Comparison of Lidocaine Spray and Lidocaine Ice Popsicle in Patients Undergoing Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"Comparison of Lidocaine Spray and Lidocaine Ice Popsicle in Patients Undergoing Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Prasit Mahawongkajit, Nantawat Talalak, Neranchala Soonthornkes","doi":"10.2147/CEG.S301163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) under topical pharyngeal anesthesia has the advantage of avoiding the unwanted cardiopulmonary adverse events experienced following intravenous sedation. Lidocaine spray is a common anesthetic option and is safe for unsedated EGD. Although several studies have compared different topical anesthetic agents, their formulations, and delivery techniques, questions still remain concerning the optimal mode of administration. We have designed a lidocaine formulation in the form of an ice popsicle and compared its effectiveness and tolerability with lidocaine spray in patients undergoing unsedated EGD. Methods This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Unsedated EGD patients were randomly allocated the lidocaine spray [Group (Gp) A] or lidocaine ice popsicle (Gp B) formulation. Results In total, 204 unsedated EGD patients were evaluated. Compared to the spray, the lidocaine ice popsicle group showed better scores for effects in terms of endoscopist satisfaction (Gp A, 7.28±1.44; Gp B, 7.8±0.89; p=0.0022), gag reflex (Gp A, 1.3±0.66; Gp B, 1.02±0.61; p=0.0016), patient satisfaction (Gp A, 7.74±0.82; Gp B, 8.08±0.82; p=0.0039), discomfort (Gp A, 6.54±1.34; Gp B, 5.95±1.21; p=0.0012), and pain (Gp A, 5.38±1.85; Gp B, 4.51±2.01; p=0.0015). Conclusion Both the lidocaine spray and ice popsicle formulations are safe, effective options for diagnostic EGD with the ice popsicle exhibiting better performance. We propose the lidocaine ice popsicle formulation for topical pharyngeal anesthesia in patients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD and suggest it may be a suitable option during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Trial Register Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) number TCTR20190502001.","PeriodicalId":10208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","volume":"14 ","pages":"209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/1d/ceg-14-209.PMC8164666.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S301163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) under topical pharyngeal anesthesia has the advantage of avoiding the unwanted cardiopulmonary adverse events experienced following intravenous sedation. Lidocaine spray is a common anesthetic option and is safe for unsedated EGD. Although several studies have compared different topical anesthetic agents, their formulations, and delivery techniques, questions still remain concerning the optimal mode of administration. We have designed a lidocaine formulation in the form of an ice popsicle and compared its effectiveness and tolerability with lidocaine spray in patients undergoing unsedated EGD. Methods This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Unsedated EGD patients were randomly allocated the lidocaine spray [Group (Gp) A] or lidocaine ice popsicle (Gp B) formulation. Results In total, 204 unsedated EGD patients were evaluated. Compared to the spray, the lidocaine ice popsicle group showed better scores for effects in terms of endoscopist satisfaction (Gp A, 7.28±1.44; Gp B, 7.8±0.89; p=0.0022), gag reflex (Gp A, 1.3±0.66; Gp B, 1.02±0.61; p=0.0016), patient satisfaction (Gp A, 7.74±0.82; Gp B, 8.08±0.82; p=0.0039), discomfort (Gp A, 6.54±1.34; Gp B, 5.95±1.21; p=0.0012), and pain (Gp A, 5.38±1.85; Gp B, 4.51±2.01; p=0.0015). Conclusion Both the lidocaine spray and ice popsicle formulations are safe, effective options for diagnostic EGD with the ice popsicle exhibiting better performance. We propose the lidocaine ice popsicle formulation for topical pharyngeal anesthesia in patients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD and suggest it may be a suitable option during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Trial Register Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) number TCTR20190502001.
目的:局部咽麻醉下食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的优点是避免了静脉镇静后出现的不必要的心肺不良事件。利多卡因喷雾是一种常见的麻醉选择,对未镇静的EGD是安全的。虽然有几项研究比较了不同的表面麻醉剂、它们的配方和给药技术,但关于最佳给药方式的问题仍然存在。我们设计了一种冰棒形式的利多卡因制剂,并将其与利多卡因喷雾剂在非镇静EGD患者中的有效性和耐受性进行了比较。方法:采用单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。未镇静的EGD患者随机分配利多卡因喷雾[组(Gp) A]或利多卡因冰棒(Gp)制剂。结果:共评估了204例未镇静的EGD患者。与喷雾组相比,利多卡因冰棒组在内镜医师满意度方面的效果得分更高(Gp A, 7.28±1.44;Gp B, 7.8±0.89;p=0.0022),呕吐反射(Gp A, 1.3±0.66;Gp B, 1.02±0.61;p=0.0016),患者满意度(Gp A, 7.74±0.82;Gp B, 8.08±0.82;p=0.0039)、不适感(Gp A, 6.54±1.34;Gp B, 5.95±1.21;p=0.0012),疼痛(Gp A, 5.38±1.85;Gp B, 4.51±2.01;p = 0.0015)。结论:利多卡因喷雾剂和冰棒制剂均是诊断EGD安全、有效的选择,冰棒制剂的疗效更好。我们建议利多卡因冰棒配方用于非镇静诊断性EGD患者的局部咽麻醉,并建议它可能是COVID-19大流行期间的合适选择。临床试验注册:泰国临床试验注册中心(TCTR)编号:TCTR20190502001。