Adherence to National Consensus Guidelines and Association with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Candidemia.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2021-06-07 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786337211018722
Shauna Jacobson Junco, Sarah Chehab, Amanda Giancarelli, Mary Catherine Bowman, R Brigg Turner
{"title":"Adherence to National Consensus Guidelines and Association with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Candidemia.","authors":"Shauna Jacobson Junco,&nbsp;Sarah Chehab,&nbsp;Amanda Giancarelli,&nbsp;Mary Catherine Bowman,&nbsp;R Brigg Turner","doi":"10.1177/11786337211018722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National consensus guidelines outline recommendations for best practices in treating patients with candidemia. This study evaluated the impact of receiving care adherent to the best practice recommendations on clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with candidemia from 2010 to 2015 at 9 hospitals. The primary outcome was the composite of 30-day in-hospital mortality and 90-day candidemia recurrence. Outcomes were compared between those receiving and not receiving care adherent to the guideline recommendations. Inverse probability weights with regression adjustment were utilized to determine the average treatment effect of adherent care on the composite outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>295 patients were included with 14.2% meeting criteria for the composite outcome (11.9% mortality and 2.4% recurrence). The average treatment effect of adherent care was not significant (<i>P</i> = .75). However, receiving appropriate initial antifungal treatment and central venous catheter removal were both associated with the composite (average treatment effect of -17.5%, <i>P</i> = .011 and -8.8%, <i>P</i> = .013, respectively). In patients with a source of infection other than the central line, central venous catheter removal was not associated with the composite (<i>P</i> = .95). The most common reason for failure to receive appropriate initial antifungal treatment was omission of the loading dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Central venous catheter removal and appropriate initial antifungal treatment were associated with a lower incidence of the composite of mortality and recurrence. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy following candidemia clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"14 ","pages":"11786337211018722"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/11786337211018722","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786337211018722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: National consensus guidelines outline recommendations for best practices in treating patients with candidemia. This study evaluated the impact of receiving care adherent to the best practice recommendations on clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with candidemia from 2010 to 2015 at 9 hospitals. The primary outcome was the composite of 30-day in-hospital mortality and 90-day candidemia recurrence. Outcomes were compared between those receiving and not receiving care adherent to the guideline recommendations. Inverse probability weights with regression adjustment were utilized to determine the average treatment effect of adherent care on the composite outcome.

Results: 295 patients were included with 14.2% meeting criteria for the composite outcome (11.9% mortality and 2.4% recurrence). The average treatment effect of adherent care was not significant (P = .75). However, receiving appropriate initial antifungal treatment and central venous catheter removal were both associated with the composite (average treatment effect of -17.5%, P = .011 and -8.8%, P = .013, respectively). In patients with a source of infection other than the central line, central venous catheter removal was not associated with the composite (P = .95). The most common reason for failure to receive appropriate initial antifungal treatment was omission of the loading dose.

Conclusions: Central venous catheter removal and appropriate initial antifungal treatment were associated with a lower incidence of the composite of mortality and recurrence. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy following candidemia clearance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

念珠菌病患者遵守国家共识指南与临床结果的关系
背景:国家共识指南概述了治疗念珠菌患者的最佳实践建议。本研究评估了按照最佳实践建议接受护理对念珠菌病患者临床结果的影响。方法:这项回顾性、多中心研究纳入了2010年至2015年9家医院的念珠菌病患者。主要终点为30天住院死亡率和90天念珠菌复发率。比较了接受和未接受遵循指南建议的护理的患者之间的结果。采用回归调整后的逆概率权重来确定坚持治疗对综合结果的平均治疗效果。结果:纳入295例患者,14.2%符合综合结局标准(死亡率11.9%,复发率2.4%)。粘附治疗的平均治疗效果无统计学意义(P = 0.75)。然而,接受适当的初始抗真菌治疗和中心静脉导管拔除均与复合(平均治疗效果为-17.5%,P =。011和-8.8%,P =。013年,分别)。在感染源非中央静脉导管的患者中,中心静脉导管拔除与复合因素无关(P = 0.95)。未能接受适当的初始抗真菌治疗的最常见原因是遗漏负荷剂量。结论:中心静脉导管拔除和适当的初始抗真菌治疗与较低的死亡率和复发率相关。需要进一步的研究来确定念珠菌清除后的最佳治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信