Effects of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation on Swallow Timings, Clearance and Safety in Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Analysis from the Swallowing Treatment Using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation (STEPS) Trial.

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2021-06-07 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5520657
Lisa F Everton, Jacqueline K Benfield, Emilia Michou, Shaheen Hamdy, Philip M Bath
{"title":"Effects of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation on Swallow Timings, Clearance and Safety in Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Analysis from the Swallowing Treatment Using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation (STEPS) Trial.","authors":"Lisa F Everton,&nbsp;Jacqueline K Benfield,&nbsp;Emilia Michou,&nbsp;Shaheen Hamdy,&nbsp;Philip M Bath","doi":"10.1155/2021/5520657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Swallowing impairment (dysphagia) post-stroke results in poorer outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) is a potential treatment for post-stroke dysphagia. In a post hoc analysis, we investigated PES using videofluoroscopy swallow studies (VFSS) from the STEPS trial incorporating multiple measures of safety (penetration aspiration scale-PAS), speed and duration (timing), and efficiency (clearance), as opposed to the original trial which only measured PAS scores. 81 randomised participants (PES (<i>N</i> = 43) versus sham (<i>N</i> = 38)) were analysed at baseline and 2 weeks. Participants swallowed up to 6 × 5 ml and 1 × 50 ml of thin liquid barium at 40% <i>w</i>/<i>v</i>, images at ≥25 fps. Based on PAS, the 5 ml mode bolus (most frequently occurring PAS from 6 × 5 ml) and the worst 50 ml bolus were chosen for further analysis. Eight timing measures were performed, including stage transition duration (STD) and pharyngeal transit time (PTT). Clearance measures comprised oral and pharyngeal residue and swallows to clear. Comparisons of change of scoring outcomes between PES and sham were done at 2 weeks. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was also used to evaluate longitudinal changes from both groups' combined results at two weeks. Between-group analysis showed no statistically significant differences. Issues with suboptimal image quality and frame rate acquisition affected final numbers. At two weeks, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in most safety scores (PAS) and STD, possibly due to spontaneous recovery or a combination of spontaneous recovery and swallowing treatment and usual care. A nonsignificant trend for improvement was seen in other timing measures, including PTT. This study, which conducted additional measurements of kinematic and residue analysis on the STEPS data did not detect \"missed\" improvements in swallowing function that the PAS is not designed to measure. However, more studies with greater numbers are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205591/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5520657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Swallowing impairment (dysphagia) post-stroke results in poorer outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) is a potential treatment for post-stroke dysphagia. In a post hoc analysis, we investigated PES using videofluoroscopy swallow studies (VFSS) from the STEPS trial incorporating multiple measures of safety (penetration aspiration scale-PAS), speed and duration (timing), and efficiency (clearance), as opposed to the original trial which only measured PAS scores. 81 randomised participants (PES (N = 43) versus sham (N = 38)) were analysed at baseline and 2 weeks. Participants swallowed up to 6 × 5 ml and 1 × 50 ml of thin liquid barium at 40% w/v, images at ≥25 fps. Based on PAS, the 5 ml mode bolus (most frequently occurring PAS from 6 × 5 ml) and the worst 50 ml bolus were chosen for further analysis. Eight timing measures were performed, including stage transition duration (STD) and pharyngeal transit time (PTT). Clearance measures comprised oral and pharyngeal residue and swallows to clear. Comparisons of change of scoring outcomes between PES and sham were done at 2 weeks. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was also used to evaluate longitudinal changes from both groups' combined results at two weeks. Between-group analysis showed no statistically significant differences. Issues with suboptimal image quality and frame rate acquisition affected final numbers. At two weeks, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in most safety scores (PAS) and STD, possibly due to spontaneous recovery or a combination of spontaneous recovery and swallowing treatment and usual care. A nonsignificant trend for improvement was seen in other timing measures, including PTT. This study, which conducted additional measurements of kinematic and residue analysis on the STEPS data did not detect "missed" improvements in swallowing function that the PAS is not designed to measure. However, more studies with greater numbers are required.

咽部电刺激对脑卒中后吞咽困难患者吞咽时机、清除和安全性的影响:咽电刺激吞咽治疗(STEPS)试验分析
卒中后吞咽障碍(吞咽困难)导致预后较差。咽电刺激(PES)是卒中后吞咽困难的一种潜在治疗方法。在事后分析中,我们使用来自STEPS试验的视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)来调查PES,该试验结合了多种安全性措施(穿透吸入量表-PAS)、速度和持续时间(时间)以及效率(清除),而原始试验仅测量PAS评分。81名随机参与者(PES (N = 43) vs sham (N = 38))在基线和2周时进行分析。参与者在40% w/v下吞下6 × 5ml和1 × 50ml的薄液体钡,图像速度≥25fps。根据PAS,选择5 ml模式剂量(6 × 5 ml中最常见的PAS)和最差的50 ml剂量进行进一步分析。进行了8项计时测量,包括阶段过渡时间(STD)和咽部过境时间(PTT)。清除措施包括口服和咽部残留和吞咽清除。在第2周比较PES和sham评分结果的变化。还使用Wilcoxon sign rank检验来评估两组在两周时综合结果的纵向变化。组间分析差异无统计学意义。次优图像质量和帧率采集的问题影响了最终数字。两周后,两组患者在大多数安全评分(PAS)和性病方面均有显著改善,这可能是由于自发恢复或自发恢复与吞咽治疗和常规护理相结合。在包括PTT在内的其他计时措施中,改善趋势不显著。这项研究对STEPS数据进行了额外的运动学测量和残留分析,并没有检测到PAS没有设计用于测量的吞咽功能的“遗漏”改善。然而,需要更多的研究和更大的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信