Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.

Medical care research and review : MCRR Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-22 DOI:10.1177/10775587211027372
Hope C Norris, Haley M Richardson, Marie-Anais C Benoit, Beth Shrosbree, Judith E Smith, A Mark Fendrick
{"title":"Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.","authors":"Hope C Norris,&nbsp;Haley M Richardson,&nbsp;Marie-Anais C Benoit,&nbsp;Beth Shrosbree,&nbsp;Judith E Smith,&nbsp;A Mark Fendrick","doi":"10.1177/10775587211027372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer cost-sharing has been shown to diminish utilization of preventive services. Recent efforts, including provisions within the Affordable Care Act, have sought to increase use of preventive care through elimination of cost-sharing for clinically indicated services. We conducted a rapid review of the literature to determine the impact of cost-share elimination on utilization of preventive services. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Complete databases as well as in grey literature. A total of 35 articles were included in qualitative synthesis and findings were summarized for three clinical service categories: cancer screenings, contraceptives, and additional services. Impacts of cost-sharing elimination varied depending on clinical service, with a majority of findings showing increases in use. Studies that included socioeconomic status reported that those who were financially vulnerable incurred substantial increases in utilization. Future investigations on additional clinical services are warranted as is research to better elucidate populations who most benefit from cost-sharing elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":" ","pages":"175-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10775587211027372","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587211027372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Consumer cost-sharing has been shown to diminish utilization of preventive services. Recent efforts, including provisions within the Affordable Care Act, have sought to increase use of preventive care through elimination of cost-sharing for clinically indicated services. We conducted a rapid review of the literature to determine the impact of cost-share elimination on utilization of preventive services. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Complete databases as well as in grey literature. A total of 35 articles were included in qualitative synthesis and findings were summarized for three clinical service categories: cancer screenings, contraceptives, and additional services. Impacts of cost-sharing elimination varied depending on clinical service, with a majority of findings showing increases in use. Studies that included socioeconomic status reported that those who were financially vulnerable incurred substantial increases in utilization. Future investigations on additional clinical services are warranted as is research to better elucidate populations who most benefit from cost-sharing elimination.

取消费用分担对预防保健服务的利用影响:快速回顾。
消费者分担费用已显示减少了对预防性服务的利用。最近的努力,包括《负担得起的医疗法案》中的规定,力求通过取消临床指征服务的费用分摊来增加预防性护理的使用。我们对文献进行了快速回顾,以确定取消费用分担对预防服务利用的影响。在PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL Complete数据库以及灰色文献中进行检索。定性综合共纳入了35篇文章,并总结了三个临床服务类别的研究结果:癌症筛查、避孕药具和其他服务。取消费用分摊的影响因临床服务而异,大多数调查结果显示使用有所增加。包括社会经济地位在内的研究报告说,那些经济上脆弱的人的使用率大幅增加。未来对额外临床服务的调查是必要的,研究是为了更好地阐明谁最受益于费用分摊的消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信