A retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation in patients undergoing surgery for osteomyelitis in England: a case for reorganising orthopaedic infection services.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2021-04-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-6-151-2021
Jamie Ferguson, Myriam Alexander, Stuart Bruce, Matthew O'Connell, Sue Beecroft, Martin McNally
{"title":"A retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation in patients undergoing surgery for osteomyelitis in England: a case for reorganising orthopaedic infection services.","authors":"Jamie Ferguson,&nbsp;Myriam Alexander,&nbsp;Stuart Bruce,&nbsp;Matthew O'Connell,&nbsp;Sue Beecroft,&nbsp;Martin McNally","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-151-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims</b>: An investigation of the impact of a multidisciplinary bone infection unit (BIU) undertaking osteomyelitis surgery with a single-stage protocol on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation compared to national outcomes in England. <b>Patients and Methods</b>: A tertiary referral multidisciplinary BIU was compared to the rest of England (ROE) and a subset of the 10 next busiest centres based on osteomyelitis treatment episode volume (Top Ten), using the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES). A total of 25 006 patients undergoing osteomyelitis surgery between April 2013 and March 2017 were included. Data on secondary healthcare resource utilisation and clinical indicators were extracted for 24 months before and after surgery. <b>Results</b>: Patients treated at the BIU had higher orthopaedic healthcare utilisation in the 2 years prior to their index procedure, with more admissions ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001) and a mean length of stay (LOS) over 4 times longer than other groups (10.99 d, compared to 2.79 d for Top Ten and 2.46 d for the ROE, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001). During the index inpatient period, the BIU had fewer mean theatre visits (1.25) compared to the TT (1.98, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001) and the ROE (1.64, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001). The index inpatient period was shorter in the BIU (11.84 d), 33.6 % less than the Top Ten (17.83 d, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001) and 29.9 % shorter than the ROE (16.88 d, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001). During follow-up, BIU patients underwent fewer osteomyelitis-related reoperations than Top Ten centres ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo></mrow> </math>  0.0139) and the ROE ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo></mrow> </math>  0.0137). Mortality was lower (4.71 %) compared to the Top Ten (20.06 %, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001) and the ROE (22.63 %, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001). The cumulative BIU total amputation rate was lower (6.47 %) compared to the Top Ten (15.96 %, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001) and the ROE (12.71 %, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo></mrow> </math>  0.001). Overall healthcare utilisation was lower in the BIU for all inpatient admissions, LOS, and Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances. <b>Conclusion</b>: The benefits of managing osteomyelitis in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) specialist setting included reduced hospital stays, lower reoperation rates for infection recurrence, improved survival, lower amputation rates, and lower overall healthcare utilisation. These results support the establishment of centrally funded multidisciplinary bone infection units that will improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 5","pages":"151-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137857/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-151-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aims: An investigation of the impact of a multidisciplinary bone infection unit (BIU) undertaking osteomyelitis surgery with a single-stage protocol on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation compared to national outcomes in England. Patients and Methods: A tertiary referral multidisciplinary BIU was compared to the rest of England (ROE) and a subset of the 10 next busiest centres based on osteomyelitis treatment episode volume (Top Ten), using the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES). A total of 25 006 patients undergoing osteomyelitis surgery between April 2013 and March 2017 were included. Data on secondary healthcare resource utilisation and clinical indicators were extracted for 24 months before and after surgery. Results: Patients treated at the BIU had higher orthopaedic healthcare utilisation in the 2 years prior to their index procedure, with more admissions ( p <  0.001) and a mean length of stay (LOS) over 4 times longer than other groups (10.99 d, compared to 2.79 d for Top Ten and 2.46 d for the ROE, p <  0.001). During the index inpatient period, the BIU had fewer mean theatre visits (1.25) compared to the TT (1.98, p <  0.001) and the ROE (1.64, p =  0.001). The index inpatient period was shorter in the BIU (11.84 d), 33.6 % less than the Top Ten (17.83 d, p <  0.001) and 29.9 % shorter than the ROE (16.88 d, p <  0.001). During follow-up, BIU patients underwent fewer osteomyelitis-related reoperations than Top Ten centres ( p =  0.0139) and the ROE ( p =  0.0137). Mortality was lower (4.71 %) compared to the Top Ten (20.06 %, p <  0.001) and the ROE (22.63 %, p <  0.001). The cumulative BIU total amputation rate was lower (6.47 %) compared to the Top Ten (15.96 %, p <  0.001) and the ROE (12.71 %, p <  0.001). Overall healthcare utilisation was lower in the BIU for all inpatient admissions, LOS, and Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances. Conclusion: The benefits of managing osteomyelitis in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) specialist setting included reduced hospital stays, lower reoperation rates for infection recurrence, improved survival, lower amputation rates, and lower overall healthcare utilisation. These results support the establishment of centrally funded multidisciplinary bone infection units that will improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare utilisation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项回顾性队列研究比较临床结果和医疗保健资源利用的患者接受骨髓炎手术在英格兰:一个案例重组骨科感染服务。
目的:调查多学科骨感染单位(BIU)进行骨髓炎手术的单阶段方案对临床结果和医疗保健利用的影响,并将其与英格兰的国家结果进行比较。患者和方法:使用医院事件统计数据库(HES),将三级转诊多学科BIU与英格兰其他地区(ROE)和基于骨髓炎治疗事件量(前十名)的下一个最繁忙的10个中心的子集进行比较。共纳入2013年4月至2017年3月期间接受骨髓炎手术的25例 006例患者。提取手术前后24个月的二级医疗资源利用和临床指标数据。结果:在BIU接受治疗的患者在其指标手术前2年内有更高的骨科医疗利用率,入院次数更多(p 0.001),平均住院时间(LOS)比其他组长4倍以上(10.99 d,前10名为2.79 d, ROE为2.46 d, p 0.001)。在指数住院期间,与TT (1.98, p 0.001)和ROE (1.64, p = 0.001)相比,BIU的平均住院次数(1.25)较少。BIU的指标住院时间短于前10名(11.84 d),比前10名(17.83 d, p 0.001)短33.6 %,比ROE短29.9 %(16.88 d, p 0.001)。在随访期间,BIU患者发生与骨髓炎相关的再手术的次数少于排名前十的中心(p = 0.0139)和ROE (p = 0.0137)。死亡率(4.71 %)低于前10名(20.06 %,p 0.001)和净资产收益率(22.63 %,p 0.001)。累积BIU全截肢率(6.47 %)低于前十组(15.96 %,p 0.001)和ROE(12.71 %,p 0.001)。BIU中所有住院病人、LOS和急诊(A&E)出勤的总体医疗保健利用率较低。结论:在多学科团队(MDT)专家环境中管理骨髓炎的好处包括缩短住院时间、降低感染复发的再手术率、提高生存率、降低截肢率和降低整体医疗保健利用率。这些结果支持建立中央资助的多学科骨感染单位,这将改善患者的预后并减少医疗保健利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信