Intra-individual Associations of Perceived Stress, Affective Valence, and Affective Arousal with Momentary Cortisol in a Sample of Working Adults.

Jillian A Johnson, Matthew J Zawadzki, Dusti R Jones, Julia Reichenberger, Joshua M Smyth
{"title":"Intra-individual Associations of Perceived Stress, Affective Valence, and Affective Arousal with Momentary Cortisol in a Sample of Working Adults.","authors":"Jillian A Johnson,&nbsp;Matthew J Zawadzki,&nbsp;Dusti R Jones,&nbsp;Julia Reichenberger,&nbsp;Joshua M Smyth","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaab049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research pairing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology and ambulatory cortisol during daily life is still rare, as is careful testing of the within-person associations between stress, affect, and cortisol. Using a circumplex approach, we considered both valence and arousal components of affect.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the within-person covariation of momentary cortisol with momentary perceived stress, affective valence, and affective arousal in everyday life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>115 working adults (Mage = 41.2; 76% women; 76% white) completed six EMA surveys per day over 3 days. Each assessment included reports of perceived stress and affect (used to construct indicators of affective valence and arousal), followed by a saliva sample (from which cortisol was assessed). Multi-level models were used to examine the momentary associations between perceived stress, affective valence, affective arousal, and cortisol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moments characterized by higher perceived stress were associated with higher cortisol (p = .036). Affective valence covaried with cortisol (p = .003) such that more positive valence was associated with lower cortisol and more negative valence with higher cortisol. Momentary affective arousal was not related to cortisol (p = .131). When all predictors were tested in the same model, only valence remained a significant predictor of cortisol (p = .047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Momentary perceived stress and affective valence, but not affective arousal, were associated with naturalistic cortisol. Cortisol was more robustly associated with affective valence than perceived stress or affective arousal. These findings extend our understanding of how moments of stress and particular characteristics of affective states (i.e., valence but not arousal) may \"get under the skin\" in daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":520558,"journal":{"name":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"305-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Research pairing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology and ambulatory cortisol during daily life is still rare, as is careful testing of the within-person associations between stress, affect, and cortisol. Using a circumplex approach, we considered both valence and arousal components of affect.

Purpose: To examine the within-person covariation of momentary cortisol with momentary perceived stress, affective valence, and affective arousal in everyday life.

Methods: 115 working adults (Mage = 41.2; 76% women; 76% white) completed six EMA surveys per day over 3 days. Each assessment included reports of perceived stress and affect (used to construct indicators of affective valence and arousal), followed by a saliva sample (from which cortisol was assessed). Multi-level models were used to examine the momentary associations between perceived stress, affective valence, affective arousal, and cortisol.

Results: Moments characterized by higher perceived stress were associated with higher cortisol (p = .036). Affective valence covaried with cortisol (p = .003) such that more positive valence was associated with lower cortisol and more negative valence with higher cortisol. Momentary affective arousal was not related to cortisol (p = .131). When all predictors were tested in the same model, only valence remained a significant predictor of cortisol (p = .047).

Conclusion: Momentary perceived stress and affective valence, but not affective arousal, were associated with naturalistic cortisol. Cortisol was more robustly associated with affective valence than perceived stress or affective arousal. These findings extend our understanding of how moments of stress and particular characteristics of affective states (i.e., valence but not arousal) may "get under the skin" in daily life.

在一个工作成年人样本中,感知压力、情感效价和情感唤醒与瞬时皮质醇的个体内关联。
背景:将生态瞬时评估(EMA)方法与日常生活中的动态皮质醇相结合的研究仍然很少,对压力、情绪和皮质醇之间的人际关系的仔细测试也很少见。使用一种复杂的方法,我们考虑了情感的效价和唤醒成分。目的:探讨日常生活中瞬时皮质醇与瞬时感知应激、情感效价和情感觉醒的共变。方法:115名在职成人(年龄= 41.2;76%的女性;76%的白人)在3天内每天完成6次EMA调查。每次评估都包括感知压力和情感的报告(用于构建情感效价和觉醒的指标),然后是唾液样本(从中评估皮质醇)。多层次模型被用来检验感知压力、情感效价、情感唤醒和皮质醇之间的瞬间关联。结果:高感知压力时刻与高皮质醇相关(p = 0.036)。情感效价与皮质醇共变(p = 0.003),因此更多的积极效价与较低的皮质醇相关,而更多的消极效价与较高的皮质醇相关。瞬时情感唤醒与皮质醇无关(p = 0.131)。当所有预测因子在同一模型中进行测试时,只有效价仍然是皮质醇的显著预测因子(p = 0.047)。结论:瞬时感知应激和情感效价与自然皮质醇相关,而情感唤醒与自然皮质醇无关。皮质醇与情感效价的关系比感知到的压力或情感唤醒更为密切。这些发现扩展了我们对日常生活中压力时刻和情感状态的特定特征(即效价而非唤醒)如何“深入人心”的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信