Applying the RISE Model of Resilience in Partners Post-Stroke: A Qualitative Analysis.

Miranda A Anderson, Corinne Buffo, Dana Ketcher, Hop Nguyen, Justin J MacKenzie, Maija Reblin, Alexandra L Terrill
{"title":"Applying the RISE Model of Resilience in Partners Post-Stroke: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Miranda A Anderson,&nbsp;Corinne Buffo,&nbsp;Dana Ketcher,&nbsp;Hop Nguyen,&nbsp;Justin J MacKenzie,&nbsp;Maija Reblin,&nbsp;Alexandra L Terrill","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaab053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resilience is dynamic and influenced by internal and external factors. In persons with chronic illness and/or disability, resilience is viewed as the ability to adapt to new life circumstances. Existing models of resilience typically focus on the absence of deficit and pathology in the individual, overlooking resources, well-being, and broader social impacts. Our proposed novel Relational, Intrapersonal, Social and Environmental (RISE) Model of resilience incorporates and describes the interconnection and influence of constructs that impact resilience and affect the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine the fit of the RISE Model against original interview data obtained from persons with stroke and their partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from post-intervention interviews that were part of an intervention pilot study designed to promote resilience in couples coping with stroke. Interviews were coded to examine relationships between RISE Model constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 36 interviews from 18 cohabitating couples; mean participant age was 53.33 years (SD ±14.70). Examples of each construct within the RISE Model appeared in transcribed interviews and common patterns of co-occurring constructs were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The constructs within the RISE Model were supported by the interviews. The impact of disability does not remain confined to a single individual and instead branches out into the broader social context, including close interpersonal relationships. A deeper understanding of resilience and its relationship with intrapersonal, interpersonal and socio-ecological constructs would add value to our understanding and fostering of resilience in persons with disabilities and/or chronic illness.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>NCT03335358.</p>","PeriodicalId":520558,"journal":{"name":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887576/pdf/kaab053.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Resilience is dynamic and influenced by internal and external factors. In persons with chronic illness and/or disability, resilience is viewed as the ability to adapt to new life circumstances. Existing models of resilience typically focus on the absence of deficit and pathology in the individual, overlooking resources, well-being, and broader social impacts. Our proposed novel Relational, Intrapersonal, Social and Environmental (RISE) Model of resilience incorporates and describes the interconnection and influence of constructs that impact resilience and affect the quality of life.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the fit of the RISE Model against original interview data obtained from persons with stroke and their partners.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from post-intervention interviews that were part of an intervention pilot study designed to promote resilience in couples coping with stroke. Interviews were coded to examine relationships between RISE Model constructs.

Results: The study included 36 interviews from 18 cohabitating couples; mean participant age was 53.33 years (SD ±14.70). Examples of each construct within the RISE Model appeared in transcribed interviews and common patterns of co-occurring constructs were identified.

Conclusion: The constructs within the RISE Model were supported by the interviews. The impact of disability does not remain confined to a single individual and instead branches out into the broader social context, including close interpersonal relationships. A deeper understanding of resilience and its relationship with intrapersonal, interpersonal and socio-ecological constructs would add value to our understanding and fostering of resilience in persons with disabilities and/or chronic illness.

Clinical trial information: NCT03335358.

运用RISE模型在合作伙伴中风后恢复力:定性分析。
背景:弹性是动态的,受内外因素的影响。对于患有慢性疾病和/或残疾的人,复原力被视为适应新生活环境的能力。现有的复原力模型通常关注个体缺乏缺陷和病理,忽视了资源、福祉和更广泛的社会影响。我们提出的新的关系、个人、社会和环境(RISE)弹性模型整合并描述了影响弹性和影响生活质量的结构的相互联系和影响。目的:本研究的目的是检验RISE模型与中风患者及其伴侣原始访谈数据的拟合性。方法:本研究是对干预后访谈收集的定性数据的二次分析,这些访谈是干预试点研究的一部分,旨在提高夫妇应对中风的弹性。访谈被编码以检查RISE模型构造之间的关系。结果:共对18对同居伴侣进行了36次访谈;平均年龄53.33岁(SD±14.70)。RISE模型中每个构念的例子出现在转录的访谈中,并确定了共同发生构念的常见模式。结论:RISE模型的结构得到了访谈的支持。残疾的影响并不局限于个人,而是延伸到更广泛的社会背景,包括密切的人际关系。更深入地了解复原力及其与内省、人际关系和社会生态结构的关系,将有助于我们理解和培养残疾人和/或慢性病患者的复原力。临床试验信息:NCT03335358。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信