Impact of EPclin on adjuvant therapeutic decision making and comparison of EPclin to the PREDICT tool.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-22 DOI:10.1177/17246008211012424
Héloïse Bourien, Véronique Quillien, Florence Godey, Christophe Perrin, Fanny Le Du, Sophie Guillermet, Jérôme Blanchot, Vincent Lavoué, Boris Campillo-Gimenez, Angélique Brunot, Laurence Crouzet, Thibault De la Motte Rouge, Véronique Diéras, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse
{"title":"Impact of EPclin on adjuvant therapeutic decision making and comparison of EPclin to the PREDICT tool.","authors":"Héloïse Bourien, Véronique Quillien, Florence Godey, Christophe Perrin, Fanny Le Du, Sophie Guillermet, Jérôme Blanchot, Vincent Lavoué, Boris Campillo-Gimenez, Angélique Brunot, Laurence Crouzet, Thibault De la Motte Rouge, Véronique Diéras, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse","doi":"10.1177/17246008211012424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Genomic signatures, such as EndoPredict®, may help clinicians to decide which adjuvant treatment is the most appropriate. Methods: We propose the EndoPredict® assay for unclear cases of adjuvant treatment in patients treated in our comprehensive cancer center. We prospectively and retrospectively report the decision of adjuvant treatment before and after the EndoPredict® assay, respectively, compared to the PREDICT’s tool scores. Results: From November 2016 to March 2019, 159 breast cancer tumors were analyzed and presented before and after the EndoPredict® assay. Before the EndoPredict® results, clinicians recommended chemotherapy for 57 patients (57/159, 36%). A total of 108 patients (108/159, 68%) were classified as EPclin high-risk score. There was only a slight agreement between clinicians’ decisions and EPclin risk score. The EPclin score led to 37% changes in treatment (59/159); chemotherapy was favored in 80% of cases (47/59). The PREDICT tool recommended chemotherapy for 16 high-risk patients (16/159, 10%). Conclusion: Although genomic tests were developed in order to de-escalate adjuvant treatment, in our comprehensive cancer center the use of the EndoPredict® assay led to an increase in prescribed chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17246008211012424","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17246008211012424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Genomic signatures, such as EndoPredict®, may help clinicians to decide which adjuvant treatment is the most appropriate. Methods: We propose the EndoPredict® assay for unclear cases of adjuvant treatment in patients treated in our comprehensive cancer center. We prospectively and retrospectively report the decision of adjuvant treatment before and after the EndoPredict® assay, respectively, compared to the PREDICT’s tool scores. Results: From November 2016 to March 2019, 159 breast cancer tumors were analyzed and presented before and after the EndoPredict® assay. Before the EndoPredict® results, clinicians recommended chemotherapy for 57 patients (57/159, 36%). A total of 108 patients (108/159, 68%) were classified as EPclin high-risk score. There was only a slight agreement between clinicians’ decisions and EPclin risk score. The EPclin score led to 37% changes in treatment (59/159); chemotherapy was favored in 80% of cases (47/59). The PREDICT tool recommended chemotherapy for 16 high-risk patients (16/159, 10%). Conclusion: Although genomic tests were developed in order to de-escalate adjuvant treatment, in our comprehensive cancer center the use of the EndoPredict® assay led to an increase in prescribed chemotherapy.
EPclin对辅助治疗决策的影响及与PREDICT工具的比较。
目的:基因组特征,如endopdict®,可以帮助临床医生决定哪种辅助治疗是最合适的。方法:我们建议在我们的综合癌症中心接受辅助治疗的不明确病例中使用endopdict®检测。我们前瞻性和回顾性地报告了endopdict®检测前后辅助治疗的决定,并与PREDICT的工具评分进行了比较。结果:2016年11月至2019年3月,我们分析了159例乳腺癌肿瘤,并在endopdict®检测前后进行了报告。在endoppredict®结果公布之前,临床医生推荐57名患者(57/159,36%)接受化疗。共有108例(108/159,68%)患者被归为EPclin高危评分。临床医生的决定与EPclin风险评分之间只有轻微的一致。EPclin评分导致37%的治疗变化(59/159);80%的病例(47/59)倾向于化疗。PREDICT工具推荐16例高危患者接受化疗(16/159,10%)。结论:虽然基因组检测是为了降低辅助治疗的级别而开发的,但在我们的综合癌症中心,endopdict®检测的使用导致了处方化疗的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信