Let us ask the patient: psychological well-being from a patients'-perspective due to postponed care of cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 lockdown.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Acta Chirurgica Belgica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2021.1917749
Ashley Welch, Jan Nijs, Ines Van Loo, Marina Mallefroy, Mark La Meir
{"title":"Let us ask the patient: psychological well-being from a patients'-perspective due to postponed care of cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 lockdown.","authors":"Ashley Welch, Jan Nijs, Ines Van Loo, Marina Mallefroy, Mark La Meir","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2021.1917749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced a rapid and extensive change in the need of intensive care beds. Therefore, we decided early in the pandemic to suspend all elective cases of cardiac surgery and closed the ambulatory clinic. The effect of this strategy on the mental well-being of the non-COVID-19 patients is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether planned or operated patients suffered from either anxiety or depression by their altered medical care trajectory and if their score influenced decision-making. The findings intend to anticipate individual needs during subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patient population consisted of two groups. The first group included planned patients whose operation date was delayed; in the second group, the postoperative control visit was postponed. Both groups received a twofold questionnaire. Part one was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, part two a series of questions on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgical care from a patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was composed of 46 patients (63% men). Most of them (82.6%) would like the surgery to be performed as fast as possible, even before the end of the first wave of COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Of all patients 30.4% have avoided to consult a physician because of fear and 34.8% consulted a physician by phone call. When they physically consulted a physician, there was a prominent role for the general practitioner (41.3% went to the GP vs 19.6% to the specialist). Most (58.7%) of the patients would have liked a (tele)consultation with the cardiac surgeon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of the HADS, one can state that a closer follow-up using telemedicine during the pandemic is expected by all patients. All patients prefer their surgery to take place even during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2021.1917749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced a rapid and extensive change in the need of intensive care beds. Therefore, we decided early in the pandemic to suspend all elective cases of cardiac surgery and closed the ambulatory clinic. The effect of this strategy on the mental well-being of the non-COVID-19 patients is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether planned or operated patients suffered from either anxiety or depression by their altered medical care trajectory and if their score influenced decision-making. The findings intend to anticipate individual needs during subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: The patient population consisted of two groups. The first group included planned patients whose operation date was delayed; in the second group, the postoperative control visit was postponed. Both groups received a twofold questionnaire. Part one was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, part two a series of questions on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgical care from a patient's perspective.

Results: The study population was composed of 46 patients (63% men). Most of them (82.6%) would like the surgery to be performed as fast as possible, even before the end of the first wave of COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Of all patients 30.4% have avoided to consult a physician because of fear and 34.8% consulted a physician by phone call. When they physically consulted a physician, there was a prominent role for the general practitioner (41.3% went to the GP vs 19.6% to the specialist). Most (58.7%) of the patients would have liked a (tele)consultation with the cardiac surgeon.

Conclusions: Regardless of the HADS, one can state that a closer follow-up using telemedicine during the pandemic is expected by all patients. All patients prefer their surgery to take place even during a pandemic.

让我们问问病人:从病人的角度看 COVID-19 封锁期间因心脏手术护理推迟而造成的心理健康问题。
前言COVID-19 大流行的爆发迫使重症监护床位的需求发生了迅速而广泛的变化。因此,我们在大流行初期就决定暂停所有心脏外科的择期手术,并关闭了非住院门诊。这一策略对非COVID-19患者心理健康的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估计划内或手术患者是否因其医疗护理轨迹的改变而患上焦虑症或抑郁症,以及他们的得分是否影响了决策。研究结果旨在预测 COVID-19 大流行后续波次中的个人需求:患者群体包括两组。第一组包括手术日期被推迟的计划患者;第二组的术后对照检查时间被推迟。两组患者均接受了两方面的问卷调查。第一部分是 "医院焦虑和抑郁量表",第二部分是从患者角度提出的一系列关于 COVID-19 大流行对心脏外科护理影响的问题:研究对象包括 46 名患者(63% 为男性)。他们中的大多数(82.6%)希望尽快进行手术,甚至在第一波与 COVID-19 相关的住院治疗结束之前。在所有患者中,30.4% 的人因为害怕而没有去看医生,34.8% 的人通过电话咨询了医生。在实际咨询医生时,全科医生的作用非常突出(41.3% 的患者咨询全科医生,19.6% 的患者咨询专科医生)。大多数患者(58.7%)希望与心脏外科医生进行(远程)会诊:结论:无论采用哪种 HADS,所有患者都希望在大流行期间通过远程医疗进行更密切的随访。所有患者都希望即使在大流行期间也能进行手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信