":"Differences in fungal contamination of broiler litter between summer and winter fattening periods.","authors":"Mario Ostović,&nbsp;Ivica Ravić,&nbsp;Matija Kovačić,&nbsp;Anamaria Ekert Kabalin,&nbsp;Kristina Matković,&nbsp;Ivana Sabolek,&nbsp;Željko Pavičić,&nbsp;Sven Menčik,&nbsp;Danijela Horvatek Tomić","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2021-72-3508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare fungal contamination of poultry litter between warm and cold seasons. It was carried out in commercial production conditions over two five-week fattening periods: one in the summer (July-August) and one in the winter (December-January). Broilers were reared on a litter composed of chopped straw and sawdust. Litter fungal concentration and composition were investigated weekly, along with litter temperature, moisture, and pH. Litter concentration of total fungi increased over both fattening periods, with no differences in median concentrations between them. Season also had no effect on yeast, <i>Aspergillus</i> section <i>Nigri</i>, and <i>Cladosporium</i>, <i>Fusarium</i>, and <i>Rhizopus</i> spp. concentrations, while the <i>Aspergillus</i> section <i>Flavi</i> and <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. combined showed higher concentrations in the summer, and <i>Mucor</i> and <i>Penicillium</i> spp. in the winter. Total fungal concentration highly correlated with litter temperature, moisture, and pH, regardless of the season. Our findings can be useful in the assessment and control of potential harmful effect of fungi on the health of poultry and poultry farm workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520565,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju","volume":" ","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/39/aiht-72-140.PMC8265200.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2021-72-3508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aimed to compare fungal contamination of poultry litter between warm and cold seasons. It was carried out in commercial production conditions over two five-week fattening periods: one in the summer (July-August) and one in the winter (December-January). Broilers were reared on a litter composed of chopped straw and sawdust. Litter fungal concentration and composition were investigated weekly, along with litter temperature, moisture, and pH. Litter concentration of total fungi increased over both fattening periods, with no differences in median concentrations between them. Season also had no effect on yeast, Aspergillus section Nigri, and Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Rhizopus spp. concentrations, while the Aspergillus section Flavi and Aspergillus spp. combined showed higher concentrations in the summer, and Mucor and Penicillium spp. in the winter. Total fungal concentration highly correlated with litter temperature, moisture, and pH, regardless of the season. Our findings can be useful in the assessment and control of potential harmful effect of fungi on the health of poultry and poultry farm workers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

夏育期和冬育期肉鸡产仔真菌污染的差异。
本研究旨在比较温暖季节和寒冷季节家禽粪便的真菌污染情况。该试验在商业生产条件下进行,分两个5周育肥期:一个在夏季(7 - 8月),一个在冬季(12 - 1月)。肉鸡饲养在由切碎的稻草和锯末组成的窝里。每周调查凋落物真菌浓度和组成,以及凋落物温度、湿度和ph值。两个育肥期凋落物总真菌浓度均有所增加,但中位数浓度无差异。季节对酵母菌、黑曲霉、枝孢菌、镰刀菌和根霉的浓度也没有影响,而黄曲霉和曲霉的组合在夏季浓度较高,而毛霉菌和青霉在冬季浓度较高。真菌总浓度与凋落物温度、湿度和pH值高度相关,与季节无关。我们的研究结果可用于评估和控制真菌对家禽和家禽养殖场工人健康的潜在有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信