Immediate effect of foam roller on pain and ankle range of motion in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-08 DOI:10.1142/S1013702521500025
Aishwarya R Ranbhor, Ashish J Prabhakar, Charu Eapen
{"title":"Immediate effect of foam roller on pain and ankle range of motion in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Aishwarya R Ranbhor,&nbsp;Ashish J Prabhakar,&nbsp;Charu Eapen","doi":"10.1142/S1013702521500025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching has been proven to be effective on pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients with plantar fasciitis. Despite recent gain in popularity and the proposed theories of effectiveness of foam roller, there is a lack of literature on the effect of foam rolling on plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the effects of foam rolling and stretching on pain and ankle ROM in patients with plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 participants were included and randomly allocated to the stretching and foam roller groups. Visual analog scale (VAS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) for gastrocnemius, soleus and plantar fascia and weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) measurements were recorded at baseline and immediately after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within-group analysis has shown there is a statistically significant difference ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) in all the outcome measures in both foam roller and self-stretching groups. The between-groups analysis showed no statistical significance difference in VAS, plantar fascia PPT and WBLT parameters (with <math><mi>p</mi></math> -values of 0.171, 0.372 and 0.861, respectively); however, significant differences were found in gastrocnemius PPT ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>029</mn></math> ) and soleus PPT ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>013</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was seen that both stretching and foam rolling techniques helped in reducing pain and increasing the ROM. However, the effectiveness of foam roller was superior to stretching in terms of increase in PPTs at gastrocnemius and soleus.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration no: </strong>CTRI/2018/01/011398.</p><p><strong>Name of registry: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI); https://ctri.nic.in.</p>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702521500025","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Stretching has been proven to be effective on pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients with plantar fasciitis. Despite recent gain in popularity and the proposed theories of effectiveness of foam roller, there is a lack of literature on the effect of foam rolling on plantar fasciitis.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of foam rolling and stretching on pain and ankle ROM in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Methods: A total of 50 participants were included and randomly allocated to the stretching and foam roller groups. Visual analog scale (VAS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) for gastrocnemius, soleus and plantar fascia and weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) measurements were recorded at baseline and immediately after treatment.

Results: Within-group analysis has shown there is a statistically significant difference ( p < 0 . 001 ) in all the outcome measures in both foam roller and self-stretching groups. The between-groups analysis showed no statistical significance difference in VAS, plantar fascia PPT and WBLT parameters (with p -values of 0.171, 0.372 and 0.861, respectively); however, significant differences were found in gastrocnemius PPT ( p = 0 . 029 ) and soleus PPT ( p = 0 . 013 ).

Conclusion: It was seen that both stretching and foam rolling techniques helped in reducing pain and increasing the ROM. However, the effectiveness of foam roller was superior to stretching in terms of increase in PPTs at gastrocnemius and soleus.

Clinical trial registration no: CTRI/2018/01/011398.

Name of registry: The Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI); https://ctri.nic.in.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泡沫滚轮对足底筋膜炎患者疼痛和踝关节活动范围的直接影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:拉伸已被证明对足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛和活动范围(ROM)有效。尽管最近的流行和提出的理论泡沫滚轮的有效性,有缺乏文献泡沫滚轮对足底筋膜炎的影响。目的:本研究的目的是比较泡沫滚动和拉伸对足底筋膜炎患者疼痛和踝关节活动度的影响。方法:50名受试者随机分为拉伸组和泡沫滚筒组。在基线和治疗后立即记录腓肠肌、比目鱼肌和足底筋膜的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、压痛阈值(PPTs)和负重弓步试验(WBLT)测量。结果:组内分析差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。001)在泡沫滚轮组和自我拉伸组的所有结果测量中。组间分析显示,VAS、足底筋膜PPT、WBLT参数差异无统计学意义(p值分别为0.171、0.372、0.861);但腓肠肌PPT差异有统计学意义(p = 0。029)和比目鱼PPT (p = 0。013)。结论:拉伸和泡沫滚动技术均有助于减轻疼痛和增加关节活动度。但在腓肠肌和比目鱼肌PPTs的增加方面,泡沫滚动技术的效果优于拉伸技术。临床试验注册号:CTRI/2018/01/011398。注册中心名称:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI);https://ctri.nic.in。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信