Correlation of Oxygenation and Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) Score to Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2021-05-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.29390/cjrt-2020-063
Pratibha Todur, N Srikant, Prabha Prakash
{"title":"Correlation of Oxygenation and Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) Score to Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Pratibha Todur,&nbsp;N Srikant,&nbsp;Prabha Prakash","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2020-063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung ultrasound score (LUS) as well as radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score as calculated from chest radiography (CXR) have been applied to assess Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) severity. CXRs, which are frequently performed in ARDS patients, pose a greater risk of radiation exposure to patients and health care staff.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate if LUS had a better correlation to oxygenation (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) compared with the RALE score in ARDS patients. We also aimed to analyse if there was a correlation between RALE score and LUS. We wanted to determine the LUS and RALE score cut-off, which could predict a prolonged length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (≥10 days) and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients aged above 18 years with ARDS as per Berlin definition and admitted to the ICU were included in the study. It was a retrospective study done over a period of 11 months. On the day of admission to ICU, the global and basal LUS, global and basal RALE score, and PaO<sub>2</sub> /FiO<sub>2</sub> were recorded. Outcome and days of ICU stay were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Global LUS score and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> showed the best negative correlation (<i>r =</i> -0.491), which was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.002), followed by global RALE score and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (<i>r =</i> -0.422, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Basal LUS and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> also had moderate negative correlation (<i>r</i> = -0.334, <i>p</i> = 0.043) followed by basal RALE score and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (<i>r</i> = -0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.039). Global RALE score and global LUS did not show a significant correlation. Similarly, there was no significant correlation between basal RALE score and basal LUS. Global and basal LUS as well as global and basal RALE score were not beneficial in predicting either a prolonged length of ICU stay or survival as the area under curve was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In ARDS patients, global LUS had the best correlation to oxygenation (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>), followed by global RALE score. Basal LUS and basal RALE score also had moderate correlation to oxygenation. However, there was no significant correlation between global LUS and global RALE score as well as between basal LUS and basal RALE score. Global and basal LUS as well as global and basal RALE scores were not able to predict a prolonged ICU stay or survival in ARDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"57 ","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/1f/cjrt-2020-063.PMC8132988.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2020-063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Lung ultrasound score (LUS) as well as radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score as calculated from chest radiography (CXR) have been applied to assess Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) severity. CXRs, which are frequently performed in ARDS patients, pose a greater risk of radiation exposure to patients and health care staff.

Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate if LUS had a better correlation to oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) compared with the RALE score in ARDS patients. We also aimed to analyse if there was a correlation between RALE score and LUS. We wanted to determine the LUS and RALE score cut-off, which could predict a prolonged length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (≥10 days) and survival.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients aged above 18 years with ARDS as per Berlin definition and admitted to the ICU were included in the study. It was a retrospective study done over a period of 11 months. On the day of admission to ICU, the global and basal LUS, global and basal RALE score, and PaO2 /FiO2 were recorded. Outcome and days of ICU stay were noted.

Results: Global LUS score and PaO2/FiO2 showed the best negative correlation (r = -0.491), which was significant (p = 0.002), followed by global RALE score and PaO2/FiO2 (r = -0.422, p = 0.009). Basal LUS and PaO2/FiO2 also had moderate negative correlation (r = -0.334, p = 0.043) followed by basal RALE score and PaO2/FiO2 (r = -0.34, p = 0.039). Global RALE score and global LUS did not show a significant correlation. Similarly, there was no significant correlation between basal RALE score and basal LUS. Global and basal LUS as well as global and basal RALE score were not beneficial in predicting either a prolonged length of ICU stay or survival as the area under curve was low.

Conclusion: In ARDS patients, global LUS had the best correlation to oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2), followed by global RALE score. Basal LUS and basal RALE score also had moderate correlation to oxygenation. However, there was no significant correlation between global LUS and global RALE score as well as between basal LUS and basal RALE score. Global and basal LUS as well as global and basal RALE scores were not able to predict a prolonged ICU stay or survival in ARDS patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者肺水肿(RALE)评分与肺超声评分(LUS)氧合及影像学评价的相关性
背景:肺超声评分(LUS)和胸片(CXR)计算的肺水肿(RALE)评分已被用于评估急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的严重程度。经常在ARDS患者中进行的cxr对患者和卫生保健人员造成更大的辐射暴露风险。目的和目的:本研究的目的是评估与ARDS患者的RALE评分相比,LUS与氧合(PaO2/FiO2)是否有更好的相关性。我们还旨在分析RALE评分与LUS之间是否存在相关性。我们想确定LUS和RALE评分的截止点,这可以预测重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(≥10天)和生存时间。方法:选取37例年龄在18岁以上,符合柏林标准的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者作为研究对象。这是一项为期11个月的回顾性研究。入院当天记录患者总体LUS和基础LUS、总体RALE和基础RALE评分、PaO2 /FiO2。记录结果和ICU住院天数。结果:总体LUS评分与PaO2/FiO2呈最佳负相关(r = -0.491),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.002),其次为总体RALE评分与PaO2/FiO2 (r = -0.422, p = 0.009)。基础LUS评分与PaO2/FiO2呈中度负相关(r = -0.334, p = 0.043),其次为基础RALE评分与PaO2/FiO2呈中度负相关(r = -0.34, p = 0.039)。整体RALE评分与整体LUS无显著相关。同样,基础RALE评分与基础LUS之间也没有显著相关性。由于曲线下面积较低,总体和基础LUS以及总体和基础RALE评分在预测ICU住院时间延长或生存方面均无益处。结论:在ARDS患者中,总体LUS与氧合(PaO2/FiO2)的相关性最好,其次是总体RALE评分。基础LUS和基础RALE评分与氧合也有中度相关性。然而,总体LUS与总体RALE评分以及基础LUS与基础RALE评分之间没有显著相关性。总体和基础LUS以及总体和基础RALE评分不能预测ARDS患者ICU住院时间延长或生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信