A Cross-Sectional Study on the Affordable Care Act from the Perspective of People Living with HIV: The Interplay between Knowledge, Stigma, Trust, and Attitudes.

IF 1.1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
AIDS Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2020-12-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/6081721
Christopher Kaperak, Sarah Elwood, Tamara Saint-Surin, Christopher Winstead-Derlega, Robert O Brennan, Rebecca Dillingham, Kathleen A McManus
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Study on the Affordable Care Act from the Perspective of People Living with HIV: The Interplay between Knowledge, Stigma, Trust, and Attitudes.","authors":"Christopher Kaperak,&nbsp;Sarah Elwood,&nbsp;Tamara Saint-Surin,&nbsp;Christopher Winstead-Derlega,&nbsp;Robert O Brennan,&nbsp;Rebecca Dillingham,&nbsp;Kathleen A McManus","doi":"10.1155/2020/6081721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) purchased Affordable Care Act (ACA) Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) for low-income people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, little has been published about PLWH's perspective on the ACA. We explored ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, trust in the healthcare system, and ACA attitudes among PLWH with ADAP-funded QHPs in Virginia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were surveyed about demographic characteristics, ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, trust in various healthcare and government entities, and attitudes toward the ACA. Descriptive statistics were used. We assessed for associations (1) between baseline characteristics and correct ACA knowledge, HIV-related stigma, trust, and ACA attitudes and (2) between correct ACA knowledge and the following data: sources of ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, and trust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 53) were a vulnerable population based on the assessment of social determinants of health, and 30% had correct ACA knowledge. Almost three-fourths of participants used HIV clinic case managers for ACA information. Participants who used websites for ACA information had correct ACA knowledge more often compared to those that did not (71% vs. 15%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Those with correct ACA knowledge had lower stigma scores compared to those without correct ACA knowledge (93.8; SD: 15.4 vs. 108; SD: 20.3; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Participants trusted HIV clinicians more than general clinicians and insurance companies. No association was found between having correct ACA knowledge and endorsing having enough information about the ACA to understand how it will impact their HIV care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Websites imparted accurate ACA information. HIV clinic case managers were the most used source, and HIV clinicians were a trusted source of information. HIV clinicians and case managers should consider disseminating information about the ACA and its impact on HIV care delivery via internet videos. Lack of internet and stigma are a threat to PLWH gaining actionable healthcare information.</p>","PeriodicalId":46303,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Treatment","volume":"2020 ","pages":"6081721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744239/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6081721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Many AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) purchased Affordable Care Act (ACA) Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) for low-income people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, little has been published about PLWH's perspective on the ACA. We explored ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, trust in the healthcare system, and ACA attitudes among PLWH with ADAP-funded QHPs in Virginia.

Methods: Participants were surveyed about demographic characteristics, ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, trust in various healthcare and government entities, and attitudes toward the ACA. Descriptive statistics were used. We assessed for associations (1) between baseline characteristics and correct ACA knowledge, HIV-related stigma, trust, and ACA attitudes and (2) between correct ACA knowledge and the following data: sources of ACA knowledge, HIV stigma, and trust.

Results: Participants (n = 53) were a vulnerable population based on the assessment of social determinants of health, and 30% had correct ACA knowledge. Almost three-fourths of participants used HIV clinic case managers for ACA information. Participants who used websites for ACA information had correct ACA knowledge more often compared to those that did not (71% vs. 15%; p = 0.001). Those with correct ACA knowledge had lower stigma scores compared to those without correct ACA knowledge (93.8; SD: 15.4 vs. 108; SD: 20.3; p = 0.01). Participants trusted HIV clinicians more than general clinicians and insurance companies. No association was found between having correct ACA knowledge and endorsing having enough information about the ACA to understand how it will impact their HIV care.

Conclusions: Websites imparted accurate ACA information. HIV clinic case managers were the most used source, and HIV clinicians were a trusted source of information. HIV clinicians and case managers should consider disseminating information about the ACA and its impact on HIV care delivery via internet videos. Lack of internet and stigma are a threat to PLWH gaining actionable healthcare information.

Abstract Image

从艾滋病毒感染者的角度对平价医疗法案的横断面研究:知识,耻辱,信任和态度之间的相互作用。
背景:许多艾滋病药物援助项目(ADAPs)为低收入艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)购买了平价医疗法案(ACA)合格健康计划(QHPs)。迄今为止,关于PLWH对ACA的看法的文章很少发表。我们探讨了ACA知识、HIV污名、对医疗保健系统的信任,以及在弗吉尼亚州接受aap资助的QHPs的PLWH中ACA的态度。方法:调查参与者的人口统计学特征、ACA知识、HIV污名、对各种医疗保健和政府机构的信任以及对ACA的态度。采用描述性统计。我们评估了(1)基线特征与正确ACA知识、HIV相关污名、信任和ACA态度之间的关系,以及(2)正确ACA知识与以下数据之间的关系:ACA知识来源、HIV污名和信任。结果:根据健康的社会决定因素评估,参与者(n = 53)是弱势群体,30%的人有正确的ACA知识。几乎四分之三的参与者使用艾滋病诊所病例管理器获取ACA信息。使用网站获取ACA信息的参与者比不使用网站的参与者更经常拥有正确的ACA知识(71%对15%;p = 0.001)。有正确ACA知识者的污名得分较无正确ACA知识者低(93.8;SD: 15.4 vs. 108;SD: 20.3;p = 0.01)。参与者比一般临床医生和保险公司更信任艾滋病毒临床医生。没有发现有正确的ACA知识和认可有足够的ACA信息来理解它将如何影响他们的艾滋病护理之间的联系。结论:网站提供了准确的ACA信息。艾滋病毒临床病例管理人员是最常用的信息来源,艾滋病毒临床医生是值得信赖的信息来源。艾滋病毒临床医生和病例管理人员应考虑通过互联网视频传播有关ACA及其对艾滋病毒护理提供的影响的信息。缺乏互联网和耻辱感是PLWH获得可操作的医疗保健信息的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS Research and Treatment
AIDS Research and Treatment INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focused on all aspects of HIV and AIDS, from the molecular basis of disease to translational and clinical research. In addition, articles relating to prevention, education, and behavior change will be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信