Migration and mobility of third-country national labour workers to and inside Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic - a legal analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1186/s40878-021-00229-1
Adolfo Sommarribas, Birte Nienaber
{"title":"Migration and mobility of third-country national labour workers to and inside Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic - a legal analysis.","authors":"Adolfo Sommarribas,&nbsp;Birte Nienaber","doi":"10.1186/s40878-021-00229-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic took most EU Member States of the European Union by surprise, as they underestimated the rapid spread of the contagion across the continent. The response of the EU Member States was asymmetrical, individualistic and significantly slow. The first measures taken were to close down the internal borders. The response of the European Union was even slower, and it was not until 17th March 2020 that the external borders were closed. These actions affected legal migration into the European Union from four perspectives: it affected 1) the mobility of those third-country nationals who were on a temporary stay in the EU Member States; 2) the entry of third-country nationals to do seasonal work; 3) legal migrants entering and staying; and 4) the status of the third-country nationals already residing in the EU Member States, especially those experiencing a loss of income. This article will deal with the measures taken by the EU Member States to manage the immigration services, as a case study how Luxembourg dealt to avoid that temporary staying migrants and regular migrants fall into irregularity. Finally, we will focus on the vulnerability of third-country nationals with the rising risk of unemployment and the risk of being returned to their country of origin. The article will also analyse access to healthcare and unemployment benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40878-021-00229-1","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00229-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic took most EU Member States of the European Union by surprise, as they underestimated the rapid spread of the contagion across the continent. The response of the EU Member States was asymmetrical, individualistic and significantly slow. The first measures taken were to close down the internal borders. The response of the European Union was even slower, and it was not until 17th March 2020 that the external borders were closed. These actions affected legal migration into the European Union from four perspectives: it affected 1) the mobility of those third-country nationals who were on a temporary stay in the EU Member States; 2) the entry of third-country nationals to do seasonal work; 3) legal migrants entering and staying; and 4) the status of the third-country nationals already residing in the EU Member States, especially those experiencing a loss of income. This article will deal with the measures taken by the EU Member States to manage the immigration services, as a case study how Luxembourg dealt to avoid that temporary staying migrants and regular migrants fall into irregularity. Finally, we will focus on the vulnerability of third-country nationals with the rising risk of unemployment and the risk of being returned to their country of origin. The article will also analyse access to healthcare and unemployment benefits.

Covid-19大流行期间第三国本国劳工前往欧洲和在欧洲内部的迁移和流动——法律分析。
2019冠状病毒病大流行令大多数欧盟成员国感到意外,因为它们低估了疫情在整个欧洲大陆的迅速蔓延。欧盟成员国的反应是不对称的、个人主义的和相当缓慢的。首先采取的措施是关闭内部边界。欧盟的反应更慢,直到2020年3月17日才关闭了外部边界。这些行动从四个方面影响了进入欧盟的合法移民:它影响了1)在欧盟成员国临时停留的第三国国民的流动性;2)第三国公民入境从事季节性工作;(三)合法移民入境停留;4)已经居住在欧盟成员国的第三国国民的地位,特别是那些经历收入损失的国民。本文将讨论欧盟成员国为管理移民服务所采取的措施,作为一个案例研究卢森堡如何处理以避免临时停留移民和正式移民陷入不正常状态。最后,我们将重点关注第三国国民的脆弱性,他们失业的风险和被送回原籍国的风险正在上升。本文还将分析获得医疗保健和失业救济金的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信