Extending the Analysis of Functional Ability Trajectories to Unexplored National Contexts: The Case of Chile.

Ignacio Madero-Cabib, Pablo Villalobos Dintrans, Jorge Browne Salas
{"title":"Extending the Analysis of Functional Ability Trajectories to Unexplored National Contexts: The Case of Chile.","authors":"Ignacio Madero-Cabib,&nbsp;Pablo Villalobos Dintrans,&nbsp;Jorge Browne Salas","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbab116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the enormous advances in the field, most evidence about functional ability trajectories in old age comes from studies conducted in developed and high-income countries. This research aims to build on these previous advances to examine functional ability trajectories in Chile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Drawing on a robust, publicly available 15-year panel data set (2004-2018), and using sequence analysis, we examine functional ability trajectories types among 4 age groups (people aged 46-50, 51-55, 56-60, and 61-64 at baseline). Then, we analyze trajectories' dynamics looking at intraindividual health-declining and health-recovery transitions between functional ability statuses, within each trajectory type. Finally, we assess how multiple baseline individual characteristics predict the likelihood of following a functional ability trajectory type, using multinomial regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all age groups, an important fraction (between 26% and 50%) reports stable healthy trajectories, and between 10% and 20% follow equivocal-declining trajectories (i.e., exhibiting both health-declining and health-recovery intraindividual transitions), suggesting that age might not be the main source of heterogeneity in functional ability trajectories. Overall, women, lower educated people, nonworking individuals, and people with a higher burden of chronic conditions at baseline are more prevalent among health-declining trajectory types; however, these results are not constant across the age groups analyzed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nationally focused study reinforces the feasibility and usefulness of an in-depth analysis of functional ability trajectories in old age. The study findings can be crucial to define different prevention strategies according to the functional ability path that an individual might follow, especially in countries like Chile that currently navigate the challenges of population aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":520811,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1280-1293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the enormous advances in the field, most evidence about functional ability trajectories in old age comes from studies conducted in developed and high-income countries. This research aims to build on these previous advances to examine functional ability trajectories in Chile.

Method: Drawing on a robust, publicly available 15-year panel data set (2004-2018), and using sequence analysis, we examine functional ability trajectories types among 4 age groups (people aged 46-50, 51-55, 56-60, and 61-64 at baseline). Then, we analyze trajectories' dynamics looking at intraindividual health-declining and health-recovery transitions between functional ability statuses, within each trajectory type. Finally, we assess how multiple baseline individual characteristics predict the likelihood of following a functional ability trajectory type, using multinomial regression models.

Results: Across all age groups, an important fraction (between 26% and 50%) reports stable healthy trajectories, and between 10% and 20% follow equivocal-declining trajectories (i.e., exhibiting both health-declining and health-recovery intraindividual transitions), suggesting that age might not be the main source of heterogeneity in functional ability trajectories. Overall, women, lower educated people, nonworking individuals, and people with a higher burden of chronic conditions at baseline are more prevalent among health-declining trajectory types; however, these results are not constant across the age groups analyzed.

Discussion: This nationally focused study reinforces the feasibility and usefulness of an in-depth analysis of functional ability trajectories in old age. The study findings can be crucial to define different prevention strategies according to the functional ability path that an individual might follow, especially in countries like Chile that currently navigate the challenges of population aging.

将功能能力轨迹分析扩展到未开发的国家背景:以智利为例。
目标:尽管该领域取得了巨大进步,但大多数关于老年功能能力轨迹的证据来自发达国家和高收入国家进行的研究。这项研究的目的是建立在这些以前的进展,以检查在智利的功能能力轨迹。方法:利用稳健的、可公开获得的15年面板数据集(2004-2018),并使用序列分析,研究了4个年龄组(基线年龄为46-50岁、51-55岁、56-60岁和61-64岁)的功能能力轨迹类型。然后,我们分析了每种轨迹类型中个体内部功能能力状态之间健康下降和健康恢复的动态变化。最后,我们使用多项回归模型评估了多重基线个体特征如何预测遵循功能性能力轨迹类型的可能性。结果:在所有年龄组中,很大一部分(26%至50%)报告了稳定的健康轨迹,10%至20%遵循模棱两可的下降轨迹(即,表现出健康下降和健康恢复的个体内部过渡),这表明年龄可能不是功能能力轨迹异质性的主要来源。总体而言,女性、受教育程度较低的人、非工作个体和基线时慢性病负担较高的人在健康状况下降的轨迹类型中更为普遍;然而,这些结果在分析的各个年龄组中并不一致。讨论:这项以全国为重点的研究加强了对老年功能能力轨迹进行深入分析的可行性和实用性。研究结果对于根据个人可能遵循的功能能力路径定义不同的预防策略至关重要,特别是在像智利这样目前正在应对人口老龄化挑战的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信