Compromised cognition, but not stepping-down performance, when dual-tasking in stroke survivors.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-31 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2021.1918054
Wing Nga Chan, William Wai Nam Tsang
{"title":"Compromised cognition, but not stepping-down performance, when dual-tasking in stroke survivors.","authors":"Wing Nga Chan, William Wai Nam Tsang","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2021.1918054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Descending stairs is an indicator of independence among stroke survivors, but is demanding in terms of both neuromuscular control and cognitive functioning. Previous studies found a compromised performance when stepping down with a concurrent cognitive task among healthy older adults, but whether stroke survivors react similarly is not known. This cross-sectional study thus investigated how stroke survivors responded to a dual-task that involved stepping down and compared their performance with that of control subjects. Thirty-four healthy individuals and 26 stroke survivors reacted to an auditory Stroop test while stepping off a 19-cm high platform. The auditory Stroop test was evaluated with a composite score (dividing accuracy by averaged reaction time). Stepping down performances were quantified with subjects' sway amplitudes in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions after landing and sway velocities of their center of pressure. Stroke survivors demonstrated significantly lower composite scores when dual-tasking (76.4 ± 31.2) than when single-tasking (90.0 ± 25.6), while no significant change in stepping down performance was observed. Stroke survivors also swayed significantly more and with a higher velocity than controls when dual-tasking. The results suggested that stroke survivors adopted a posture-first strategy to deal with this dual-tasking challenge. This study raised the awareness on dual-tasking ability among stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00222895.2021.1918054","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2021.1918054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Descending stairs is an indicator of independence among stroke survivors, but is demanding in terms of both neuromuscular control and cognitive functioning. Previous studies found a compromised performance when stepping down with a concurrent cognitive task among healthy older adults, but whether stroke survivors react similarly is not known. This cross-sectional study thus investigated how stroke survivors responded to a dual-task that involved stepping down and compared their performance with that of control subjects. Thirty-four healthy individuals and 26 stroke survivors reacted to an auditory Stroop test while stepping off a 19-cm high platform. The auditory Stroop test was evaluated with a composite score (dividing accuracy by averaged reaction time). Stepping down performances were quantified with subjects' sway amplitudes in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions after landing and sway velocities of their center of pressure. Stroke survivors demonstrated significantly lower composite scores when dual-tasking (76.4 ± 31.2) than when single-tasking (90.0 ± 25.6), while no significant change in stepping down performance was observed. Stroke survivors also swayed significantly more and with a higher velocity than controls when dual-tasking. The results suggested that stroke survivors adopted a posture-first strategy to deal with this dual-tasking challenge. This study raised the awareness on dual-tasking ability among stroke survivors.

脑卒中幸存者在执行双重任务时,认知能力受损,但不会降低表现。
下楼梯是中风幸存者独立性的一个指标,但在神经肌肉控制和认知功能方面要求很高。先前的研究发现,在健康的老年人中,当同时完成认知任务时,他们的表现会受到影响,但中风幸存者的反应是否相似尚不清楚。因此,这项横断面研究调查了中风幸存者对涉及下台的双重任务的反应,并将他们的表现与对照受试者的表现进行了比较。34名健康人和26名中风幸存者在离开19厘米高的平台时对听觉Stroop测试做出反应。听觉Stroop测试采用综合评分(准确度除以平均反应时间)进行评估。通过受试者着陆后前后和中外侧方向的摇摆幅度和压力中心的摇摆速度来量化下坠表现。中风幸存者在双重任务时表现出明显较低的综合得分(76.4 ± 31.2)比单任务时(90.0 ± 25.6),而没有观察到降压性能的显著变化。中风幸存者在双重任务处理时也比对照组摆动得更多,速度也更高。研究结果表明,中风幸存者采用了姿势优先的策略来应对这种双重任务挑战。这项研究提高了中风幸存者对双重任务能力的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信